“highly significant”

There was a highly significant association between expertise and gender [ χ ( 2 ) 2 = 19.01, p < 0.001, Cramer's V = 0.154].

The PLSCA results for the lower cervix (C5-T1) ( Fig 2a and 2c ) revealed the measured inertia (47.65; odds = 25:1000) in the healthy subjects to be much greater than the corresponding value in the MS patients (16.21; odds = 767:1000), with the difference between the odds being highly significant (p<0.001; effect size = 1.072).

The differences in the final bending angles between all porous films and the pore-free samples, between the 5 and 28%, and the 5 and 67% porous films were statistically highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001, one-way ANOVA, Tukey test).

Statistical analyses revealed differences in hole numbers between single mutants and wild types to be highly significant ( P ≤0.001); thus, each gene is individually required for neuronal maintenance.

Interaction between breed and month of age had highly significant (p<0.001) effect on the mRNA expression.

Specifically, genes such as PNPLA4, DGAT2, MGLL, LIPE, ATP8B1, CETP, PNPLA3, LIPG, LIPA, CPT1A, APOE, CD36, CPT2, ACOX1, MOGAT2, PLIN4, LPL, PNPLA2, and DGAT1 exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.001), while LYPLA1, SLC27A1, MPP1, PPT1, HADHB, GPAT3, MTTP, LPCAT1, and ZDHHC5 showed moderate differences ( p < 0.05) (Fig. 3 E).

The limit of statistical significance was p ≤ 0.05 whereas a p value of < 0.05 was considered to be significant (*), a p value of < 0.01 highly significant (**) and a p value of < 0.001 extremely significant (***).

Statistical analysis All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with statistical significance assigned at * P < 0.05 (significant), ** P < 0.01 (highly significant), and *** P < 0.001 (most significant).

A second study [ 144 ] followed 20 subjects with IBDs wearing the LNG-IUS; they observed a progressive reduction in the median PBAC score over time, becoming highly significant at 12 months ( p < 0.001).

All clinical stability tests—Anterior Drawer, Lachman and Pivot Shift—showed a highly significant reduction in anterior laxity post‐operatively ( p < 0.001), indicating successful restoration of the joint's mechanical integrity [ 29 ].

The most highly significant ( p < 0.001) impact from the group × genotype interaction was on IHTP, followed by the group × year × genotype impact.

KMO analysis yielded an index of 0.92, and in combination with a highly significant BTS, χ 2 (df = 66) = 2969.82, p < 0.001, confirmed that the data distribution satisfied the psychometric criteria [ 42 , 43 ].

The sex-differential effect is highly significant ( P = 0.001).

Group II exhibited a marked and highly significant decrease in immobility duration (*** p < 0.001), suggesting potent antidepressant‐like activity.

The results indicate that significant differences were found across all four variables (p < 0.01), with the following specific findings: Interior spatial design satisfaction: The differences among groups were highly significant (F = 437.234, p < 0.001).

Across all candidate models spring temperature was a highly significant predictor (p < 0.001).

Non-KPC strains (NDM/VIM/OXA-48; n = 48) showed lower resistance (<50%) to several agents and minimal resistance to tigecycline and CAZ-AVI (0–1.0%); resistance differences between KPC and non-KPC groups were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant difference between the two groups ( p < 0.001) was found regarding the presence of bone debris in the post-operative radiographs.

Specifically, TNFSF4, TNFSF14, and IDO2 exhibited moderate significance (p < 0.01), while most others, including CD86, PDCD1, CTLA4, and TIGIT, showed highly significant differences (p < 0.001) ( Figure 8A ).

Contrarily, it seems that fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus and subscapularis is a highly significant factor (p<0.001). 55 Another point is the bone quality.

We observed only a low, but highly significant, positive correlation of transcript and protein abundance for all three genotypes (R ≥ 0.2, p ≤ 0.001) (Fig. 3a , b ).

Unadjusted analysis Unadjusted analysis of the relationship of the risk group (coagulopathy, anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy) and the non-risk group with the variables patient- and surgery-specific characteristics showed that there were highly significant differences between the risk group and the non-risk group with regard to all variables (in each case p < 0.001) (Table 1 ).

All tests are two-sided; statistical significance was set at α = 0.05 (we denote p < 0.001 as highly significant).

The association of MA with CP was highly significant (P<0.001) with 21 (out of 25) patients having MA [20 had pure MA and 1 had mixed MA and iron deficiency anemia (IDA)] as compared to only 12 patients with MA (5 had pure MA and 7 had mixed MA and IDA) among 173 patients without pigmentation ( Table 3 ).

Furthermore, the influence of inversion was highly significant as a main effect, F (1, 47) = 168.36, p < .001, η p 2 = .78, indicating faster access to consciousness for upright than for inverted faces.