“highly significant”

Ethanol (10 mM), a known inducer of CYP2E1 shows highly significant (p<0.001) increase the NDMA-d activity ( Figure 7 ).

This difference was highly significant (bootstrapping test confirming more similar fixation maps within than between fixation classes, p < .001).

In general, significant variations between the two varieties were found ( Table 4 ); the analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).

The association between age group and risk group was found to be highly significant ( p value<0.001).

Correlation among pod set, yield and nut quality traits of BUNSO progeny crosses Highly significant (P < 0.001) and positive correlation was observed between number of pods and pod set, pod weight and pod set, number of nuts per pod and number of pods, number of nuts per pod and pod weight, outturn and pod set, outturn and number of pods, outturn and pod weight, outturn and weight of unpeeled nuts, outturn and weight of peeled nuts (Supplementary Fig.

The PLV of 1ST spikes remains within the 95 percentile of the surrogate distribution for most of the fixation period but shows a highly significant increase ( P < 0.001) at around 60 ms after fixation-onset ( Fig. 8 C , D ).

No parts of the UKCAT proved to be an independent predictor of clinical course marks, whereas prior attainment was a highly significant predictor (p <0.001).

The highly significant differences observed in temporal synergy parameters (e.g., p < 0.001) suggest that dopaminergic medication substantially affects motor coordination, even within this cohort.

However, training demonstrated a highly significant effect ( P < .001), as practitioners who received training scored higher (mean = 70.91, SD = 3.335) compared to those without training (mean = 62.72, SD = 2.963).

5 d), and the difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Weekly differences were highly significant ( F = 3.22, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.51), indicating that age accounted for a substantial portion of variance.

It is remarkable that the expression of BMP-2 in the PLLA group reached a highly significant maximum after 8 weeks (p≤0.001) before decreasing again towards the end of the observation period ( Fig. 8b ).

Authenticity of CoT responses by reasoning-capable LLMs For reasoning authenticity, the Kruskal-Wallis H test demonstrated highly significant differences in physician ratings among the four models ( p < 0.001).

Overall, most covariates were highly significant ( p < 0.001), confirming that the Tweedie GLM effectively captures the variability in insurance claim amounts.

In contrast, grouping factors including species and treatment explained as much as 74.79% of the variation in fungal communities, with a highly significant effect ( R 2 = 0.7479, p = 0.001).

(3) Consistency between C-DOS and C-ONI The two tools demonstrated a highly significant statistical association in binary classification [χ 2 (1) = 200, p < 0.001; OR = 42.8, 95% CI: 20.3–90.2]; however, their agreement was only moderate [κ = 0.50], with 65 cases (9.4%) being classified discordantly.

However, the difference in k d was highly significant ( P < 0.001), supporting the idea that the loss in stability of the Tyr13Phe complex is due to the absence of the hydroxyl bond to Gln54, which would normally stabilize the stacking interaction at position 13, as well as help position the β2–β3 loop in the RNA loop ( 43 ).

Here, we measured the ratio between CRP and platelet counts (vii); a highly significant negative association with survival was found starting at day 10 (r s = −.65, p≤0.001), more so than CRP values alone; a statistically significant difference between 14 day CRP levels in surviving versus non-surviving animals was confirmed in the current study (p<0.05).

3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ) Statistical analysis confirmed these differences to be highly significant (log-rank test, p < 0.001).

Statistical significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05, while p < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and p < 0.001 indicated very highly significant differences.

One-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences among groups (F(3,8) = 3054.65, p < 0.001).

With respect to between-group comparisons, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups in the pretest median Trait Anger scores ( p = 0.291, ES = 0.447, 95% CI: −0.370, 1.250), whereas a highly significant difference was detected between the groups in the posttest median Trait Anger scores ( p < 0.001, ES = 1.481, 95% CI: 0.560, 2.380).

The Chi-square test revealed a highly significant difference ( χ 2 = 20.92, df = 1, P < 0.001), which was further confirmed by Fisher’s exact test ( P = 9.50 × 10 -6 ).

For E P and E , one-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences ( F = 40.59 and F = 19.13, respectively; both p < 0.001).

In addition, the type of closure showed a highly significant difference ( P = 0.001), as extra-peritoneal closure was predominantly used in rectal tumors (78.8%).