However, the analysis did identify two specific conditions where the effect of time was statistically significant, demonstrating a reliable change in CFU over the measured period: Listerine 50% on Polyamide (PA) showed a highly significant effect of Time (F = 35.590, p < 0.001), confirming a strong and reliable time-dependent bactericidal action, and the change over time for peppermint oil on PMMA (acrylic) was also found to be statistically significant (F = 3.744, p = 0.047).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The paired samples Student’s t-test indicates a highly significant mean difference of −11.9 ( p < 0.001, 95% CI: −14.9 to −8.92).
Additionally, Vicinamibacteraceae exhibited a highly significant positive association with RB4 1 (r = 0.798, p < 0.001), implying shared ecological strategies that may stabilize soil microbial communities under similar environmental conditions.
All models demonstrate a p -value of 0.000, indicating that the color variables are highly significant predictors of maturity ( p < 0.001).
Pearson Correlation Analysis As illustrated in Figure 8 , storage temperature showed a highly significant negative correlation with the a* value (redness) of the 3D-printed pork products ( p < 0.001), while it exhibited highly significant positive correlations with TVB-N, peroxide value (PV), and the concentrations of Maillard reaction products (A 294 and A 420 ) ( p < 0.001).
Exogenous melatonin treatment (MS) further dramatically increased the MT level to 505.0 μg·g -1 , which was 78.9% and 63.1% higher than that of the CK and S groups, respectively, and the differences between the groups all reached highly significant levels ( P <0.001).
Highly significant ( p < 0.001) but weak positive correlations were found among all biomarkers of inflammation, using Spearman’s correlation coefficient ( r s ): total leukocyte count and NLR ( r s = 0.263), total leukocyte count and CRP ( r s = 0.262), and NLR and CRP ( r s = 0.062).
The high-dose treatments of ADSP (ADSP-HD) and AFP (AFP-HD) led to more pronounced reductions, with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).
Correlation analysis The crude correlation among the two dietary instruments was highly significant for total fluid consumption in mL/d ( r = 0.73; p < 0.001).
Changes within each supplement group were analyzed by paired t -test using http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/Service/Statistics/Student_t_Test.html Group comparisons were done by unpaired t -test using http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/Service/Statistics/2Sample_Student_t_Test.html Results After 10 days of supplementation, both supplements produced highly significant increases in plasma lutein values (Fig. 1 , p < 0.001 for each treatment, paired t -test).
The overall ANOVA was highly significant (F(4) = 16.54, p < .001), indicating that the D1 was able to discriminate between therapeutic security profiles of mentally disordered offenders.
45.67 ± 8.79, 47.41 ± 10.15 and 50.86 ± 9.32 respectively) with highly significant different results ( p < 0.001).
Whereas in the 250 mg/kg body weight of benzene extract treated animals showed a highly significant decrease (p≤0.001) in total sperm count (56%), total number of motile sperm (45%), forward velocity of sperm (49%) and a highly significant increase (p≤0.001) in the percentage of abnormal sperm (544%) when compared to control animals ( Table I ).
All comparisons with artificially balanced Test-2 remained highly significant ( P <.001), reflecting its intentional difference in class ratio.
Median confidence increased from not at all confident to somewhat confident, a highly significant improvement (Wilcoxon z = 5.11, p < 0.001, r = 0.84).
However, after sleep, there was a strong and highly significant change in the time to peak of the PETH (i.e., “temporal coupling shift,” Fig 3B , Kolmogorov-Smirnoff p < 0.001) and a smaller but significant change in task-related modulation ( Fig 3C , p < 0.05, paired t test comparing modulation for Reach 2early to both Reach 1 blocks).
Results and discussion Variance estimates and G × E interaction Both the combined ANOVA (Table 3 ) and the AMMI model analysis (Table 4 ) revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) among genotypes, environments, and GEI for the majority of yield and related traits evaluated across six test environments.
For BILAR, lower values were strongly associated with mortality, with BILAR < 5 showing a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 1 ).
The correlation coefficients ranged from moderate to very high (with r ranging from 0.6 to 0.9), all highly significant ( p < 0.001).
All intermediate timepoints (3, 6, and 12 months) also showed highly significant improvements compared to baseline (all p < 0.001) with stable distributions compared to 1 month (all p > 0.05) (Fig. 2 ).
Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference between the two methods (paired t-test, p < 0.001), with the Model 1 outperforming the doctor by an average of 0.20 to 0.22 (95% CI: 0.193–0.221).
EC showed highly significant concentration-dependent increases ( P < 0.001).
Pre-harvest sprouting tolerance (PHST) based on SS and FN exhibited highly significant ( p < 0.001) phenotypic differences.
When the data from all three dairies were combined, there was an overall highly significant difference between the traps ( × 2 = 76.52, df = 2, p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).
However, there was a highly significant effect of the region from which subjects originated (REGION x INFECTION, χ 2 2 = 16.1, p <0.001).