Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Immunohistochemical techniques were used to examine the accumulation of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-17 in forty ( n = 40) formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded oesophageal archived specimens across a range of endoscopic diagnostic categories, and a highly significant difference was found, where P ≤ 0.001, in IL-17 expression (Kruskall Wallis and Mann-Whitney U ) between all the cell types examined.
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In line this view, a repeated-measures ANOVA on reaction time during noTMS trials with task (detection, angle judgment), TMS type (sham, real), and context (interleaved, blocked) as within subject factors revealed a highly significant effect of context ( F (1,13) = 59.940, p < .001) and an effect of task ( F (1,13) = 379.706, p < .001) due to differences in task difficulty.
highly significantP < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
marginal significanceP = .0641.3× alphagold
However, a highly significant heterogeneity was identified in sleep duration ( Q value = 259.382, P < .001), suggesting that there may be a large variation in its instrumental variables.The horizontal pleiotropic test showed marginal significance (intercept = 0.019, P = .064), suggesting that there may be a slight pleiotropic bias.
highly significantp ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, the mean Mg:Ca ratio at otolith edge varied significantly among months ( p ≤ 0.05), with significant differences between May and June ( p ≤ 0.05), and highly significant differences between May and September ( p ≤ 0.001), while June and July did not differ significantly ( p > 0.05).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the presence of AMPAR blocker NBQX, synaptic stimulation paired with a bAP (70 ms apart, Figures 3 A and 3B) led to a relatively small, but highly significant, supralinear summation of Ca 2+ entry both in the shafts ( ΔG/R ; 115% ± 3% of the sum, n = 10, p < 0.001; Figures 3 C and 3E) and in the spines ( ΔG/R ; 115% ± 5% of the sum, n = 19, p = 0.001; Figures 3 D and 3F; cells were held in current-clamp mode).