“highly significant”

The relative neutrophil count was 68±2% for the patient group and 46.4±2% for the control group with a highly significant difference between both groups (p<0.0001), the mean absolute neutrophil count was not different between both groups (p=0.1).

This level of therapeutic efficacy was highly significant, with a Fisher’s exact test 95% CI range of 79.7–99.9% (p<0.0001).

The free binding energies of kaempferol and catechin were highly significant with p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001, respectively.

A highly significant difference between the aligned read depths was observed, with a mean depth of 560±237.88 for the iPCR samples and 312.87 ± 372.72 for the pPCR samples ( P -value < 0.0001; paired t- test).

Similarly, the comparison between 2020 and 2023 showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001).

While the inhibition was highly significant with all three inhibitors ( p < 0.0001), OP decreased the sialidase activity the greatest and lower than the untreated control ( Figure 2 D,H,I).

The association remained highly significant ( P < 0.0001 for all models) after adjustment for age, gender, and BMI in Model 2 (OR: 1.59, 95%CI: 1.45-1.74), additional ethnic/racial groups in Model 3 (OR: 1.65, 95%CI: 1.50-1.81), and all covariates in Model 4 (OR: 1.40, 95%CI: 1.27-1.54).

The day × pasture treatment interaction was not significant in 2017 ( p = 0.302), but the main effect for the RFI group tended to be significant ( p = 0.059), and day and pasture treatment were both highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The log rank test analysis indicated that the difference between the survival curves is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Similarly, all non-constant terms in a cubic regression of onset age on number of repeats were highly significant (p<0.0001), and the overall F-test for comparing the cubic model to a constant-age-of-onset model had a p-value of 4.4e-15.

This finding was also clear for simulations on the directed AMBCA-based network when compared with the random directed network ( Figure 4B ), with a larger difference in predictive power (random − directed = −0.086), which was highly significant for unpaired ( p < 0.0001) and paired ( p < 0.0001) t testing.

In addition, the difference between real synchrony and surrogate synchrony estimated by SUCO was highly significant ( t (44) = 43.80, p < 0.0001).

An unpaired t-test between PPG-based (mean = 140 ms, SD = 10 ms, n = 116) and our measurement (mean = 98.3 ms, SD = 16.9 ms, n = 18) confirms a highly significant difference between the distributions; t(132) = 16.75, p < 0.0001.

Experiments that supplemented carotenoids rather than correlations with concentrations of carotenoids in blood resulted in significantly larger effect sizes (p = 0.006), but an analysis without the supplementation studies still yielded a highly significant overall effect size ( table 2 , p<0.0001).

Statistical tests, including the likelihood ratio and Pearson chi-square, were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Both serum and urine I-FABP levels had a highly significant positive correlation with each other ( r = 0.406 P < 0.0001).

The differences between the cadherin-expressing and the nonexpressing cells were highly significant at all time points (P < 0.0001) after day 2.

Differences were considered significant at a probability level of P < 0.01 (*), very significant at P < 0.001 (**) and highly significant at P < 0.0001 (***).

A t -test for correlated samples confirmed a highly significant mean decrease of 37.77 points ( P < 0.0001).

When comparing melanoma recurrences in all patients before and after vaccination, there was a highly significant decrease in the number of longitudinal cumulative recurrent metastatic events ( p < 0.0001) after vaccination.

The highly significant differences between CSF and paired peripheral blood lymphoid phenotype ( p <0.0001) confirms the existence of an active mechanism of lymphoid migration through the meninges. cerebrospinal fluid lymphocytes flow cytometry NHL cerebral lymphatic system The CSF population was represented by lymphocytes (77%; range 20–100%) together with a minor population of monocytes (CD4-weak or CD14-positive 15%; range 0–70%).

As displayed by Figure 3 A, neurons from both P149 lines and P34 2 show as compared to CTLRs neurons a visible reduction of nuclear area, quantified by scoring 50 neurons per sample, as highly significant ( p value < 0.0001) ( Figure 3 C).

The least square (LS) mean differences compared with placebo in SPID6 values for the 62.5, 125, 250-mg, and combined DFN-15 groups were −756.6, −1120.7, −1355.1, and −1076.9, respectively, which were statistically highly significant for all comparisons ( P < 0.0001, ANCOVA model).

Fitting a generalized linear model with negative binomial errors to the data on number of thalli per individual from infected nests (fitted dispersion parameter θ = 4.39) showed a highly significant difference between nests in the level of infection (Wald χ 2 = 245.05, df = 1, p < 0.0001), and also a strong effect of estimated worker age (Wald χ 2 = 70.3, df = 4, p < 0.0001), with older workers having a higher load of thalli (Fig. 7 ), but no association with the presence or absence of P. alcon caterpillars (Wald χ 2 = 0.719, df = 1, p = 0.396).

The ANOVA results ( Table 1 ) suggest that the model was highly significant with a high F value (F model = 62.16) and a very low probability p -value ( p < 0.0001) [ 21 ].