“highly significant”

The finding that services were perceived as “unaffordable” was highly significant ( p < 0.001) and was associated with a large negative coefficient (−2.270762).

However, normalizing PI:C for HOMA2-IR unveiled a highly significant hyperbolic correlation (r s = -0.596; P <0.001) with AUC 5-10min C-peptide, andalso with AUC 120-150min C-peptide, only available for age 12–39 years (n = 31; r s = -0.529; P = 0.002) ( Fig 2C ).

The genotypes showed very highly significant differences ( p< 0.001) was measured in each and across environments at all growth stages.

The allele (A12DHd or GDDH33) present at this locus has a highly significant ( P < 0.001) effect on the ABA content of that line (Figs 5 a, S5b).

The minimal model for fur and skin, which included age categories 1–3 as a factor, explained 42.74% ( p < 0.001) and 22.23% ( p < 0.05) of data variability, respectively, with a highly significant difference found between age groups 1 and 3 ( p < 0.001) and no difference between groups 1 and 2 (Fig. 2a, b ).

A one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of classifier type on accuracy in the Delta band, F(5, 24) = 184.79, p < .001, η2 = 0.97, indicating a large effect size.

School public areas also highly significant for both Portuguese and Mathematics [ χ ( M ) 2 = 25.83, p < 0.001; χ ( P ) 2 = 28.18, p < 0.001].

PitNETs/adenomas demonstrated a highly significant positive correlation with the NET-like signature ( r = 0.74, p < 0.001) and a negative correlation with the adenoma-like signature ( r = −0.5, p < 0.001; Fig. 2 B + C, Supplementary Table 2 ).

3 Results 3.1 Variability of the genotypes for weevil damage parameters All genotypes expressed highly significant differences (P<0.001) for weevil damage at the periphery, cross section, overall total damage, and larvae recovered in pots, whereas adult weevils were not significant (P<0.14).

Differences between the two groups in terms of outcomes were highly significant ( p = 0.001) [ 45 ].

Multivariate logistic regression analysis for the prediction of the risk of cardiotoxicity among survivors is shown in Table 5 There was a statistically significant relation between height, BMI, and CLEF4 rs1786814 genotype and the risk of cardiotoxicity ( P = 0.03) with a highly significant difference in cumulative anthracycline dose >300 mg/m 2 and GG genotype and the risk of cardiotoxicity ( P < 0.001).

Compared with the Glu group (negative control), all the biomarkers in the DOX group were increased, and the LDH level exhibited a highly significant difference (*** p < 0.001), indicating severe heart injury.

Using a two-way analysis of variance, a highly significant difference was seen in the morphological parameters in response to different yeast concentrations ( p < 0.001), GA concentrations ( p < 0.001), and the interaction between YE and GA treatments ( p < 0.001).

With cross-mapping, it equaled M = 33.28% ( SD = 17.5%), and the difference was highly significant, t (209) = 17.38, p < .001, Cohen’s d = 1.2.

In contrast, there was a highly significant 21.1% difference between mean (±SD) TM-VO 2pred and HRI-VO 2 (8.12±1.85 METs and 6.71±1.92, respectively; p<0.001).

A highly significant positive correlation was obtained between tocopherol content and α-tocopherol (r = 0.97, ***P < 0.001).

ied particularly well, especially after secondary saccades were executed (downward: M = 0.61, SD = 0.06; upward: M = 0.61, SD = 0.08), whereas target motion parallel to the saccade’s direction was classified less accurately in comparison (inward: M = 0.45, SD = 0.07; outward: M = 0.43, SD = 0.10)–a highly significant effect across the sample ( F ( 4 , 36 ) = 27.47 , η 2 = 0.460 , p < .001, p GG <.001).

In a random population sample comprising more than 2,000 individuals, a highly significant ( P <0.001) association was observed between hypertension and glucose intolerance, independent of the potentially confounding effects of age, sex, obesity, and anti-hypertensive medications.

Simple main effect analysis demonstrated that, in controls, differences between self and other were highly significant at Pz ( F 1,20 = 13.85, p = 0.001).

When tested separately, the contra-ipsilateral difference in the detection task was marginally significant, F 1,33 = 3.95, P = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.11, while in the discrimination task, it was highly significant, F 1,33 = 20.29, P < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.38.

The effects of different levels of these factors on the differentiation coefficient of ‘11-C-2’ shoot segments are highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Enteromorpha intestinalis had the highest ash content (58.98% ± 1.75%), very highly significant (p < 0.001) than the other species except no significant difference with C. microphysa (57.21% ± 1.91%), while S. flavicans had the lowest (20.44% ± 0.74%).

Males who reported more than one sexual dysfunction as opposed to none were more likely to report an unintended pregnancy (19% versus 7% p = 0.01); this association was highly significant when considering sexual dysfunction hindering sexuality (37% versus 7%, p <0.001).

5c ; normalized frequency following light activation=15.3±2.8%; highly significant difference from 100%, P <<0.001) and the intensity of the responses to electrical stimulation ( Fig. 5d ; Normalized power, VU, 38.4±12.4; VU+light, 6.1±2.1; P <0.05), even in the continued presence of perfusing VU0463271.

Log-rank testing confirmed highly significant differences in survival distributions among trajectory groups ( P < 0.001 in both cohorts).