“highly significant”

CLM-Net’s Kaplan-Meier curves again displayed a clear and consistent separation between the groups, with the log-rank test yielding a highly significant P value ( P <.001), confirming the model’s stability and discriminative power.

Near add power requirements decreased significantly in both groups, from 1.34 ± 0.33 DS to 0.95 ± 0.24 DS in Group A (29.7% reduction) and from 1.36 ± 0.38 DS to 0.84 ± 0.25 DS in Group B (37.8% reduction), with the between-group difference being highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The association between this variable and motivation levels was highly significant [ χ 2 (16) = 105.58, p < 0.001, Cramér’s V = 0.14], supporting the hypothesis that ‘higher usage frequency leads to stronger learning motivation’, which aligns with the theoretical connotations of the “Relevance” and “Satisfaction” dimensions in the ARCS model.

A mixed-design ANOVA on the total efficacy score indicated a highly significant main effect of Time, F (1, 479) = 311.17, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.39.

Specifically, it demonstrated the largest and most highly significant positive predictive effect on both Social Responsibility ( β = 0.344, p < 0.001 ) and Prosocial Behavior ( β = 0.271, p < 0.001 ).

The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation between nitrogen application rate and dry matter quality score (β = 0.658, p = 0.004) in 2021, and a highly significant positive correlation between nitrogen application rate and dry matter quality score (β = 1.435, p = 0.001) in 2022 (Table S1).

The model also illustrates that education remains highly significant, with higher education, secondary and primary education groups showing ORs of 2.693, 2.672 and 1.474, respectively (p<0.001 for secondary and higher education).

The interaction was highly significant ( P <0.001), supporting the SEM result that the effect of larval size on pupal size was strongly modulated by salinity condition ( Table S2 ).

Bartlett’s test was also highly significant, χ 2 (45) = 1668.659, p < 0.001, rejecting the null hypothesis that the correlation matrix is an identity matrix and confirming that the inter-item correlations are sufficient to justify factor analysis.

In terms of sequence identity, all three clades show highly significant genetic divergence from each other (all P < 0.001), indicating they have evolved into three distinct genetic lineages.

For example, Pb shows a highly significant correlation with Cd (r = 0.914, p < 0.001), Cr (r = 0.678, p < 0.001), Cu (r = 0.784, p < 0.001), Ni (r = 0.679, p < 0.001), Sr (r = 0.459, p < 0.05), and Zn (r = 0.842, p < 0.001).

Smooth term analysis indicated that temporal trends were highly significant in the polluted site (Ambient, polluted: edf = 5.777, p < 0.001; Warmed, polluted: edf = 5.818, p < 0.001), but were non‐significant in the non‐polluted site (SI Table S16 ). 3.2.4 Green Microalgae Concentration For green microalgae, only the June data provided sufficient variation to fit a GLM; on all subsequent sampling dates, concentrations were essentially zero.

Mandibular cortical index Chi-square analysis revealed a highly significant association between Mandibular Cortical Index (MCI) categories and study groups ( p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

One-way ANOVA showed a highly significant difference among EDC severity groups (F = 47.3, p < 0.001).

significant myelin‐specific DTH responses were not observed in mice tested at early times post‐infection (which had only recently developed clinical scores indicative of demyelinating disease), but highly significant ( P <0.001) responses were observed in chronically‐diseased animals (nine mice tested 36–48 weeks following infection).

The linear regression shown was highly significant ( P < 0.001) with r 2 = 0.97.

It was highly significant ( P <0.001) in control after 8 days of stress (Figure 3 ).

Results: The mean OHI-S score for case and control group was 3.98 ± 0.70 and 3.11 ± 0.68, respectively, which was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The difference was even more pronounced for women, 253±73 mg for MDRD4 compared with 186±105 mg for CG old (+36%) and less for men, 267±77 mg for MDRD4 compared with 234±94 mg for CG old (+14%), but still highly significant (p<0.001).

Management method significantly affected BD and SP ( p < 0.05) but not MC, while management duration exerted highly significant effects on all three parameters ( p < 0.001) ( Figure S1 and Table S1 ).

The overall survival analysis across the three groups was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

However, there was a highly significant difference in the total scores according to the presence or absence of AOS (p < 0.001), and while the inter-rater reliability for some individual items was low, the inter-rater reliability for the total score was high at an excellent range.

Using the ANOVA test, the difference was statistically highly significant with p < 0.001 (Table 2 ).

We verified this by testing the overlap between the TF motif-gene cis -regulations inferred by MLC as applied to the LiCAT-seq human embryonic development dataset, 38 and the cis -regulations inferred by MethCorTarget applied to the DNAme human embryonic development dataset 39 : we found a highly significant overlap, odds ratio OR = 13.3 ( 12.9 − 13.8 ) ( p < 0.001 , Fisher’s exact test).

For E P and E , one-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences ( F = 40.59 and F = 19.13, respectively; both p < 0.001).