Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The blood glucose level estimation on the third day after streptozotocin (STZ) administration for the confirmation of induction of diabetes in the experimental animal groups revealed a highly significant (p<0.0001) increase in the blood glucose level (21.26 to 22.81 mmol/L) of all experimental groups except nondiabetic control ((6.53±0.2) mmol/L) and vehicle control ((6.66±0.15) mmol/L) groups.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant interaction with age (p < 0.0001), such that the association was only observed for younger compared with older individuals: HR 1.27 (1.15-1.39) and HR 1.00 (0.92-1.09) in individuals ≤75 years and >75 years, respectively.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In each of the three analyses, there was a negative, highly significant correlation between salmon stock development and watermill development (Period 1260–1940: declining stocks for periods without data: r = −0.813 and P < 0.0001; Period 1260–1940: constant stocks for periods without data: r = −0.828 and P < 0.0001; Period 1550–1940: declining stocks for periods without data: r = −0.903 and P < 0.0001).
highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Consumption of 15 g alcohol or more per day was associated with a relative risk of 1.6 (95% CI, 1.3 to 2.0) and there was evidence of a highly significant increase in risk with increasing reported alcohol consumption (Mantel extension χ for linear trend = 4.2, P <0.0001).
Alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk.
Breast Cancer Res · 2009 · PMC2797683
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The 300 values of the RMS standard deviations (SD) associated with the three channels of the calibrated and non-calibrated orthophoto were compared by means of a paired Wilcoxon test for non-parametric distributions which reported a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) between the calibrated and non-calibrated images ( Table 3 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The relative proportion of C>T/G>A changes was highly significant compared to other nucleotide changes (p < 0.0001, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance) and formed 32% of all nucleotide changes overall, a proportion that was double what was expected due to chance.