“highly significant”

Using independent t -test for the out-of-pocket expenditure incurred during ANC Visits at government and private health set up, it was found that there was highly significant difference between governments and private expenditures for registration, Ultrasonography (USG), laboratory tests, medicines ( P < 0.0001) and transportation ( P = 0.001).

Day of sampling and the age of the youngest animal in the group were included in all of the models at level 2 and were highly significant in all models ( p < 0.0001).

The highly significant interaction ( P < 0.0001) between external osmotic strength and temperature for the condensation phenotype strongly indicates the interdependence of these two factors.

Fitting a reduced quadratic mixture × linear concentration model provided a highly significant explanation for observed response ( P = 0.0001).

Statistical analysis (ANOVA) indicated a highly significant reduction in pain severity ( P < 0.0001) and related symptoms ( P < 0.0001) evaluated by Michigan Neuropathy Screening instrument, Total Symptom Score, and Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory.

There was a very highly significant negative correlation between the PRRSV load and the level of CSFV antibody in the CSFV MLV vaccination group ( P < 0.0001).

The difference in tumour size between the LGR5 knockdown and the parental cells was highly significant (p<0.0001) at all time points, however the growth of tumours overexpressing LGR5 differed significantly from parental cells only for the first 10 days of the xenografts experiment ( Fig. 5A ).

All correlations were highly significant (P<0.0001).

There was a highly significant correlation between circulating in vivo HI and MN antibody titers and survival (p < 0001).

The observed differences in survival were highly significant both for OS and PFS (Log-rank test; P <0.0001 each).

A highly significant negative correlation between RUNX3 and vimentin protein was observed in these gastric cancer samples ( P < 0.0001; Fig. 8 C).

The influence on the medical students The positive change in students’ desire to become GPs before and after their internship was highly significant (p < 0.0001) (Table 1 ).

The one way ANOVA test revealed a highly significant difference (P-value<0.0001) in the average number of in-chorion contractions between dose groups, and the Tukey-Kramer HSD test identified all pairwise differences as significant at a familywise error rate of 0.05.

A quantitative analysis on day seven revealed highly significant differences in the number, size and roundness of the spheroids generated by D5 cells compared to control NIH3T3 cells ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3 b).

The correlations between these measures are highly significant (Pearson p < 0.0001).

In Cluster 1, only 3.64% of individuals were male, whereas in Cluster 2, this proportion was higher at 35.71%, with a highly significant p-value < 0.0001.

For LPC, the model's p ‐value was less than 0.0001, indicating a highly significant relationship between the response and the variables ( p < 0.0001).

P ‐value was reported as * p < 0.05 considered statistically significant, ** p < 0.01 considered highly significant, and *** p < 0.0001 very highly significant.

There were highly significant differences in the change in HbA 1c between each alogliptin combination group and the glimepiride monotherapy group ( P < 0.0001), whilst the different dosages of alogliptin produced similar reductions in HbA 1c .

The difference between application of sLFS during exploration of one novel cue and sLFS alone ( n = 14) was highly significant (ANOVA, F 1,71 = 34.45; P < 0.0001; n = 8).

Jennrich tests confirmed highly significant statistical differences between controls and Alzheimer’s disease (χ 2 = 1.15 × 10 8 , n 1 = 12, n 2 = 17, P < 0.0001); controls and PSP (χ 2 = 975 547, n 1 = 12, n 2 = 17, P < 0.0001); and Alzheimer’s disease and PSP (χ 2 = 733 030, n 1 = 17, n 2 = 17, P < 0.0001).

The average opposite/same ratio was 0.517 (0.123 SD) for the participants with normal vision, and 1.043 (0.06 SD) for the participants with stereodeficient vision, and their difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001, two-tailed t -test), even with our relatively small population size.

The ANOSIM yielded a highly significant difference in the chemical patterns of the two groups ( ANOSIM : r = 0.9, p = 0.0001).

In contrast, spheroids in the NAFLD group featured highly significant increases in expression of G6PC (6.2‐fold; P < .0001), PCK1 (6.1‐fold; P < .0001), and FASN (13.3‐fold; P < .0001).

The Wilcoxon test determined there are highly significant differences in SHAPE reactivity between groups for both SLA and SLA′ ( P < 0.0001 for SLA; P < 0.05 for SLA).