Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found a highly significant correlation between chronological age and epigenetic age for both baseline (V1) and week 12 (V2) calculated using the Hannum (V1: p < 0.0001, R = 0.74; V2: p < 0.0001, R = 0.77; Fig. 2 A) and Horvath (V1: p < 0.0001, R = 0.69; V2: p < 0.0001, R = 0.70; Fig. 2 B) clocks.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Studies of lesions of patients with borderline leprosy have revealed strong correlations between TGF-β and NGF, and TGF-β and NGF-R ( r = 0.8722 and r = 0.7257, respectively), with highly significant p -values for the two correlations ( p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0015, respectively) ( 48 , 49 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
By day 30, the DG exhibited characteristic features of granule cell dispersion (GCD), with loosening of the granule cell layer, blurring of the boundary between the granule cell layer and molecular layer, and expansion of granule cell distribution ( Figure 1 C), in line with previous observations in experimental and human TLE [ 46 , 47 ].Quantitative evaluation of NeuN immunofluorescence demonstrated a highly significant, progressive increase across the evaluated longitudinal time points from day 1 to day 30 post-modeling (One-way ANOVA, F (4, 10) = 2495.0, p < 0.0001).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a clear difference in the soma areas of the NK1r cells that were retrogradely labelled with CTb (range, 116-1084 μm 2 ; median, 228 μm 2 ) and those that were not (range, 52-625 μm 2 ; median, 101 μm 2 ), and this was highly significant ( P < 0.0001; Mann–Whitney U test).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
colemani in Spring Cucumbers A repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that the main effect of DACT was highly significant ( F = 219.78, df = 3, 1347, p < 0.0001), as was the interaction between treatment and DACT ( F = 53.97, df = 6, 1344, p < 0.0001), indicating significant temporal variation and treatment effects over time.
highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A highly significant decrease in the VAS digestive symptom score was observed in the Marsh stage 1 group (pre = 47.5 vs . post = 33.2, P <0.0001), whereas the change in the Marsh stage 0 group (pre = 45.9 vs . post = 44.0) was not significant.