Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp -value = 1 × 10−160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As reported in the Results section, the resulting network showed a highly significant protein–protein interaction enrichment ( p -value = 1 × 10−16), indicating that the observed interactions are far more frequent than expected for a random set of proteins of comparable size.
highly significantP -value < 10 -160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The C > A mutations observed were associated with highly significant sequence-selectivity, being marked by an excess at CpCpT (NGCII082, odds ratio (OR) = 3.2, P -value < 10 -16 , χ 2 test) or TpCpA sites (NGCII092, OR = 1.7, P -value < 10 -16 , χ 2 test) and extensions of these motifs (Materials and methods; Note 6 and Figure S6 in Additional file 1 and Table S14 in Additional file 6 ).
highly significantp-value of <1.0e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The PPI network exhibited a highly significant enrichment, with a p-value of <1.0e-16 and obtained from a random set of proteins which is a distinguishable property of STRING analysis, suggesting that these proteins are more interconnected than expected by chance, pointing to their potential roles in Parkinson’s disease pathology ( Figures 3 , 4 ).
highly significantP <1 × 10 16the decimal point is missing; read as 1e-16qualifiedgold
41 All clocks demonstrated a strong and highly significant correlation with the biologic age, with the skin and blood clock demonstrating the strongest correlation (Pearson R = .96; 95% CI, 0.959–0.97; P <1 × 10 16 ) ( Figure 8 A ).
highly significantp -value of <1.0 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, the effects were clearly non-random, with highly significant enrichments of specific pathways and an overall protein–protein-interaction enrichment p -value of <1.0 × 10 −16 upon bioinformatics analysis at the STRING (search tool for the retrieval of interacting genes) webpage in Heidelberg.
highly significantp values < 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
ChIP-seq showed there was a highly significant correlation ( p values < 10 −16 ) between ER binding fold changes induced by the addition of elacestrant or fulvestrant in the three cell lines tested (Pearson correlations with p values <10 −16 ; 0.78 MCF7, 0.47 MCF7-LTED wt and 0.60 MCF7-LTED Y537C ) especially in regions where there was increased ER binding after treatment versus E2 (Fig. 4A ).