Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation was weak in early Braak stages I–II ( ρ = 0.064; FDR- p = 0.628), whereas stronger and highly significant correlation was found in later Braak stages: III–IV ( ρ = − 0.424; FDR- p = 0.001), V–VI ( ρ = − 0.440; FDR- p = 0.0004), and all stages combined ( ρ = − 0.430; FDR- p = 0.001).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
stoebe and its neighbouring communities In the competition containers, biomass of EU neighbouring community explained a highly significant and substantial amount of the variation in biomass of C . stoebe (R 2 = 0.39, Δlog-likelihood = 4.91, P < 0.001; Fig 4a ), but NA neighbouring community did not explain variation in biomass of C . stoebe (R 2 = 0.05, Δlog-likelihood = -13.96, P = 0.48; Fig 4b ).
highly significantp <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the statistical analysis of the significance of this difference, considering the clustered nature of data of participants within centers and a between-cluster randomization design, the parameter estimating the effect of the group was not significant ( p = 0.27), while the hypothesis test regarding the significance of the “center” random effect was highly significant ( p <0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test between the distribution of the diagonal elements of the correlation matrix and the extra-diagonal elements ( Figure 4C ) resulted in a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001), indicating that the predicted task maps are significantly more correlated to their actual maps than to the maps of other subjects.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Sperm Motility in Sexed Porcine Semen The quantitative assessment of Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA) parameters demonstrates a highly significant discriminatory impact ( p < 0.001) of the sexing process on the kinematic integrity of porcine spermatozoa, revealing a clear disparity between X- and Y-enriched populations ( Table 4 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
8016.4 ± 1399.6 gm, respectively; p = 0.013, MD = 824.2, 95% CI = 325.1 to 1323.4), highly significant increase in length (72.8 ± 4.1 vs. 70.1 ± 3.6 cm, respectively; p < 0.001, MD = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.3 to 4.1), and significant increase in head circumference (44.5 ± 2.5 vs. 43.2 ± 2.7 cm, respectively; p = 0.006, MD = 1.3, 95% CI = 0.4 to 2.2).