“highly significant”

Acetic acid A highly significant effect was observed due to species (3wAN: F 1,4,2,22 = 9.9, p < 0.0001), with little to no effect on U. intestinalis and the largest effect seen in P. palmata .

Results There was a highly significant fall in mean FeNO of 51.7% over 2 weeks ( p < 0.0001) accompanied by significant improvements in mean FEV 1 , ACQ6 and ASX scores.

In fact, cladistic analyses, indicating that the appendix has evolved independently at least twice (once in diprotodont marsupials and once in Euarchontoglires), show a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) phylogenetic signal in its distribution, and has been maintained in mammalian evolution for 80 millions years or longer [ 15 ].

Increases in growth velocity were highly significant for participants with a baseline growth velocity <5 cm/year (n = 14, p < 0.0001) but were not significant for those whose baseline growth velocity was above this cut-off (n = 10, p = 0.13).

SPLS model coupled with PFS analysis indicate highly significant difference at 6-month between the two patient strata for MM (100% R vs 15% NR, p<0.0001) and mUC (80% R vs 20% NR, p<0.01).

Analysis of variance showed highly significant variation due to year-by-genotype interaction effects ( p < 0.0001) in both HRP and CGP ( Table 2 ).

Overall, the effect of visual condition (EC/ EO) was highly significant ( F = 55.6, p < 0.0001), whereas there were no significant interactions between (a) subjects group (PSP, IPD, CTR) and visual condition (EC/EO, F = 0.63, p = 0.53), and (b) segment, subject group, and visual condition ( F = 0.54, p = 0.70, Figures 3b , c , g , h , m , n ).

The average decrease in fat mass was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), as were decreases in percent body fat and body mass index.

In subsequent visits up to the fifth visit, both chlorpromazine and risperidone showed a gradual decline in the mean score of the symptoms to the extent of 20 for chlorpromazine and 14 for risperidone, which were highly significant ( P =0.0001).

Similarly, the difference in a mean reduction in Y-BOCS scores was also highly significant at p=0.0001 (t=12.857, r=0.803; t=11.488, r=0.803 in men and women, respectively).

The test showed a highly significant result for the severity variable in the model ( Χ 2 = 1989.9; p ≤ 0.0001).

While tool rotation speed alone did not emerge as a significant factor ( p = 0.0885), suggesting a nuanced influence on UTS, its quadratic term was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating a complex, nonlinear relationship with UTS.

The data presented in Figures 1(a) and 1(b) demonstrates that there was a highly significant increase in the expression of miR-181a-5p (4.56 ± 0.92-fold change, p < 0.0001) and miR-125b-2-3p (6.39 ± 0.68-fold change, p < 0.0001) in maternal peripheral blood of the RH-HDFN group compared with the control group.

The results from the ANOVA table revealed that the model was highly significant (P < 0.0001), while the lack of fit of each model was not significant (P > 0.05) revealing that the model adequately described the relationship between the independent variables (extraction time, solid to solvent ratio, % NADES content and amplitudes) and the dependent variables (TPC and DPPH).

While PET/CT was performed significantly more often in small PAs (P<0.01), it showed highly significant superiority over the other imaging modalities in accurate preoperative localization in both small (P<0.0001) and large PAs (P<0.01).

There was a strong correlation between vertical and volume loss; this correlation was highly significant ( r 2 = 0.99 for Tetric Ceram, TEC and Gradia Direct Posterior; p = 0.0001; Fig. 4 ).

The ANOVA results demonstrated that the quadratic model was highly significant (F-value = 152.61, P < 0.0001), with a non-significant lack-of-fit term (F-value = 1.74, P = 0.2971), confirming the model’s adequacy.

However, that pattern was reversed for the 509 genes down-regulated by EWSR1/FLI1: E2F3 binding was not ( P > 0.3; n = 131) associated, but EWSR1/FLI1 binding was highly significant ( P < 10 −4 ; n = 374).

Considering all five species, the difference between the years is highly significant for O. kevoensis (χ 2 = 69.5, P < 0.0001), whereas in O. inclinans the difference is only marginally so (χ 2 = 4.6, P = 0.03).

Loss of p53 function produced a highly significant reduction in time to reach humane endpoints - median survival (Fig. 5D ; median 34.5 days vs 90 days; p < 0.0001).

4 a) showed a highly significant interaction between culture medium and initial inoculum concentration ( p < 0.0001), indicating that the effect of inoculum depended on the culture medium.

Thus, while the mean IOP reduction among the Black and Indian subgroups was highly significant (p < 0.0001), so was the difference between these subgroups (p < 0.001).

There was a highly significant effect of group on the accuracy difference (M - W), as indicated by ANOVA (F (2, 138) = 48.96, p < 0.0001).

In contrast, GC-2A induced a powerful and highly significant ( p < 0.0001) proliferative response across its entire tested concentration range (0.01–0.50 μg/μL).

All cortical brain regions showed highly significant correlations irrespective of the early-phase FBB time frame or the particular reference region (p < 0.0001).