“highly significant”

Outcomes Symptom Scores Improved by Healing Pre- and post-treatment scores are summarized as median (interquartile ranges) in Table 2 , which shows changes that were highly significant statistically (all P < 0.0004) towards improvement during the study period.

Furthermore, if one defines any performance either above or below two standard deviations of the control mean as unusual for each measure, the difference between the number of “unusual observations” for the ASD group and controls was highly significant (median ASD = 8.0; median controls = 3.0; U = 83.5, p = 0.0004).

Conversely, when only products containing 50% or more nuts and seeds were evaluated, the changes in score when compared with the original HSR scores were highly significant for all scenarios ( p value = 0.0004, 0.0013 and 0.0098 for scenarios S1, S2 and S3, respectively).

As expected, schizophrenia patients showed highly significant, large effect-size (p=.0004, d=1.0) deficits in MMN generation across deviant types.

To conclude that the effect of age was different in cases and controls, the interaction between age and affection status was included in the analysis: the interaction was highly significant (beta = 0.27, P = 4.0 × 10 −4 ).

The rMED score showed a highly significant positive linear correlation with “understanding of diabetes” ( p = 0.0004).

Also of note, 20 significant correlations were detected between selected outcomes including a moderate and highly significant correlation ( R = 0.59, p < 0.0004) between axial hypersensitivity and disc nerve sprouting.

We also assessed the correlation between EPC-CFUs and FMD% in all patients and found a highly significant correlation between ΔFMD% and ΔEPC-CFUs ( P = 0.0004, R = 0.68, Pearson correlation; Fig. 3 C).

For the primary motor outcome, the MDS-UPDRS Part III, the LMM revealed a highly significant main effect of Time (F(2,36) = 9.54, p = 0.0004), indicating overall motor improvement in both treatment groups.

When the TTRS was included, the goodness of fit of the multivariable model was highly significant (R 2 = 0.84, p = 0.0004; LoF p = 0.99), and the variables significantly associated with the CFR were BCS ( p = 0.004), the skeletal score ( p < 0.0001) and the TTRS itself ( p = 0.008).

T CM /T EM ratio has been used to reflect the differentiation status of T cells ( 38 ), We therefore compared this parameter before and after GC treatment and found a highly significant increase ( P = 0.0004) of the T CM /T EM ratio among CD8 + T cells after GC treatment ( Figure 7C ).

325.6 ± 248.8 pg/ml, P = 0.04) but a highly significant difference on d7 (211.3 ± 169.1 vs. 82.42 ± 33.6 pg/ml, P = 0.0004) and d14 (381.8 ± 231.6 vs. 59.03 ± 20.1 pg/ml, P < 0.0001) of ET.

This led to a highly significant risk of DVT (OR = 10.1; 95%CI = 2.23-45.9; p = 0.0004) which was higher than that described in the study by Morelli et al.

The difference in specific binding was highly significant (p = 0.0004).

This finding was not anticipated prior to the study, and the difference between the HFA and control groups was highly significant ( p <0.0004).

As shown in Table 2 , after adjusting for the highly significant class variable (p = .0004) of the current DRG category, no differences could be demonstrated among the hospitals (p = .27).

Results: The results of this screening study showed that ADHD is highly significant associated with gender (p = 0.0004).

Group × time interactions were highly significant for LV dimensions, both LVIDd (F (4,40) = 6.57, p = 0.0004) and LVIDs (F (4,40) = 6.76, p = 0.0003), reflecting progressive dilatation in the MI-only group and attenuated increases in chamber size in the MI + HIIT group, with minimal changes in non-infarcted groups.

In peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of JIA patients, the percentage of CD24 hi CD38 hi Bregs was 2.41 ± 0.27%, while this percentage was 0.04 ± 0.02% in SFMCs, which was highly significant ( p = 0.0004).

The levels of VLDLR-AS1 were lower in the rmTBI samples compared to the no lifetime TBI samples, and this difference was highly significant ( p = 0.0004), indicating that VLDLR-AS1 is a strong, viable indicator of rmTBI.

In temporal GM, the overall association between normalised S1P level and Braak stage was highly significant (p = 0.0004).

However, since significant terms were highly significant ( p <0.0004 in all cases) and non-significant terms were highly non-significant ( p >0.1259 in all cases), there is no ambiguity in the results.

Melioidosis antibody titer was tested in 64 (77%) and there was a highly significant association of high titers >1:160 with the presence of DM (p=0.0004).

This difference is highly significant (p<.0004, Fisher’s exact test, two-tailed); furthermore, the sole novel nonsynonymous variant detected in an African-American POAG case ( Table 3 ) was not predicted to be pathogenic.

The Karolinska Sleepiness score significantly decreased after the nap-chair rest, and the between-treatment difference in the decrease was highly significant ( P = 0.0004).