“highly significant”

Results Initial metabolite concentrations At day 0, there were highly significant differences in the concentrations of metabolites present (F 4,1074 = 262.87, P < 0.001) for all life cycle stages (F 2,1074 = 791.7, P < 0.001) with a significant interaction between metabolite and life cycle stage (F 8,1074 = 227.9, P < 0.001; Fig. 1 ).

Pulp vitality was the variable that was most likely associated with EPLs and showed a very high odds ratio of 260.15, which was highly significant (p=0.001).

The correlation between IGF-1 levels and neoplastic growth stimulation was highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating that MØCM IGF-1 levels were directly related to the ability of MØCM to stimulate neoplastic proliferation.

ANOVA showed highly significant effects ( P < 0.001) of genotypes, environments, and genotype × environment interactions for GY in the seven EYTs ( Supplementary Table 2 ).

All these correlations were highly significant (p<0.001).

In Table 1 , there is no statistically significant difference for mean RR, RMSSD, SDNN, NN50%, and pNN50% from RR interval series obtained by the two devices; moreover, highly significant ( P < 0.001) strong correlation ( r = 0.99) between the device in the both positions was observed.

Statistical tests were made by the Primer program, version 1 (Primer of Biostatistics): differences from basal or control values (as shown in the plots) were classed as significant (*) where P < .05, (**) where P < .01 and highly significant (***) where P < .001 by Student's t test. 3.

After exposure to CuCl, a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.001) in fluorescence beginning from a concentration of 0.5 μM (49.5 μg L -1 ) was found in both M. galloprovincialis and R. philippinarum ( Figure 2A ).

Results were substantively similar: age 20-24 remained highly significant with a large effect size (OR=66.54, p<0.001), as did career prioritization (OR=3.49, p=0.003).

Notably, the aqueous extract (RTA) exhibited the most significant cytotoxic effect against DU145 prostate cancer cell lines, achieving a highly significant increase in cytotoxicity at 24 h ( p < 0.001), which was sustained at 48 h and 72 h ( p < 0.05).

However, Spearman rank correlation between the two sets of test results was highly significant ( p < 0.001; r = 0.7; 95% CL 0.6–0.9) (Figure 4 ).

* p < 0.05 (considered significant compared with control group); ** p < 0.01 (considered highly significant); *** p < 0.001 (considered extremely significant).

Sperm Morphology The Time×Group interaction was likewise highly significant (F[2,107]=29.254, P<0.001).

Broad sense heritability estimated was 0.53, with highly significant genotypic variance ( P value ≤ 0.001).

The enrichment analysis revealed that bZIP transcription factors were the most significantly overrepresented family predicted to bind histone gene promoters, with multiple members (e.g., Seita.1G043800) showing highly significant p -values ( p < 0.001) (Supplementary Table S7).

The four‐way anova run on the data from all 12 areas revealed a main effect of ModSpecificity ( F 2,11 = 2345, P < 0.001), with generally more CA cells and therefore higher assembly‐cell density in the multimodal than in the secondary mesomodal ( t 12 = 48.9, P < 0.001), and in the secondary than in the primary unimodal ( t 12 = 14.6, P < 0.001) areas; in addition, a highly significant interaction of the factors ExtraPeri, ModSpecificity, FrontoTemp and WordType ( F 2,11 = 137.6, P < 0.001) emerged, confirming that CA topographies (i.e. the distributions of their neurons over the areas) differed between word types.

Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 (*) or highly significant at p < 0.001 (**).

Two-way ANOVA (Solvent × Time) revealed a highly significant main effect of solvent (F(1,20) = 1526.28, p < 0.001; partial η 2 = 0.987), indicating that solvent selection accounts for nearly all explainable variance in TPC within vortex-assisted systems.

These differences in reported pleasantness were highly significant ( p < 0.001, bootstrap).

The increase was more evident in the 100 mg/kg ICA group compared with the 25 mg/kg ICA group, with a highly significant difference (*** p < 0.001).

Specifically, a highly significant difference in MEI between the main and lateral shoot groups was observed in both the early (p < 0.001) and late (p < 0.001) periods, but not in the middle period (p = 0.320).

A highly significant range-variance congruency, F (1, 29) = 37.9, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.12, suggests that participants were more accurate when range and variance conveyed consistent information ( M = 75%, SD = 6.3%), compared to the incongruent condition ( M = 67%, SD = 5.5%).

A highly significant RAE was present in both former [χ 2 (3, 764) = 60.36; p < 0.001; ω = 0.31] and current youth ski racers [χ 2 (3, 702) = 43.13; p < 0.001; ω = 0.29] with an over-representation of athletes of Q1 (30.3–34.2%) and a clear under-representation of athletes of Q4 (14.8–15.0%).

However, in a similar manner a highly significant (Friedman: p<0.001; adj. p (3d post exchange-exchange day <0.001) increase in fibrinogen concentration was observed [median day of exchange: 162g/L (IQR 106/222); median 3d post exchange: 273g/L (IQR 210/389)], following a non-significant (Friedman: p=0.079) decrease ( Figure 5E ) prior to the system exchange.

In regard to race distance, the regression model explained a highly significant proportion ( p < 0.001) of variance in the 2018EC ranking for 50 m (47%), 100 m (45%), and 200 m races (31%).