“highly significant”

Geometric morphometrics Investigations into shape differences revealed highly significant shape differences ( P < 0.0001) between polar bear individuals sampled in the west (from both Kane Basin and Baffin Bay management units) and east (from the East Greenland management unit).

An analysis of the level of interconnectivity of the 108 proteins revealed that they are indeed highly connected to each other (84 protein-protein interactions), and that this interconnectivity is highly significant compared to the theoretical interconnectivity computed from resampled networks (resampling test, n = 10, 000, p-value < 10 -4 , additional file 8 ).

Table 8 shows that based on Model 2 instead of Model 1, 16.5% of those developing a CVD event would have moved up to the 'high risk' category of ≥20% while of those not having a CVD event 9.4% would have moved to this risk category, the difference of which is highly significant (p < 0.0001).

With a highly significant overall model ( p < 0.0001, F = 235.71) and a robust signal-to-noise ratio (46.08), the model reliably explains the variability in the response variable ( Table ).

of apoptotic cells from 20 μM to 120 μM compound concentration in MCF-7 breast cancer cells and it is highly significant at 100 μM and 120 μM in 5c ( P < 0.0001), 5g ( P < 0.0011, P < 0.0012), 5h ( P < 0.0001) and 5i ( P < 0.0004, P < 0.0010) treated MCF-7 cells ( Fig. 6 ).

However, the columellar length × niche interaction is highly significant ( F 2,121 = 15.26, p < 0.0001), indicating that the allometric slope varies among ecological groups.

The asterisks (****) denote statistically significant differences, indicating that the improvement in walking distance at each post-procedural time point is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Statistical analysis indicated highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) between N3 and N3-O formulations, confirming that sonication significantly enhances the antimicrobial activity of Ni2CoS4 HSs across both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens.

Results An increased amount of bone was measured from the crest to the apical portion of the dentate sites on the buccal and lingual sides of both jaws with a highly significant difference detected among all the tested points ( P < 0.0001).

The differences observed revealed a highly significant increase in the size measurements made between visit 1 and visit 8 samples (p < 0.0001) (Figure 3 B) using Wilcoxon’s matched pairs test to measure significance.

The value of glcH expression observed at 5 nM glucose was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The correlations among parental genetic ancestries and heterozygosity provided highly significant pairwise r-values (p <0.0001), thus bringing support to using heterozygosity as an indicator of genetic ancestry.

Over the entire data set, the difference between the QMEAN scores assigned to mesophilic and thermophilic proteins is highly significant ( P = 0.0001, see Table 3 ).

This analysis revealed a highly significant effect of condition, F (2, 78) = 19.2, P < 0.0001.

Our sample size justification is supported by prior work [ 27 ], which identified 57 differentially expressed miRNAs in the hippocampal dentate gyrus of stressed rats, with several (e.g., miR-204-5p, miR-1298, miR-143-3p, miR-34c-5p) showing log2 fold changes of ≥ 1 and highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) using only 7–8 animals per group.

The test for subgroup differences was highly significant ( P < .0001), confirming that the type of control treatment substantially influenced the magnitude of mPFS benefit associated with osimertinib.

Both speed differences between the tests were statistically highly significant (MWU test, U[s] = 109 and U[CPS] = 33; p < 0.0001).

Conversely, highly significant differences were observed comparing NMRs between the LICs ( P <0.0001: ET vs.

The model was found to be highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001).

Its frequency was significantly higher in Rufiji than in Kilombero-Ulanga between 2001 and 2002, yet the increase of this allele during 2001- 2002 period was highly significant in both Kilombero-Ulanga (p ≤ 0.0001) and Rufiji (p ≤ 0.0001).

Combining the pollinator catches for each sampling week showed a highly significant difference (F 6, 890 = 29.4, p < 0.0001) among the sampling weeks, with a steady increase from the first sampling week (25.25 ± 3.79) through the fifth week, with the highest peak occurring on week six (154.75 ± 19.90) ( Figure 3 ).

To compare multiple independent groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used, which showed highly significant statistical differences ( p < 0.0001) for all the kinetic and morphological parameters studied.

Highly significant differences in the transmission rate (% C Las-positive inoculated leaves) were found between various lines ( Table 6 , P = 0.0001).

Highly significant improvement of the relevant symptoms was shown for all eight bladder symptoms (all p < 0.0001).

Intra-group comparison of PPD and CAL in the three anxiety levels showed increased periodontal destruction with an increase in anxiety levels, the results being statistically highly significant for PPD differences in smokers (P < 0.0001).