“highly significant”

One‐way ANOVA showed that the treatment factor had a highly significant main effect on SOD activity ( F (4, 10) = 30.12, p < 0.0001, partial η 2 = 0.923), MDA level ( F (4, 10) = 39.59, p < 0.0001, partial η 2 = 0.941), and GSH‐Px activity ( F (4, 10) = 48.95, p < 0.0001, partial η 2 = 0.951).

Degradation of acrylamide ( Figure 6 ) proved to be highly significant (**** p < 0.0001) after 3 (1100 ± 18 μg kg −1 ) and 6 months (490 ± 7 μg kg −1 ) of storage compared to that acrylamide content in the fresh samples (1400 ± 11 μg kg −1 ).

A Kruskal–Wallis test revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) in CC distribution between resistant and susceptible groups, indicating a lineage-linked resistance phenotype, and identifying CC31 and CC155 as consistently sensitive.

Throughout the biophysical simulations for ligand screening, the effects of each lipocalin, the ligand and their interactions on the dependent variable for the binding energy and distance from the active site were highly significant ( P-value < 0.0001; Table 1 ).

We tested whether WBISI correlated with indices based on fasting measures and found a highly significant correlation between WBISI and QUICKI (r = 0.905, p < 0.0001).

Both our cohort and that of Morris et al had a highly significant paired 2-tailed t test for Na + 1 ≠ Na + 2 ( P < 0.0001).

In the entire PRDM9 protein of 894 amino acids, only 96 amino acids are in a DNA-binding turn-helix region (8 in each of 12 ZF domains), indicating a highly significant enrichment of nonsynonymous SNPs in turn-helix residues (24/31 vs. 96/894, P<0.0001 by Fisher's exact test).

Friedman’s test proved that the effect of the stimulus on perceived fear was highly significant (chi-square = 6130.252, df = 41, P < 0.0001).

Finally, logistic regressions show no significant relationships between phenotypic and environmental values at the outset (pseudo- R 2 s ≈ 0.0, P values > 0.1), but show highly significant relationships at the ends of the simulations ( P < 0.0001 for all values of Φ), with the amounts of variation explained increasing as a function of selection strength (pseudo- R 2 = 0.327 for Φ = 0.01, 0.376 for Φ = 0.05, and 0.406 for Φ = 0.1).

This was significant only for gata2b u 5008/ u 5008 , but Pearson’s correlation was highly significant across genotypes (Pearson correlation −0.77, p < 0.0001).

In Plastibell technique, there was significant penile edema 40 (10.6%) and proximal migration of the ring 19 (5%) and this variation was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Highly significant decreases in an age-dependent manner were observed in the concentrations of T3 and T4 ( p = 0.0001, both). 3.4.

Histograms indicated a highly significant increase in mean NAVs after stimulation with 2 or 10 nM iloprost ( p < 0.0001) for those phosphopeptides with PKA consensus site versus no such site (Suppl.

Comparison between the survival curves was highly significant (log-rank test, chi square=26.5; p <0.0001).

Restricting the analysis to the five populations sampled within Ryder Bay, global F st was lower (0.0181) but still highly significant ( P <0.0001), indicating the presence of fine-scale population genetic structuring.

The quadratic model for GABA yield ( Y , mM) was highly significant (F=39.65, p<0.0001, R 2 =96.59 %), with significant terms for MSG (p=0.0338), sucrose (p=0.0284), their interaction (p=0.0319), and quadratic terms for both MSG (p<0.0001) and sucrose (p<0.0001) ( Table 4 and Table 5 ).

Differences were considered significant when p ≤ 0.05 (*) or highly significant when p ≤ 0.0001 (**).

The difference between treatments was highly significant in both studies ( P < 0.0001) [ 26 , 27 ].

We found an increased frequency of heterozygous genotype and minor allele of the TLR4 rs4986790 SNP in women with OC compared with healthy controls, and this result remained highly significant after Bonferroni’s correction for multiple testing ( p < 0.0001).

Both groups appeared to show a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) improvement in demeanor and exercise tolerance at day 35, yet the difference between groups was not significant.

Mean ODI score improved from 82.32% preoperatively to 19.17% at final follow-up, a highly significant improvement ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 6 ).

All LLR values were positive and the difference from zero was highly significant ( p <0.0001), indicating that the power law provided the better fit to the data.

Comparing all of the nine different chemical blends, there were highly significant differences (P<0.0001).

pombe spores irradiated at the same level; the differences being highly significant (p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 1B ).

Overall P values for flow during in situ perfusion versus ex situ perfusion could also be proven as being highly significant ( P <0.0001).