“highly significant”

A pairwise comparison between load levels separately for alphabetical and forward conditions showed highly significant differences (p < 0.0001) for all pairs but two.

Using a two-way ANOVA by population (control/migraine) and stimulus duration, the effect of stimulus duration was highly significant (p<0.0001) and the variation between individual subjects was significant (p = 0.0008).

Maxillary central incisors were the most commonly impacted teeth with a prevalence rate reported at 78.8%, while the results were found to be statistically highly significant when compared between maxillary and mandibular teeth ( P = 0.0001) [ Table 3 ].

To determine the statistical significance of this reduction, a paired t-test was conducted, which revealed a highly significant decrease in pain levels (p < 0.0001).

By 1 month after treatment there were highly significant differences between the LI-ESWT and placebo groups (p < 0.0001).

Notably, we found that each predicted group was associated with the highest median expression of its corresponding gene signature, and this difference in expression was highly significant in all groups ( P < .0001, Figure 2B ).

Two-way ANOVA analysis revealed highly significant main effects of TIMP-1 concentration ( p < 0.0001 in both cell lines), indicating robust dose-dependent suppression of invasion.

* p ≤ 0.05 was considered as statistically significant, ** p ≤ 0.01 very significant, *** p ≤ 0.001 highly significant and **** p ≤ 0.0001 most significant.

Results In terms of detection, participants successfully detected 95±6% (average±STD) of the Duck-under obstacles in the test trials while using the EyeCane, in a highly significant manner over the control while using the white-cane alone 13±30% ( p < 0.0001) (see Fig. 3A ).

Spheroid ciliary beat frequency discriminated highly significant between healthy controls (9.3 Hz) and PCD patients (2.4 Hz) ( P < 0.0001).

The interaction between plasma treatment and salinity was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) across all GP parameters, highlighting the complex relationship between these two factors.

The GWAS analysis revealed a total of 80 highly significant Bonferroni corrected SNPs ( p < 0.0001 (−log10 ( p ) = 9.45) located on eight autosomes ( Table S1 ).

500 nM Aβ 1–42 ), 23.1 ± 2.4% (mean ± SEM; n = 23) of wild type dendritic spines were associated with amyloid-β-immunoreactive puncta, whereas in contrast spines from p75 NTR ko neurons showed a colocalization ratio of only 6.9 ± 1.1% (mean ± SEM; n = 24), a difference that was statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001).

The regression was highly significant statistically ( F = 3935.97; df = 1, 43; p < 0.0001; R 2 = 0.99).

As expected, the effect of glucose was highly significant (p<0.0001) while fluvastatin had no significant influence on EE (p=0.57); there was no significant interaction between glucose administration and fluvastatin (p=0.21) ( Figure 4A ).

We analyzed the expression of PD-1 on T cells ( Figure 4 E) and detected highly significant increased frequencies of PD-1-expressing CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in the tumor ( p < 0.0001).

Linear regression analysis showed a highly significant correlation between hemispheric loss and hippocampal area loss (R2 = 0.855, p < 0.0001), with hippocampal loss tending to be greater (B = 1.209) than hemispheric area loss.

The results reveal a highly significant positive correlation between flower size and head diameter at the basal, middle and apical zone of the head (r 2 = 0.56, P< 0.0001).

This difference was statistically highly significant (p = 0.0001) (Figure 5 ).

The highly significant p-values (p-value < 0.0001) for the likelihood ratio, score, and Wald tests indicate that the model as a whole fits significantly better than an intercept-only model, confirming that the inclusion of explanatory variables provides a meaningful contribution to predicting adherence levels ( Table 2 ).

A highly significant association was seen between early PSA recurrence and elevated ADAM15 expression ( Figure 4 A , P < .0001) in all tumors and also in subgroups of ERG fusion negative and positive cancers ( P < .0001, P = .0002); ( Figure 4 B and C).

The analysis of variance, one-way ANOVA [ 71 ], showed that the difference between the two groups is highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001). c .

However, the time × prototype interaction was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating that the effect of time on L-Lys release depended on the prototype used. 4.

The differences in Ln probability of the data between the two most likely scenarios (#1: length-at-age as prior, k = 2 and #2: sampling location as prior, k = 2; Fig 4 ) were highly significant (Steel-Dwass All Pairs, z = 5.7, p <0.0001).

All the models were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), describing a high degree of correlation between the experimental and predicted values.