“highly significant”

Polymorphism ( % ) = number of polymorphic bands total number of bands * 100 Results Analysis of variance of quantitative traits of amaranth genotypes The results from the combined analysis of variance across the two experimental locations revealed that genotype showed highly significant (P < 0.001) differences for majority of the traits except for unmarketable leaves (UML) and chlorophyll content (CC).

Statistical significance was determined at the * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 level, while very highly significant was determined at the *** p < 0.001 level. 3.

Factor Structure of the PBQ The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy was found to be 0.84, and Bartlett’s test for sphericity was highly significant (χ2 = 2693.288, df = 300, p < 0.001).

The mean cortisol responses were modest but highly significant, with a significant rise in cortisol between baseline and post-task values ( p < 0.001).

The overall log-rank test was highly significant ( p <0.001), and pairwise comparisons also demonstrated substantial differences between the low- and moderate-risk groups ( p = 0.006) and between the moderate- and high-risk groups ( p = 0.016).

When controlled for body size, the difference in the pronotum length became highly significant ( F 1,240 = 17.75, p < 0.001). 3.2 .

We found highly significant differences in ethnoracial distribution according to county designation (Figure 1; p < 0.001; Fisher’s exact) and in both state and national Area Deprivation Index scores (ADI; Figure 2; p <0.0001, one‐way ANOVA).

Further, not knowing where to get tested, which was a significant barrier across the entire participant group, was highly significant among women ( p ≤ 0.001, N = 91) but not in men (P = 0.314; N = 28).

Although highly significant, the positive correlation between OD and fumarate (Spearman rank correlation, P < 0.001 and ρ = 0.18) and glycerol ( P < 0.001 and ρ = 0.22) concentrations, respectively, was very weak.

Statistical significance was defined as follows: * p < 0.05: Significant difference; ** p < 0.01: Highly significant difference; *** p < 0.001: Very highly significant difference; ns: No significant difference.

However, the association between life satisfaction and social confidants with mental health reporting remained to be highly significant in Step 3 (OR = 2.25, p < .001 for life satisfaction; OR = 1.53, p = .001 for social confidants), as in Step 2. 3.2.1.2.

Statistical analysis showed that there were highly significant differences of lesions between treatment levels ( P <0.001) and between the two cultivars ( P <0.001), and there was a cultivar by germanium treatment interaction ( P <0.001).

Plant height exhibited highly significant differences between cultivars and topping levels ( p ≤ 0.001).

The optimal anchor scaffold depended on the reporter genes, particularly the anchor orientation had a dominant and highly significant effect on the surface display activity (ANOVA, p < 0.001, Fig. 3 B).

There was a highly significant statistical difference in mean analgesic time among the three groups with a p-value < 0.001.

ANOVA revealed highly significant variation between diapause and non-diapause generations in both 1 st to 3 rd (F = 38.259, p < 0.001) and 4 th to 5 th (F = 15.99, p < 0.001) instar larval groups.

OSCC with lymph node metastasis showed only slight lymphoplasmocytic infiltration in a highly significant manner ( P < 0.001).

After entering both mediators (personal norm and perceived health risks) into the model, the intervention predicted perceived health risks significantly ( B = 0.20, p = 0.04, CI [0.014; 0.384]), which in turn predicted participants’ willingness to offer expired but still edible food highly significant ( B = −0.09, p < 0.001, CI [−0.119; −0.067]).

The regression between the selection coefficients of genes (mean of 32 replicates) in CFP strain and YFP strain was highly significant ( F 1,6 = 117, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.943, slope = 1.007), indicating different fluorescent backgrounds do not interact with this subset of genes, and all measured effects are solely due to the introduced genes.

The p value criteria used in the figures are as follows: * p < 0.05 presents a significant difference, ** p < 0.01 shows a highly significant difference, and *** p < 0.001 shows an extremely significant difference. 3.

In this case, log-transformed data were fitted to a linear regression model, resulting in an estimated decay rate of d = -0.0310 ±0.0037 h -1 ( R 2 = 0.549, F 1,57 = 69.510, P < 0.001). Interestingly, the loss of infectivity in cell-free media was 3.35-fold faster compared to that in a media containing cell lysates, being the difference between both conditions highly significant ( t 78 = 32.925, P < 0.001).

To quantitatively test whether these spatial‐ and load‐induced variations in ECM nanostructure are significant, generalized additive models (GAMs) were also used to model the variation, and the results showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences with both anatomical location and loading state (Table S2 , Supporting Information).

The reduction in the CFUs recovered from lungs of the aP- aP-, aP- OMV P-, and aP-wP–immunized mice ranged from 2.9 to 3.6 orders of magnitude (non-significant differences between those treatments) in comparison to the highly significant difference relative to non-immunized animals ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant disparity was observed for plasma cell levels across groups ( p < 0.001).

The median OS for ALBI grade I patients was 21 (95% CI: 11–54) months, and for ALBI grade II and III patients, it was 5 (95% CI: 4–9) months, with a highly significant difference among groups ( p < 0.001) ( Fig. 2 ).