pylori infection score was higher in FD than NERD and the difference was highly significant ( P <0.0001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
A linear regression analysis showed a very good correlation ( R 2 = 0.924) between the HrOr263 hydrocarbon responses in the ab3A and ab2A neurons, which was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The differences were statistically highly significant ( χ 2 = 1689.11, P < 0.0001).
This difference was determined to be highly significant (p<.0001; number of trials = 1500; number of successes = 1139) using a binomial test and therefore the accuracy in estimating land cover actually increased in the final stages of the competition.
Results Quantity of DNA The test of the extraction protocols indicated that in the case of Qiagen Kit, on average, 8.15 ng (SE = 0.39, i.e., 815 ng/g of mandible) of DNA was obtained per sample, whereas the Promega protocol provided on average 19.20 ng (SE = 0.455, i.e., 1,920 ng/g of mandible) of DNA, and the difference was highly significant ( t test, t = 18.35, df = 17.65, p < 0.0001; Table 1 ).
The correlation between change in HbA1c and level of HbA1c at start of treatment with HCQ was highly significant (correlation coefficient -0.77, p<0.0001).
Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05, while highly significant results were defined as p < 0.0001.
Change in AXL A highly significant correlation was found between changes in SER and changes in AXL in DISC (r=−0.70, p<0.0001) and SV (r=−0.68, p<0.0001) groups.
The impact of measurement time on USCL changes in the 2nd cohort comparisons was highly significant (p < 0.0001).
The two main effects (primer and treatment) and their interaction were all highly significant (P < 0.0001).
We stratified analyses by sex as it was a highly significant effect modifier (p<0·0001).
Multilocus epigenetic heterogeneity between sites was highly significant (Φ ST from AMOVA = 0.286, P <0.0001), with about 28% of total epigenetic variance in the sample being accounted for by between-site differences.
Statistical analysis Analysis of variance showed highly significant differences among ranks ( p <0.0001), in terms of the number of genes coding for TFs, as depicted in Additional file 10 .
A slight increase in potassium (within normal reference ranges) was significant ( P < .05) and decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were highly significant ( P < .0001).
The regression models were both found to be highly significant (p < 0.0001), while the values for lack of fit values were not significant (p > 0.05), confirming the model fitness to produce predictions for optimal hydrolysis conditions.
In contrast, a highly significant difference ( p <0.0001) was detected in the frequency of mspA phase ON (tract length of 6, 9 or 12Cs) strains in the carriage versus invasive collections ( Table 6 ), with mspA being significantly more often ON in invasive isolates compared to carriage isolates (69.2% compared to 50.0%).
At the level of Ct values of our extraction methods, a highly significant, very strong positive correlation was demonstrated between the miRNeasy kit and the TRIzol and Universal kits (miRNeasy/Universal p < 0.0001, r = 0.980; TRIzol/miRNeasy p < 0.0001 r = 0.959), and a highly significant, very strong positive correlation was found between the TRIzol and Universal kits (TRIzol/Universal p = <0.0001, r = 0.965) ( Figure 3 ). 3.2.
We found a highly significant lower frequency of SARS-CoV-2-specific TNF+CD4+ and CD8+ T cells ( p < 0.0001) correlated with increasing BMI category (Supplementary Table 11 ; ANOVA for general linear models with adjustment for covariates), as well as trends of lower SARS-CoV-2-specific IL-2+CD4+T cells and higher CRP ( p ≤ 0.014, q < 0.156).
Also, a highly significant positive correlation ( p value <0.0001) between IV and PUFAs (Linolenic (C18 : 3) ( r 2 = 0.990) and Linoleic (C18 : 2) ( r 2 = 0.994)) was observed.
While both monotherapies induced a modest increase in CD69 expression, the combination treatment led to highly significant upregulation compared with the vehicle ( p < 0.0001 for CD4+, p = 0.0005 for CD8+, Dunn’s test).
While the correlations between SPAD measurements and disease severity scores were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), they were relatively weak except for SM, which is a binary metric in which only disease severity levels of 1 (not affected) or 5 (severely affected) were observed.
The difference in CENP-A recruitment efficiency between CAL1 1–100 and CAL1 1–192 was highly significant (P < 0.0001), leading us to conclude that even though the first 100 amino acids of CAL1 are sufficient to mediate some CENP-A recruitment, robust recruitment requires residues 1–192.
The mean worst BCVA and mean final BCVA (logMAR) were 1.26 ± 0.87 and 0.61 ± 0.85, respectively, and their difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Friedman test).
There was a highly significant relationship between larval mortality ( p < 0.0001) and the total percentage of pupae formed ( p < 0.0001) both among concentrations and among different samples of Au-doped ZnO.
Statistical analyses showed highly significant positive correlations (p<0.0001) between all of the units/titers measured in the different antibody assays ( Table 2 ).