“highly significant”

Results: There was a highly significant difference (p≤0.001) in the mean shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to untreated teeth as compared to teeth treated with bleaching dentifrice.

high in trait impulsivity, based on median score on BIS-11) × 4 (four time points during cue exposure) repeated-measures ANOVA showed again a marginally significant main effect of drinking status ( F [1, 38] = 4.02, p = 0.052) and a highly significant main effect of cue exposure ( F [1.72, 65.18] = 16.33, p < 0.001) on craving.

Results were statistically significant at P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 and highly significant at P < 0.001.

This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001) demonstrating the importance of CD8 + effector T cells in MVA-BN ® -HER2-mediated anti-tumor efficacy.

The Fisher’s exact test indicated a highly significant relationship between maternal and neonatal parasitemia (p < 0.001).

There was a highly significant effect for the threshold parameter ( p < 0.001; in fact, none of the simulated values was larger than the observed value, making p effectively 0, see Figure 2 ), meaning that assuming the same threshold for the different conditions was an inadequate model of the observed data.

The modified quadratic model was a highly significant ( p < 0.001) representation of the actual relationships between the responses and significant variables.

This severe genotoxic effect was evidenced by highly significant increases ( p < 0.001) in key comet assay parameters: tail length, %DNA in the tail, and tail moment, when compared to untreated control cells, as shown in Table 2 and illustrated in Fig. 3 .

A highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) temperature increase after RegentK can be seen on all measurement spots of the injured knee in Figure 3 .

This analysis shows that BMI, WBC, HDL, TG, vitamin D, and TC are key predictors of the age at onset of T2D, as they have highly significant p-values (p < 0.001).

In particular, the omission of methyl salicylate and linalool resulted in a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001), emphasizing the crucial role of these aroma-active compounds in shaping the overall aroma profile of fermented chili pepper.

INR values in both groups revealed highly significant increases at the postoperative 1 st hour and postoperative 24 th hour compared to preoperative values ( P <0.001) [ Table 1 ].

One-way ANOVA test revealed a highly significant ( p ≤0.001) antibody raise among the immunized groups compared to that of non-vaccinated (placebo) negative control (NC).

There was a highly significant and negative effect of the ring width logarithm on Ca ( p < 0.001, ***, Fig. 4 d) and wider rings had lower Ca concentrations.

96.67%) proved to be highly significant (χ 2 =30.06; df =1; P <0.001).

A highly significant difference was found between the CHX and the NS group ( P = 0.001) and between the HEX group and NS group ( P = 0.001) regarding the isolation of oropharyngeal Gram-negative microorganisms ( Table 4 ).

As expected, the effect of ratio was highly significant: the higher the ratio, the more likely the risky choice was selected ( p < 0.001).

For instance, a highly significant association between the plasma and CSF concentrations of QA in IFNα-treated hepatitis C patients was reported by Raison, Miller and colleagues ( r =0.72, P <0.001). 33 Further, Brundin, Erhardt and colleagues have reported persistent reductions in KynA and increases in QA in the CSF of suicide atte

The fixed effect model analysis concedes a highly significant standardized mean difference for the engraftment of knockout HSPCs in the spleen compared to non-edited ones (95% CI, –1.00 to –0.327; P < 0.001) ( Fig. 3b ).

Statistical analysis The ANOVA of experimental data showed that all the simple and the double effects of the main factors studied (time, temperature and ultrasound application) resulted highly significant (p < 0.001).

Although the LS174T cell positivity for mHsp70 was highly significant between the wt and LDH -/- sublines (p ≤ 0.001), there was no remarkable difference in their MFI referring to the mHsp70 density per cell ( Figure 1B ).

RFV had highly significant negative correlations with ADF, CPY, and NDF ( r = –0.72, –0.66, and –0.89; p <0.001), and CPY had highly significant positive correlations with NDF ( r = 0.68).

The Vuong test of a zero-inflated Poisson versus a standard Poisson, run in Stata was also highly significant (p < 0.001) indicating that the zero-inflated model was better.

The effect of F1 cross on diapause response was highly significant for both the larval and pupal decisions (cross; larval decision: χ 2 (2) = 36.24, p < 0.001, pupal decision: χ 2 (2) = 40.01, p < 0.001) and cross uniquely explained approximately 20% of the total variation in diapause decisions (larval decision: semi-partial R 2 = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.03−0.39; pupal decision: semi-partial R 2 = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.07−0.38).

All groups succeeded in restoring sufficient vitamin D status except the deficient SCD group with a median level of 25.5 (20.5–34) at 6-month post-intervention; however, there was a highly significant improvement from baseline levels ( P < 0.001).