The comparison of the two CHIKV strains at corresponding MOI displayed a highly significant difference with p < 0.0001 between 0.0129 and 12.9 (Fig. 2 C).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Compared with the groups of healthy people, the abundance of Firmicutes showed a highly significant upward trend in the groups of UF patients ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2B ).
Upon comparing baseline and post-operative Venham's picture test scores, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test revealed a highly significant difference in the Binaural auditory beats group (p = 0.0001), indicating its efficacy in anxiety reduction.
The students with JIA who were able to attend school were absent much more often than controls (63% compared to 20%), with a highly significant p value (p<0.0001).
The total QoL score of patients treated with PEMF before and after intervention was 76.05 (21.29) and 101.80 (15.98), respectively, which showed a highly significant increase after treatment ( P < 0.0001).
The association between obese and CRC in overlapping DMRs was highly significant as suggested by Chi square test (p < 0.0001).
Concordantly, enhanced expressions of CD24 and CD200 were observed in all three NB lines following cultivation in stem cell media, which was highly significant (p < 0.0001) for CD200 compared to both serum-supplemented incubations.
Pearson correlation analysis between qRT-PCR (ΔΔCt method) and RNA-seq (log2FC) data revealed a highly significant positive correlation (Pearson’s r = 0.965, R2 = 0.984, 95% CI: 0.942–0.991, p < 0.0001), demonstrating strong consistency between the two platforms.
The criterion for significance was set as p < 0.05, and highly significant differences in the statistics were accepted if p < 0.0001.
“In-within” multiple comparisons determined that this increase in AGO1 during reactivation was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) compared to levels of AGO1 during latency (Fig. 7 a, right).
Chemotype extract concentration also had a strong and highly significant effect on nematode motility (F = 20.44, p < 0.0001), demonstrating a clear dose-dependent response.
SOX9 expression demonstrated strong diagnostic value, particularly in post-SVR-HCC patients, with a highly significant AUC of 0.92 and a specificity of 97.22% ( P < 0.0001), indicating its potential utility in this clinical context.
The P for trend was calculated by treating HIV/CD4 group as an ordinal variable with four levels (0 to 3) and was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
In the sensitivity analysis excluding single-study agents, the test of moderators remained highly significant (QM(df = 4) = 54.61, p < 0.0001), with moderate residual heterogeneity (τ 2 = 0.19; I 2 = 31%).
The superiority of propolis was highly significant ( P < 0.0001; Mann-Whitney U test modified for superiority testing with a threshold 0.5 days; Figure 4 ).
As shown in Figure 4 , the diagnostic power of C6Ma1 and C6Ma3 was highly significant with an AUROC of 0.90 ( P < .0001) and of 0.87 ( P < .0001), respectively when comparing healthy control to patients with cancer.
All investigated traits had a highly significant effect on longevity (P < 0.0001).
Highly significant differences were observed among the genotypes ( P < 0.0001) across all traits. β-carotene ranged from 0.028 to 0.763 μg/g, lutein from 0.11 to 4.79 μg/g, and zeaxanthin from 0.05 to 1.69 μg/g, with total carotenoids reaching up to 9.15 μg/g.
These results correlate with the analysis of variance (ANOVA), which revealed highly significant effects for both inoculum dose ( p < 0.0001) and incubation time ( p = 0.0003), with the former being the most determinant factor (F = 310.66).
The difference between syntenic and non-syntenic genes was highly significant ( P < 0.0001, Wilcoxon rank-sum test) for all species separately.
The difference in heme levels between the Sham group and the ischemic core region was highly significant (P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 2 d).
The fungal species factor showed a highly significant effect (SS = 102,747.0; df = 2; MS = 51,373.4; F = 7730.34; p < 0.0001), indicating substantial differences in growth among the three fungal species evaluated.
The one-sample t- test comparing the sample mean 2.1 with 3, the score signifying no change, was highly significant, t (566) = − 24.6, p < 0.0001, d = − 1.0.
We next treated Aβ flies carrying a loss-of-function mutation of dFKBP59 , which showed a highly significant increase in lifespan, relative to non-BCS treated flies ( Fig. 4B ; P = 0.0001).
The analysis of variance revealed highly significant effects ( p < 0.0001) of pruning wound age, fungal species, and their interaction on lesion development in both experimental years.