“highly significant”

The association between knowledge score and practices was highly significant ( P <0.001).

The difference between the groups was statistically highly significant (p <0.001).

Again, this analysis showed that genotype was highly significant ( F 1,49 = 14.34, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.226) while neither group ( F 1,49 = 0.060, p = 0.807) nor the interaction ( F 1,49 = 0.0205, p = 0.887) were statistically significant.

On days 3 and day 5, the difference between histamine and the control groups as well as between histamine and cimetidine groups was highly significant (P < 0.001).

Differences between the treatment group on day 7 and (i) the untreated control on day 7 and (ii) the treatment group at day 0 were highly significant (p < 0.001 in a Mann-Whitney-U test and a Wilcoxon Matched Paired Signed Rank test).

All PhiPTs were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

In these data, Gene Set Enrichment Analyses (GSEA) revealed highly significant (p<0.001) correlations of CYB5R1 mRNA expression and the expression of two published core EMT gene signatures [ 17 , 18 ], strongly linking CYB5R1 and EMT (Figure 3A ).

The analysis revealed a strong response in the cells to MYO1C over-expression in form of a highly significant ( P < 0.001) decrease in the number of live cells starting at 48 hours post transfection and throughout the experiment time span ( Fig 3D ).

Cis/Fen/Az-treated mice showed a highly significant difference in survival when compared to all other groups, on average they survived 27.44 days ( p < 0.001), whereas Cis/Fen- and Cis/Az-treated mice registered an average survival of 16.3 and 17.25 days respectively, thus only slightly longer and with no statistical significance when compared to treatment with cisplatin alone (14.7 days) ( Figure 1 C,D).

The differences were highly significant (observers 1, 2 and 3: P = 0.001, P < 0.001 and P = 0.011, respectively).

Then, we assessed the automated analysis result of seed segmentation against manually counted seed number and seed object regions from 100 seed lots, obtaining a highly significant positive correlation (R 2 = 0.996, RMSE = 0.656, P -value < 0.001; mIoU = 0.947; Supplementary Figure S4 ).

Female mouse white blood cell indices: The percentage of lymphocytes in the commercial feed control group showed a statistical difference, with the wild Mongolian beef MG-MT 10% group decreasing ( P = 0.047, P = 0.017) compared to the control group; the eosinophil count in the commercial feed control group showed a highly significant statistical difference, with the MSTN gene-edited beef MG-MT 30% group increasing ( P < 0.001) compared to the control group.

Patients with Mild COVID-19 infection associated with good OS as compared to patients with Moderate and Severe COVID-19 infected patients with a highly significant p = 0.001.

The statistical analysis demonstrated a highly significant association ( p = 0.001) between the type of stimulation and responses to the “other changes” category in the questionnaire.

Discussion In this study, a highly significant negative correlation ( r = –0.992, P = 0.001) was observed between DM accumulation and the R/FR ratio in the different spectral profiles provided by the different colored films, indicating that the DM accumulation was greatly affected by far-red light in G. longituba .

We found 27 misophonics (21.4%) scored 32 or above compared to only 7 controls (2.8%), and this difference was highly significant ( χ2 (1) = 33.62, p < .001).

FMV-RNN-AE shows highly significant improvements over all single-view baselines ( p < 0.001) and all multi-view baselines ( p < 0.01).

For Patient 18, both models show highly significant causality (very large F -statistics and p < 0.001 ), indicating that changes in Δ T robustly precede changes in pain scores.

FibroScan values, APRI score, and FIB4 score correlated with each other highly significant (R = 0.218–0.754; P < 0.001).

When QT intervals were corrected for heart rate, [ 27 ] as shown in Figure 5H , the difference between the control and the mGpTx1 treatment animals were also highly significant (n = 8, p < 0.001): QTc intervals were 0.07 ± 0.01 s and 0.12 ± 0.01 s, respectively; and T‐wave amplitude was significantly decreased after treatment with 0.3 mg kg −1 mGpTx1 (control: 0.20 ± 0.03 mV; mGpTx1: 0.09 ± 0.02 mV; n = 8, p = 0.0138).

Results were highly consistent with those of the chi-square analyses: participant commitment remained highly significant ( p < 0.001), frequent appointments remained significant ( p = 0.02), and language barriers showed borderline significance ( p = 0.05).

Results were evaluated for statistical significance by ANOVA using a two-tailed Tukey-Kramer approach for multiple comparisons (highly significant ***p < 0.001; very significant **p < 0.01; significant *p < 0.05; not significant ns, p > 0.05).

Compositionally distinct but overlapping communities There was a highly significant compositional difference among biotopes (Adonis test: F 13, 201 = 6.64, R 2 = 0.293, P < 0.001; Fig. 3a ).

The surgeon satisfaction score assessed at the end of surgery was 4.34 ± 0.745 and 3.47 ± 0.5 in groups B and A, respectively, and the difference is highly significant (P < 0.001).

Genome-wide differentially DNA methylation genes profiling in PCOS Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis showed 6936 differentially methylated CpG sites (p<0.005) respectively between control and PCOS-obesity group and 2664 CpG sites exhibited highly significant (P<0.001, Supplementary Dataset 1A ).