“highly significant”

Indeed, the genetic differentiation between the American and European continents that was detected by cpSSRs was high ( F ST = 0.369), and highly significant (P <0.0001).

There was a highly significant variation ( p < 0.0001) between the two settings in reported answers on handwashing after touching raw chicken—while 90.4% of respondents in Egypt indicated they washed their hands with soapy water, only 27.2% of respondents in Iraq indicated doing so.

The association between ILD prevalence and RA duration was highly significant (P<0.0001).

Notably, the region was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with substantial variation observed across different geographic areas.

The p values show that coefficients of the main effects are highly significant ( p < 0.0001), compared to the interaction effect.

In particular, Sz patients showed highly significant reductions in theta phase synchrony (PLI) to LSF ( F (1,36) = 23.2, p < 0.0001) but not HSF ( F (1,36) = 1.97, p = 0.17) stimuli relative to controls within this 100–300 ms interval leading to a significant main effect of group across SF ( F (1,72) = 6.91, p < 0.0001) as well as a significant group × SF interaction ( F (1,72) = 6.91, p = 0.01).

The traps with pheromone lures captured significantly more males ( p < 0.0001) and females ( p < 0.0001) than the isopropanol controls, and the total of both sexes was also highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 4 ).

A r -value of 0.97 shows very strong correlation between CFB and GCB, which was statistically highly significant ( P <0.0001).

Although there was a highly significant increase following the 6h of SD in all three groups (2xANOVA: WT: Interaction F 8,137 = 23.2, p < 0.0001; Time: F 8,137 = 12.1, p < 0.0001; SD: F 1,137 = 27.6, p < 0.0001; Tau : Interaction F 8,91 = 5.5, p < 0.0001; Time: F 8,91 = 3.2, p < 0.005; SD: F 1,91 = 46.7, p < 0.0001; Chimera: Interaction F 8,85 = 9.6 p < 0.0001; Time: F 8,85 = 5.2, p < 0.0001; SD: F 1,85 = 6.5, p < 0.05), direct comparison revealed the slower recovery, as reported by delta power during NREMS, in un-entrained Tau mice ( Figure 5M ).

An analysis of the z -transform of these correlations coefficients revealed that the difference was highly significant, t (75) = 8.41, p < 0.0001 (GF items with each other: z = 0.709; GF items with other items: z = 0.237).

IG# showed a highly significant difference between non-infected and infected patients early in period 1 and period 5, ( P < 0.0001).

The comparative action of the extract’s activity according to concentration showed that whatever the concentration (from 5 to 25 mg/mL) the dichloromethane extract showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) compared to the other active extracts.

Figure 2B illustrates the comparison of true versus predicted ages, yielding a Pearson correlation coefficient r of 0.56 and a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.0001).

Treatment with AC102 showed a concentration-dependent decrease of morphological cell damage, with a significant decrease at 30 μM (66.5 ± 9.51%, p = 0.028) and highly significant decrease at 100 μM (35.99 ± 9.51; p < 0.0001; Fig. 5b ).

Kaplan–Meier analysis of independent testing on two data sets ( Figure 7 ) shows a highly significant difference ( P -value of <0.0001) in terms of overall survival between the ‘early recurrence’ and ‘late recurrence’ groups.

However, there is no evidence from these studies that ethnicity would disrupt the utility of GI for ranking the glycemic impact of foods; the correlation between the GI in non-Caucasians and the GI in Caucasians was highly significant ( r =0.820, n =28, P <0.0001).

For MSP2-3D7, the different methods of coupling resulted in highly significant differences in antibody-binding affinities (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons, except between N- and C-terminal His-tagged couplings where no difference could be seen).

A slight decreasing trend of malaria mortality was observed over the whole study period which is however highly significant (p = 0.0001).

The overall differences were highly significant: Wilks’ Lambda: 0.02 ~ F 168,1549 = 7.26 P < 0.0001, and the squared Mahalanobis distances provided the specific P -values between groups ( Table 2 ).

All factors were therefore taken forward into a multivariable model and again all factors were highly significant (all p < 0.0001) (Table S 7 ).

The pairwise comparisons between concentrations in front of and behind the filter unit revealed highly significant differences for all microbiological parameters ( p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test).

As indicated in Fig 2C , the difference between malignant tissue and non-malignant paired tissue was highly significant ( p <0.0001), and the difference between malignant tissue and benign tumor tissue was significant ( p = 0.0115).

Mice first tipped the cup containing a smaller, more painful bark scorpion only 8.6% of the time, demonstrating a highly significant, collective preference for stripe-tailed scorpions (Z s = 3.896, p < 0.0001; Figure 1 ).

For the levels of IgG antibody against almost all the eight tested antigens, the differences in mean ± SD in patients versus controls were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 1 ).

Although there is no significant “dam” effect, we find a highly significant “sire” effect ( P < 0.0001, ANOVA), with fewer progeny produced in crosses involving a tetracycline-treated male than in crosses involving control males (Fig. 3 ).