“highly significant”

In domesticus individuals, the model predicts an increase in SC of 6.07 × 10 6 associated with the presence of the Y MUS , this effect being highly significant ( p < 0.001, table 1 ).

Results and Discussion A two-way repeated measure ANOVA with dominance and trust as factors (seven levels for each factor) revealed a highly significant main effect of dominance, F (6, 132) = 4.26, p = .001, partial eta squared = .162, Figure 2A , and a significant main effect of trust, F (6, 132) = 3.36, p = .004, partial eta squared = .133; Figure 2B .

Mating System, Effective Density of Pollen Donors and Male Reproductive Variance In the study site, we found a highly significant difference between multilocus and single-locus outcrossing rates ( t m = 0.999 vs. t s = 0.856; Student’s t = 94.466, P <0.001), indicating that about 14% of matings occurred between genetically related plants.

Total Oomycete Structure Area (TSA) The analysis of variance depending on the sampling time showed highly significant (F = 199; P < 0.001) differences for this variable.

Impact was a highly significant predictor, with a beta of 0.57, p <0.001.

Comparison of δ 13 C and δ 15 N values between control specimens in the 800–1000 mm and >1000 mm groups revealed highly significant differences in both carbon and nitrogen isotopic values for Arctic Norway (δ 13 C: t = −5.36, df = 31, p <0.001; δ 15 N: t = −3.00, df = 31, p = 0.005), and a significant increase in δ 13 C with size class for the southern North Sea (t = −2.52, df = 57, p = 0.015).

AIV prevalence and risk comparison for EFGs The anseriforms afro-tropical group represented the only anseriforms present in all three sites and their AIV prevalence was 1.1, 1.2, and 5.0% respectively for BAR, STR & MAN (95% Confidence Intervals being [0.7:1.9], [0.4:1.7], [4:5.9] respectively) differing significantly between MAN and both BAR and STR (both chi-square tests being highly significant, p < 0.001).

Discussion In this study, an unexpected strong association was observed between the adherence to medication and seatbelt fastening when seated in the rear of a car: fastening the seatbelt was found to be a highly significant determinant (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4–3.6, P < 0.001) of adherence to medication by multivariate analysis in a model with good accuracy (area under the ROC curve 0.774), with the same OR as the motivation to adhere to medical prescriptions (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3–3.6, P = 0.003).

There was high severity of periodontitis (for both in terms of CPI and LOA) in the dialysis group as compared with control group that was found to be statistically highly significant ( P <0.001).

Correlations between the various muscle functions were highly significant (all p < 0.001) and were between 0.870 and 0.955.

A total of 72 KEGG pathways showed highly significant enrichment (P <0.001) in this analysis (Table 2 ).

Moreover, the influence of hygiene education and COVID-19 outbreak affecting the duration of handwashing are found highly significant (p-value < 0.001) from the regression analysis.

If the model containing more factors had an improved fit that was highly significant ( P < 0.001), then the factor was retained in the final model.

Symptoms, Mental and Functional), the functional domain remained in the Poisson-model with a highly significant contribution (p=0.001).

For example, at K = 9 the majority of variation (94.32%) is among groups, although 0.03% of variation at the level of among populations within groups still represents highly significant population structuring in the remaining population groups ( P < 0.001).

Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA confirmed a significant effect of treatment ( F 1,9 =6.11, P =0.035) and a highly significant treatment × time interaction ( P <0.001).

We found a highly significant main effect of channel type [ F (52,1) = 25.4, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.08], significant interaction between movie repetition and channel type [ F (52,1) = 6.1, p = 0.017, η 2 = 0.022] and relatively high, but not significant main effect of movie repetition [ F (52,1) = 3.54, p = 0.065, η 2 = 0.02].

First, the distribution mean shifts towards lower values; a comparison of absolute fitness values between Solanaceae and non- Solanaceae hosts indicates that the difference is highly significant (Mann-Whitney test, P <0.001).

Correlations between individual experiments were all positive and highly significant ( p < 0.001) and showed ranges r = 0.44–0.53, 0.37–0.63, and 0.50–0.65 for the DTd, FTd, and HTd populations, respectively.

We observed a highly significant (p<0.001) reduction of ERα binding at all sites examined in RAD21-depleted MCF7 cells ( Figure 6A ), and a similar decrease in ERα binding at ERE 1 and the promoter region in T47D cells ( Figure 7 ).

In a study done by El Baz et al [ 16 ], the malignant cases showed a highly significant increase in the mean percentage of expression of Fas in tissue compared to the chronic cystitis ( P < 0.001) group.

Negative Control Group The cholesterol level, HDL and VLDL showed a non-significant increase when compared with the negative control group, whereas there was a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in triglyceride levels ( Figure 6 ).

Return to theater for same-day D&E 3–4 hours after dilator insertion on Day 2 occurred in 94 of 151 (62.3%) in Dilapan-S cohort C, 14 of 151 (9.3%) in laminaria cohort A, and two of 52 (3.8%) in laminaria cohort B, a highly significant Dilapan-S advantage ( P = 0.001).

Several of the proteins showed a highly significant association with microsatellite instability status including 14-3-3β (χ 2 = 22.441, p<0.001), HSP60 (χ 2 = 27.663, p<0.001) and IDH1 (χ 2 = 47.733, p<0.001).

However, the effect of SOA was highly significant (F (4.8, 86.9) = 48.17, p<.001), as well as the interaction between group and SOA (F (4.8, 86.9) = 15.33, p<.001).