Analysis of variance showed highly significant differences in the age of patients stratified according to the site of the tumour (F 3,1582 =6.7, p<0.001), and SNK range testing revealed this was due to the ‘Upper’ oesophagus group being significantly (p<0.05) different from all the other groups which were statistically indistinguishable—the identity difference is indicated in table 1 by the boxes around the median ages for each site group.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Overall, this resulted in a highly significant difference in LTP in control mice (F 1,13 = 120.105; p < 0.001, repeated measures (RM)-ANOVA) underlining an essential function of AMPK in long-term synaptic plasticity.
In addition, a highly significant negative correlation between wall thickness and ADC was observable in the ex vivo measurements (r = -0.615, p < 0.001).
This result shows a highly significant 84% reduction in transmission efficiency compared to the wild-type TNJ4 (23.6 ± 1.7%, P < 0.001).
Hazard ratios were highly significant ( p < 0.001) indicating the risk of a severely dysplastic lesion developing carcinoma was 81.8 (95% CI 10.5, 635.9) times higher than for a non-dysplastic lesion (Table 4 ).
This is a total of 37 tests performed on 25 variables, having five significant values, of which one was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The ROC curve for RPW and secretory activity, with area under curve (AUC) 0.813, 95%CI (0.672–0.953), was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001), and the cut-off value was 47.5% and above, with a sensitivity of 73.3%, 95%CI (44.9–92.0%), and the specificity was 86.2%, 95%CI (68.3–96.0%).
5 ) revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) difference in gold content after cell treatment with 5a and 5b,c for 6 h.
The overall model fit was highly significant [ F (4, 208) = 1933, P < 0.001], suggesting that these variables are strong predictors of pupil constriction amplitude after high luminance light exposure (Table 2 ).
Results In this study; the diabetic group showed statistically highly significant decrease in the average RV-GLS (−14.0 ± 6.9 in group 1 vs. −22.7 ± 2.5 in group 2, P < 0.001), significant decrease in RV S velocity (9.5 ± 2.2 in group 1 vs. 11.5 ± 1.8 in group 2, P < 0.05), significantly reduced E/A ratio (1.0 ± 0.2 in group 1 vs. 1.1 ± 0.1 in group 2, P < 0.05), and highly significant increased E/Em ratio (7.9 ± 3.2 in group 1 vs. 5.2 ± 0.7 in group 2, P < 0.001).
From 2009 to 2010, there was a highly significant ( P < 0.001) decrease in the mean rate of hospitalizations for TB in the Centre and North subgroups vs. a significant ( P < 0.05) decrease in the East, South and South-West subgroups.
As expected, the conventional parameter showed a highly significant stratification of survival data with log-rank test, in detail histological subtype (RFS p < 0.001; OS p = 0.002), T-category, N-category, grading, lymphovascular and hemangioinvasion (each RFS p < 0.001; OS p < 0.001).
Statistical significance is denoted as follows: P < 0.05 for significant differences, P < 0.01 for highly significant differences, P < 0.001 for very highly significant differences, and “ns” for nonsignificant differences.
We found a significant endophyte effect ( F 1,28 = 5.084, P = 0.032), a highly significant herbivore effect ( F 1,28 = 50.178, P < 0.001) and no significant interaction effect ( F 1,28 = 1.632, P = 0.212) on shoot fresh weight.
Individual comparisons of Faces to each stimulus category (birds, cars, phones, and scrambled faces) revealed highly significant effects (all p < 0.001).
Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were observed between environments and environment by line interactions (Table S8 ).
Correlation of the magnitude of differential expression of the differentiation signature genes derived in vitro ( n = 1763) with corresponding changes in a subset of the LG and HG cell lines grown as xenografts revealed a highly significant correlation ( r = 0.92, P < 0.001, Fig. 8A ) confirming differentiation-related transcriptional differences observed in vitro are largely retained when the cell lines are grown in vivo.
A two-way ANOVA found that fermentation time, pH and their associated interaction have a highly significant effect on both EA and ES (p<0.001).
The Mann-Whitney test demonstrated a highly significant difference in these salivary pH values ( P < 0.001).
Heterogeneity analysis was highly significant for the presence of heterogeneity in the sample, as expected ( I [ 2 ] = 99%, P < 0.001).
Correlation between integral and peak RLUs A highly significant correlation (correlation coefficient, R = 0.995, P < .001) was observed between integral and peak CL responses, irrespective of the treatments administered ( Figure 2 ).
A highly significant inverse relationship between MSI and p53 status was observed (p = 0.001).
According to the Spearman rank correlation test, co-expression of mammaglobin A and lipophilin B was highly significant in breast, uterine and ovarian tissues (each p < 0.001) but failed to reach significance in cervical tissues due to the small sample size (n = 2).
For each unit increase in NLR, the risk of mortality increases by approximately 9.1% (Model 1), 9.8% (Model 2), and 15.0% (Model 3), all highly significant with P < 0.001.
The results demonstrated a highly significant reduction (P < 0.001) in total purine content after soaking, with a nearly 50 % decrease observed.