Intriguingly, however, we observed a modest, yet highly significant positive correlation between FBXW7 and MYC expression, exclusively in the Luminal A-subtype of breast cancers (rho=0.28, p=0.0004) (Figure 4A ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Group × time interactions were highly significant for LV dimensions, both LVIDd (F (4,40) = 6.57, p = 0.0004) and LVIDs (F (4,40) = 6.76, p = 0.0003), reflecting progressive dilatation in the MI-only group and attenuated increases in chamber size in the MI + HIIT group, with minimal changes in non-infarcted groups.
The difference in the response rate was highly significant between the three groups (χ2 = 15.8, df = 2, p = 0.0004), with the group sent the incentive responding 61% of the time, compared with 48% for those promised the incentive, and 43% for those without incentive (see Table 1 ).
ADHD is highly significant associated with gender (p = 0.0004).
2–6 d old (= pooled 2–3 d old and 4–6 d old nestlings) and 7–9 d old nestlings, still showed highly significant differences between these two groups of nestlings (MANOVA, in each case P ≤ 0.0004; for Age, df = 3 and 87.0; and for Brood identity(Age), df = 3 and 256.04).
The joint test statistic is highly significant ( P =0.0004), more so in fact than either of its components.
This level of overlapping is highly significant ( P = 4E-4, χ 2 test).
There was a highly significant correlation (p = 0.0004) between M. tuberculosis presence in the larvae and the absence of treatment ( Figure S2 ).
Both were found to be positively correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.479) and this correlation was highly significant ( P = 0.0004).
The Karolinska Sleepiness score significantly decreased after the nap-chair rest, and the between-treatment difference in the decrease was highly significant ( P = 0.0004).
The pivot shift test emerged as the strongest predictor of surgeon agreement, showing highly significant results ( p = 0.0004).
Mirtazapine was also a highly significant suppressor of the histamine response when evaluating median wheal size for monotherapy compared to controls ( p = 0.0004) (Table 3 ).
2 in which differences between the curves, estimated by log-rank test, are statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0004).
Considering UND patients, we observed a highly significant prevalence in group 1 than in group 2 both at 1 month (83 vs. 16, p = 0.0004) and at 2 months (76 vs. 7, p < 0.0001).
The sexual difference was highly significant (P=0.0004, by one-way ANOVA).
ANOVA analysis revealed a highly significant difference between the various year groups ( F = 8.722; df = 3, 25; P = 0.0004) in the forest zone ( Fig. 3B ).
In our comprehensive analyses of 1422 TCS with state-of-the-art audiologic testing, cisplatin showed a highly significant dose-response relationship with hearing loss (p = 0.0004).
The association was found to be statistically highly significant (p = 0.0004).
At the aetiology level, it is worth noting that in the traumatic brain injury group, we found a highly significant link between number of hypo-CDP voxels (r s = − 0.80, p = 0.0004) and the CRS-R score ( Fig. 6 .A).
of borderline significancep = 0.03
When analysed separately, there was a highly significant association between haemoglobin and serum ferritin in patients with ID ( r = 0.16, p = 0.0004), whereas in patients without ID, this association was only of borderline significance ( r = −0.09, p = 0.03).
There was no difference in the slopes ( P = 0.58), but the difference in elevation was highly significant ( P = 0.0004), indicating that WT and M/Mt-CK −/− hearts do not share the same relationship for d P /d t max versus heart rate, but instead run in parallel (i.e. for any given heart rate, d P /d t max is lower in M/Mt-CK −/− hearts).
The conditional sums of squares of E a estimates revealed highly significant interspecific differences in the temperature dependency of both GP max ( F = 4.4; P -value = 0.0004) and NP max ( F = 8.4; P -value < 0.0001).
1.31 ± 0.99 mg/mL, respectively; p = 0.1016), with a highly significant increase on day 3 taking into consideration the baseline status ( p = 0.0004) ( Table 2 ).
Over the finishing period (10–22 weeks of age), there was a highly significant difference between both vaccinated groups and the NC group ( p = 0.0004), but not between the PCVM and FLEX groups (see Table 4 ).
At the end of 12 weeks, there was a highly significant ( P = 0.0004) 20 m placebo-corrected median improvement in 6MWD.