“highly significant”

In terms of sequence identity, all three clades show highly significant genetic divergence from each other (all P < 0.001), indicating they have evolved into three distinct genetic lineages.

Mandibular cortical index Chi-square analysis revealed a highly significant association between Mandibular Cortical Index (MCI) categories and study groups ( p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

Our study exhibited that the F ‐values are highly significant ( p < 0.001) except for agronomic traits such as NPB ( F = 0.443, p = 0.895), NFI ( F = 0.761, p = 0.652), SdWt ( F = 1.972, p = 0.0989), and NSP ( F = 0.70, p = 0.702) which indicates as narrow variability.

A paired t -test comparing the accuracy of the participants in the first training session and the last training session (11 th session) showed a highly significant difference ( t (14) = 4.32, p <0.001), Figure 4 .

The results show that, according to the F -test, there is a significant environmental and genotypic main effect (the F statistic for environments equals 1466.5, and for genotypes 5.3, both of which are highly significant: P < 0.001).

The supplementation of vegetable leaves resulted in a highly significant ( p < 0.001) effect on individual egg mass, with chickens in T3 (65.6 ± 0.5 g) producing heavier eggs compared to those in T1, T2, and T4 ( Table 4 ).

Results Echocardiography assessment at 9 weeks post-MI demonstrated a substantial and highly significant decrease in EF in the untreated MI group compared to sham-operated control animals (40 ± 5% versus 81 ± 1%, p < 0.001, figure 2 a ).

The McNemar’s test showed this change to be highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 2 ].

All the main effects were highly significant—Target ILD: F (4,160) = 587.6, p < .001; Precursor Condition: F (3,160) = 205.3, p < .001; Side: F (1,160) = 313.4, p < .001—as well as the interaction Target ILD vs.

The correlations of reproductive traits of winter wheat in different environments were compared in the figure, from which it can be seen that most of the winter wheat reproductive traits reached the highly significant level (p<0.001).The correlations of S1 stage traits in E1 environment were -0.02-0.67, and the correlations of S2 stage traits in E1 environment were 0.22-0.55; and the correlations of S1 stage traits in E2 environment were 0.37-0.55; and the correlations of S2 stage traits in E3 and E4 environments were 0.37-0.55. correlation was 0.37-0.63 for S1 stage trait in E2 environment and 0.45-0.62 for S2 stage trait in E2 environment; correlation of S1 stage trait in E3 environment was 0.41-0.62 and correlation of S2 stage trait in E4 environment was 0.36-0.62.

This association was statistically highly significant (P value <0.001).

A statistically highly significant difference (p≤0.001) compared to 0 h p.i. was first detected after 8 h in S2 cells and after 24 h in Sf9 cells.

We verified this by testing the overlap between the TF motif-gene cis -regulations inferred by MLC as applied to the LiCAT-seq human embryonic development dataset, 38 and the cis -regulations inferred by MethCorTarget applied to the DNAme human embryonic development dataset 39 : we found a highly significant overlap, odds ratio OR = 13.3 ( 12.9 − 13.8 ) ( p < 0.001 , Fisher’s exact test).

There was a decreasing trend of percentage Emiratis with PA, which was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Management method significantly affected BD and SP ( p < 0.05) but not MC, while management duration exerted highly significant effects on all three parameters ( p < 0.001) ( Figure S1 and Table S1 ).

32 The prognostic index was highly significant in the VG ( P < .001) and with a regression coefficient of 1.04 very close to the optimal value of 1, indicating no obvious bias or overfitting.

Comparison of Patients with AP and COVID-19 Disease Discharged Alive and Those Who Died Comparing patients with AP alive ( n = 16) with those who died ( n = 12) in the during-COVID-19 group, it was observed that all patients who died had the severe form (12/12, 100%) compared to the group of patients alive in which we encountered only patients with pancreatitis with a predominance of mild (3/16, 18.8%) and moderately severe (13/16, 81.2%) forms, with a statistically highly significant difference p < 0.001, with an OR of 14.73 (95% CI, 4.99–43.50; p = 0.004).

However, there was a highly significant difference in the total scores according to the presence or absence of AOS (p < 0.001), and while the inter-rater reliability for some individual items was low, the inter-rater reliability for the total score was high at an excellent range.

This difference was highly significant, t(4201) = −32.82, p < 0.001, d = −0.51, confirming Hypothesis A.

When long-term mortality was assessed at total follow-up of maximum 16 years in the same multivariate Cox regression model, the prognostic impact of IE somehow attenuated, but remained highly significant (HR 1.73, [1.29–2.32], p < 0.001).

For E P and E , one-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences ( F = 40.59 and F = 19.13, respectively; both p < 0.001).

The data displayed in Figure 5 are validated through the t-test and the difference is found to be highly significant with P-value P <0.001 and T-value T =25.3569.

18 showed a highly significant difference in ldPHI and zldPhi scores between our sorted VTE and non-VTE trials (Mann–Whitney Rank sum test, p < 0.001).

Studies comparing the highest versus lowest quartiles of UPFs intake ( n = 3) ( 16 , 17 , 23 ) yielded a highly significant and consistent result (ES = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.14–1.32, p < 0.001).

The difference in the correlation coefficients was highly significant ( p < 0.001): the statistical significance was confirmed and validated with Fisher’s z transformation test ( p < 0.001). 4.