“highly significant”

Specifically, probiotics supplementation led to highly significant reductions in body weight (73.74 ± 13.49 to 72.68 ± 13.45 kg, p < 0.001) and BMI (27.27 ± 3.44 to 26.88 ± 3.54 kg/m 2 , p < 0.001).

Biometric Relationships All biometric relationships between TW, CW and CL were highly significant for the pooled dataset and for each sex ( p < 0.001), with strong coefficients of determination (r 2 = 0.81–0.95; Figure 5 ).

Tumor Subsite Tumor anatomic distribution showed a highly significant difference between NSND and SD patients ( p < 0.001).

As can be seen in Table 1 across all sensor response-data, ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of concentration on signal response ( p < 0.001 in all cases).

These decreases however were more significant ( P <0.001) in plasma, and very highly significant ( P <0.001) in whole blood and placental tissue of RM patients when compared to both HP and NP women.

Tiger-widows showed significantly higher stigma scores on all the clusters (fear, negative feelings, disclosure, discrimination, community attitudes, and spiritual dimension) as well as total scores (65.9 ± 9.8) than from both normal (35.8 ± 8.0) and snake-bite widows (40.1 ± 7.1) and this difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

But in the healthy group, the IAR was only 1.04 ± 0.04, which was a highly significant difference between groups (p < 0.001) [ 20 ].

40 healthy controls), TBARS levels were substantially higher in the leukoplakia group, with a highly significant difference between groups ( p < 0.001).

While comparing the mean values of SaO 2 and SpO 2 were 84.41 ± 4.24 and 80.58 ± 5.77, respectively, and this difference was statistically very highly significant (p< 0.001, Table 3 ).

With the increasing age there is decrease in apical, middle, coronal and total pulp area of both left and right maxillary central incisors in both males and females among the different 12 age groups which was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Correlation between dental and skeletal maturity Highly significant correlation between dental and skeletal maturity ( P < 0.001) was found among both males and females.

These differences were highly significant (2 × 2 contingency χ 2 = 663.2; 1 df; P < 0.001).

Periventricular and deep scores were summed to a total score of 0–6 and showed a highly significant correlation with WMH volume (Spearman's ρ = 0.88, P < 0.001).

There were modest but highly significant correlations between the degree of SEC (scale, 0–4) and both the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score (Spearman r = 0.29, P < 0.001) and BNP (Spearman r = 0.32, P < 0.001).

Genetic diversity in the five European wildcat biogeographic groups The total genetic variability was significantly partitioned among the three cat subspecies ( ф ST = 0.159; F ST = 0.068; R ST = 0.392) and among the five European wildcats biogeographic groups ( ф ST = 0.103; F ST = 0.108; R ST = 0.143; AMOVA; all ф ST values highly significant with P < 0.001).

Most of the genetic variation was between species (65.5% of the total genetic variation) and 24.9% within species, and all values were highly significant ( P < 0.001; Table 2 ).

The factorability was adequate, as indicated by a KMO value of 0.960 and a highly significant Bartlett’s test of sphericity (χ 2 = 3171.088, df = 66, p < 0.001).

At interface 1 (LCI; restoration to luting composite), LS2 showed a highly significant continuous increase in gap formation (LGVC) from t0 to t2/t3 ( p < 0.001, effect size = 0.9, Figure 2 e, Supplement file S1 Tab.9 ).

Therefore, Welch ANOVA was applied, revealing a highly significant overall difference among the groups (Welch’s F(5,12.4) = 268.976, p < 0.001).

The difference between the two groups was highly significant (Mann-Whitney test, Z adj = 4.61, p < 0.001), thus showing that the silicon cover prevents olfactory detection and therefore learning.

Complete healing of the wounds receiving LLLT in combination with CoQ10 was highly significant on both days 13 and 15 compared with controls or wounds treated with LLLT or CoQ10 alone (p < 0.001), whereas no difference was found in the wounds treated with LLL alone, CoQ10 alone vs. sham treatment.

Significance levels were assessed as follows: * p < 0.05 (significant), ** p < 0.01 (highly significant), *** p < 0.001 (extremely significant), and **** p ≤ 0.0001 (extremely significant), or non-significant ( p > 0.05). 5.

12.8%) with a highly significant difference (P <.001).

Baseline PSQI scores were comparable between groups, but the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements thereafter, with mean PSQI decreasing to 8.60 ± 2.28 at week 1 and 5.20 ± 1.87 at week 2, compared with 11.08 ± 2.73 and 10.68 ± 2.88 in controls at the same time points, respectively, indicating a marked, time-dependent improvement in subjective sleep quality with between-group differences reported as highly significant ( p < 0.001) [ 134 ].

Pairwise comparison was done using the post hoc Mann–Whitney test and showed that there exists a statistically highly significant difference in the mean fold increase of P. gingivalis expression between OPMD group and control group ( P < 0.001) [ Table 3 and Graph 2 ].