Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP = 9.99 × 10 –40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For schizophrenia, the statistical analysis revealed that 25 out of the top 30 gene pairs shared at least one Biological Process (BP) pathway, and the observed enrichment is highly significant ( P = 9.99 × 10 –4 , computed as ( w + 1)/(1,000 + 1) where no background iterations reached ≥ 25, thus w = 0) compared to random expectations.
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The correlation between measured and simulated FT4 values was highly significant (Spearman’s rho=0.882, p<0.001, see Figure 4 ). 3.3 Computer Aided Thyroid Treatment Framework The established mathematical model was implemented in software packages to perform numerical simulation studies.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
:​​ The Red module displayed the greatest shift in ME value within hybrid BC98, changing from ME = 0.33 at the AN stage to ME=−0.27 at the GF stage (ΔME = 0.60), the largest ΔME observed among all modules; (3) ​​Significant Genotype × Developmental Stage interaction:​​ Multifactor ANOVA confirmed a highly significant interaction effect for both modules (Brown: F = 12.65, p < 0.001; Red: F = 8.96, p = 0.003), strongly linking their expression patterns to heterosis and developmental transition.
highly significantp ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Incidence of Citrus Canker and Huanglongbing In regard to citrus canker incidence on harvested fruits, a highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) interaction was observed between the 19 late-season sweet orange selections and the two assessed harvest seasons, 2020 and 2021 ( Table 8 ).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Effect of Chrysin on the Weight Gain and Liver Index in High-Fructose-Induced NAFLD in Rats ( Figure 3 ) Rats fed with high fructose showed a highly significant weight gain compared to the normal control (86.14 ± 6.57 vs. 44 ± 6.76, P < 0.001).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
On intergroup comparison, it was found that there was a statistically significant difference in terms of marginal adaptation ( P = 0.024) and retention ( P = 0.023), while a highly significant difference was observed in terms of surface texture and anatomic form ( P < 0.001) at the end of 1 year [ Table 1 ].
highly significantP<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A highly significant higher level of sCD200 was found among cases as compared to controls (P<0.001), while a significantly lower level of CD200 R expression on both lymphocytes and monocytes was detectable in cases as compared to controls (P < 0.001 in both instances) Table 1 .