“highly significant”

Considering the gingival scores, a statistically highly significant reduction in groups taking cholecalciferol supplementation (p<0.0001) on subsequent visits depending on the dosage, while statistically insignificant results were seen in the placebo-consuming folk (Table 3 ).

timopheevii introgression lines showed highly significant variation across all traits (p <0.0001) ( Table 3 ) with a normal distribution for all seven traits ( Figure 2 ).

Results ICount analysis After generating calibration curves using both methods, we found that the P -values of the regression lines were highly significant (Y micro = 0.87x micro + 3.02; R 2 = 0.965, P < 0.0001 and Y macro = 0.59x macro + 69.74, R 2 = 0.965, P < 0.0001).

Summed fluorescence values relative to BF long-latency activity ( Figure 2 c) indicated a highly significant difference across the four groups, illustrating a strong reduction of neuronal assembly magnitude with maturation (F (3,120) = 9.613, p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA).

This shows that the RC is lower (fewer samples and lower ADAb titre in this model) but continues to be highly significant [RC −3.70 (95% CI: −5.01 to −2.32), P < 0.0001].

Degrees of significance were assessed by three different rating values: * p < 0.05 (significant), ** p < 0.01 (highly significant), *** p < 0.001 (extremely significant), and **** p ≤ 0.0001 (extremely significant), or non-significant ( p > 0.05). 5.

Two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of the genotype and the distance from the soma on the number of intersections ( p < 0.0001, F (1,4023) = 37.46 and p < 0.0001, F (26,4023) = 163.7, respectively), as well as a highly significant interaction between those two factors ( p < 0.0001, F (26,4023) = 2.488).

In C2C12 mouse myoblasts ( Figure 4 C), all shuffled variants showed highly significant increased functional transduction over rAAV1 (p < 0.0001), rAAV6 (p < 0.001–0.0001), and rAAV8 (p < 0.01–0.0001).

The result was reported as highly significant with p < 0.0001 (statistical method not specified [ 33 ]).

Bartlett's test of sphericity, which is sensitive to smaller sample sizes, was highly significant ( p > 0.0001) ( Worthington and Whittaker, 2006 ).

The cut-off value was 3.8 ng/ml, and the difference between the groups was highly significant (p< 0.0001).

The results showed a highly significant reduction in the levels of total vitamin D ( P < 0.0001), VDR ( P < 0.0001), vitamin D 3 ( P < 0.05), and calcium ( P < 0.0001) in the serum of CRC patients compared to the controls.

Baseline global EP score and EDSS were highly significant predictors ( p < 0.0001) of EDSS progression 6 years later.

4 a) and highly significant (p < 0.0001).

The CT heterozygote once more demonstrated a significantly lower risk (OR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.2–0.5; p = 0.0001) among individuals without a family history, while the TT homozygous mutant genotype demonstrated a highly significant increased risk (OR = 2.79; 95% CI = 1.7–4.3; p = 0.0001).

In the study provided in European countries, it was stated that there was a highly significant difference of 25(OH)D levels across European countries ( p < 0.0001) among women in the postmenopausal period.

This difference was highly significant ( F 3, 78 = 67.148, P < 0.0001) as there were no samples in which the sodium contents of G. magellanica leaves overlapped with that of the other species.

When the CCP level was high positive (>40), the odds of RA were found to be 4.94 times as high as compared to a low positive CCP, and this was highly significant ( P < .0001).

A linear regression, regressing CV on year, was highly significant ( β = 0.0043 [CI = 0.0035–0.0051, P < 0.0001]) (Table 2 and Fig. 1 ).

HR exhibited a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) between Phase 4 (90.6 ± 11.8) and Phase 6 (82.4 ± 14.6).

The differences between the observed and the expected numbers were of low significance ( p = .0382) in females, while in males, the difference was highly significant ( p < .0001).

Pearson correlation analysis showed a highly significant correlation between Nat-LTP and Wt-LTP (R 2 = 0.9491, p < 0.0001, n = 27; Fig. 2 , large panel).

In the present study a two-way analysis of ANOVA (age × treatment) showed highly significant differences of age ( F 2, 78 = 43.43, p < 0.0001), treatment ( F 3, 78 = 61.01, p < 0.0001), and age × treatment interaction ( F 6, 78 = 8.706, p < 0.0001; Fig. 5 ).

The data indicate that the regression model is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the error term is not significant ( p > 0.05).

We observed a highly significant (p < 0.0001) negative correlation between the frequency of these cells and the peripheral lymphocyte count as measured after 7 days of hospitalization ( Figure 3 E).