“highly significant”

Of the 300 respondents, 173 (58%) felt the interaction to also be an educational experience for them, with a highly significant facility effect ( P < 0.0001).

The chi-square statistic was 28.28, which was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

This regression was highly significant (standardized beta = 0.49 ± 0.002, t = 35.25, P < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.34; linear regression).

The overall significance of sex in this model was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for all three populations using the log-likelihood test.

Comparing the survival rates of patients with different histopathological tumor gradings showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2 ).

Fitting the Mathematical Models Highly significant second-order polynomial models ( p < 0.0001) with an insignificant lack-of-fit were satisfactorily fitted to predict the independent variables based on the multiple linear regression analysis of the experimental data ( Table 2 ).

This reduction of eNOS in histological sections was supported by a highly significant reduction in both eNOS protein expression ( P < 0.0001) and NO production ( P < 0.0001) in tissue extracts of CT vs.

Model Adequacy, ANOVA, and RSM Optimization The results of analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Table 4 ) demonstrated that all three quadratic models were highly significant, as indicated by large F ‐values (TPC: 71.54; DPPH: 59.86; reducing power: 101.76) and very low p ‐values ( p < 0.0001).

About 18% of those with hypertension also received a diabetes classification, versus 4.6% of those without hypertension, a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).

Nonetheless, it would be incorrect to state that we found “no significant reduction in BMI [Body Mass Index] z-scores in the total sample”; in fact, analysis of the total sample indicated a highly significant (p < 0.0001), though modest decrease of 0.06 in BMI-for-Age Z score over the course of the school year.

In the IPTW-weighted Kaplan–Meier analyses, overall survival remained consistently lower among patients who omitted RT in the adjuvant cohort, with a highly significant weighted log-rank test ( p < 0.0001) ( Supplemental Figure S2A ).

Results : There was a highly significant difference in judged recovery time (ME/CFS = 12.7 ± 1.2 d; CTL = 2.1 ± 0.2 d, mean ± s.e.m., Chi 2 = 90.1, p < 0.0001).

In the middle quartiles ( Figure 4 D,E), donepezil-treated aged mice showed highly significant reductions in alveolar size compared to aged controls ( p < 0.0001).

The values obtained are highly significant (P < 0.0001).

Results and Discussion The effect of species on the probability of thigmotropism was highly significant between fusarial isolates belonging to FSSC and FOSC (Odds ratio = 2.81, z = 14.634, p < 0.0001).

Statistical analysis using an unpaired t test with Welch’s correction showed a highly significant difference between groups ( p < 0.0001).

While pairing at this locus was abolished throughout the gonad in the hal-2 single mutant, the syp-3; hal-2 double mutant exhibited a highly significant increase in pairing over the hal-2 single mutant specifically in Zone 2 (p<0.0001), the same zone in which chromosome V PCs were shown to be active in the hal-2; syp-2 double mutant.

Highly significant increases of DMG were observed upon intake of both Superba Boost TM ( p < 0.0001) and choline bitartrate ( p < 0.0001), while this was not the case for fish oil ( p = 0.1091), as shown in Figure 4 .

The directional biases of the overlapping genes between VSH/NVS and FOR/NUR phenotype were also highly significant (X 2 = 27.52, p < 0.0001 - Table 3 ),with a larger proportion of genes over-expressed in VSH being also over-expressed in nurse antennae, and vice versa .

1 ), being the difference with the WT variability highly significant (Wilcoxon signed rank test V = 12246, P < 0.0001).

Highly significant differences between adjacent and tumor tissues were found by statistical analysis using the Mann–Whitney U test ( p < 0.0001 for all comparisons; Figure 2 A–C).

The learning gadget item was found to be not significant on the cognitive factor (loading = −0.16, P = 0.43) but highly significant on the functional factor (loading = 0.84, P < 0.0001).

The stage factor remained highly significant in all cases [F(2,54) = 70.63; p < 0.0001], reflecting the expected general progression of seizures.

The correlation coefficient between drip loss and colour score of LM was negative and highly significant (r = −0.62, P < 10 −4 ); two adjacent SNPs associated with both traits were within a region of 11.12 Mb (between 84.83 and 95.95 Mb) on SSC9, which indicates that this region may contain a pleiotropic QTL (Table 3 ).

Biomarker Confirmation through Targeted Immunoassay We observed a highly significant correlation between plasma SOMAmer intensity and TNNT2 concentration (r = 0.81, p < 0.0001) (Fig S8A ).