“highly significant”

Durations of chest tube drainage in study group was less than of control group which was highly significant (p value = 0.001).

Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) with a medium effect size (from 0.51 to 0.73) were observed for the following parameters: sTfR, CHr, LowCHr, MCVr, MCH, MCV, CH, LowCHm, and MICROm.

Also, a highly significant association was observed between SPF and ploidy (p<0.001), as 23% of the tumors with SPF, less than 7.5% were aneuploid, compared to 74% of the tumors with higher proliferation rates [ 30 ].

Spearman’s rank correlation analysis yielded a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) between all three cognitive scoring systems (MMSE, MoCA, and CCS).

For the observers’ freezing, a 6 epoch (baseline, shock 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) × 2 preexposure (preexposed versus nonpreexposed) ANOVA on observer freezing revealed highly significant main effects for epoch (F [3.406,54.497] = 21.682, p < 0.001), preexposure (F [1,16] = 35.97, p < 0.001), and epoch × preexposure interaction (F [3.406,54.497] = 5.804, p = 0.001).

Analyzing the data looking for the prevalence among these patients, the correlation test revealed a highly significant correlation between gingival bleeding index and age, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.361 ( p <0.001).

In vitro Killing Kinetics of MDR-EAEC With Indolicidin In groups I, II, and V, the antimicrobial effect of Indolicidin was highly significant ( P < 0.001) at 120 min of co-incubation ( Figure 1 ).

Hence, adopting the total oocyte number from PVO4b to VTO as our proxy for potential fecundity, the relationship with body size (TL) was positive and highly significant (GLM, P < 0.001; Fig. 5A ), while no differences among spawning seasons was observed (GLM, P = 0.76).

The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) resulted in highly significant effects ( p = 0.001) of the clusters on the molecular variance observed in the GBS SNP dataset ( Table 2 ).

Lead and Cd were highly significant (p = 0.001), followed by Fe.

The results indicated highly significant improvements in all 14 physical and cortical functional assessments by the end of the PAC program ( P < 0.001).

Many authors define the cutoff value of the normal ONSD as (5 mm) which supports our cutoff point gained from the control group to compare it with the corresponding values of the patients.[ 9 13 ] The current study found a highly significant statistical correlation between ONSD with direct measurement of ICP ( R = 0.933 and P < 0.001), this result goes with the latest studies done in Rome, Italy, that was performed in 2017 by Toscano et al. whose found a strong correlation between ONSD and ICP ( R = 0.895 and P < 0.001).[ 14 ] Another

The chemical-genetic interaction of the positive control methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), a well-characterized antifungal agent that damages DNA [ 28 ], demonstrated a highly significant enrichment ( P value ≤ 0.001) for cellular response to DNA damage stimulus, confirming a successful HIP-HOP assay procedure and accurate post-sequencing data analysis.

Conversely, the iodine and acid values were significant (p < 0.05) but saponification and ester values were higher and highly significant (p < 0.001) in native.

Results On comparing sialic acid levels among the three groups, stage 2 showed the highest mean (8.61) compared with the other two groups and was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Statistically significant results were denoted by a value of P < 0.05, while the results were considered highly significant when value of P < 0.001 was obtained.

The analysis also showed that these effects were interdependent: the interaction between the two factors was highly significant ( P < 0.001), and blocking UV decreased attack rates in sp items (with more eyespots) but increased attack rates in wt items (with fewer eyespots) ( Fig. 3 ).

For chronic NOEC REACH data (European Commission 2006), the relationship with the chronic high‐quality nonextrapolated SSD midpoint data was less strong than for the EC50 data but still highly significant (A; overlapping number of compounds 251, y = 0.7448 x + 0.8502, R 2 = 0.60, p < 0.001).

Results from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) in the US and Canada for Type 1 DM and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) for Type 2 DM demonstrate highly significant reductions (DCCT, p<0.001; UKPDS, p = 0.009) in the incidence and progression of retinopathy in patients randomized to tight blood glucose control (HbA1c <7%).

In this study, the increase in Aβ42 levels in plasma samples from subjects with AD was highly significant ( P < 0.001), consistent with other IMR findings.

This result, that G-specific TAD borders were frequently positioned at G-specific compartment borders, was highly significant ( P < 0.001, two-sided Mann–Whitney U test; Fig. 5c ).

The balanced ANOSIM test inspecting whether changes in fg-LOFAs/diatom cell were driven by variations in diatom community composition highlighted highly significant differences (Global- R = 0.75, p < 0.001).

The hPEDF increase was highly significant in the 10,000 PEDF-SB group (p < 0.001) versus all injected eyes in tRPE cell and tIPE cell groups compared with saline ( Figures 2 H and 2I).

Specifically, we could demonstrate an inverse association with renal function as displayed by a highly significant correlations with the glomerular filtration rate of cystatin C (r = − 0.675, p < 0.001), cystatin C (r = 0.675, p < 0.001), creatinine (r = 0.629, p < 0.001) and urea (r = 0.623, p < 0.001) serum concentrations (Table 3 ), indicating renal clearance of MR-proANP [ 45 ].

PERMANOVA with 10000 permutations reveals highly significant (p < 0.001) differences between the two species.