“marginal significance”

In contrast, the standard CRRT filter group showed significant intragroup changes in lactate, platelets, pH, CRP (all p < 0.001), and PCT ( p = 0.022), with marginal significance for noradrenaline ( p = 0.052), while WBC remained nonsignificant ( p = 0.841) (online suppl.

Tukey HSD post hoc tests revealed that this difference was only significant for the comparison between LMI and HC with an estimated mean difference of 6.41 (SE = 2.29, t(66) = 2.801, p = 0.018), although the comparison between fSBA and HC did show marginal significance (Est = 4.16, SE = 1.75, t(66) = 2.379, p = 0.052).

Turtle doves infected by the GEO strain had wings 5.94 mm shorter on average (with marginal significance: P = 0.052; overall wing length range 159–180 mm) than those infected by the Tcl-1 strain ( Fig. 2 ) when controlling for an increase in moult score with day ( Table 1b ).

Participants’ inhibitory control ( β = 0.326, SE = 1.92, p = 0.061) and the peritraumatic heart rate during the sexual assault scene showed marginal significance ( β = 0.450, SE = 2.56, p = 0.052).

While the combined delayed recall (A + B) approached marginal significance ( p = .052) for the divorced/separated group, no other significant differences were observed.

Glx levels in patients with affective disorders exhibited significance in the FC (Hedge's g = −0.342, 95% CI −0.616 to −0.068, p = 0.014), whereas Glu levels showed marginal significance (Hedge's g = −0.172, 95% CI −0.345 to 0.002, p = 0.052).

Predictors of involvement in research based on statistically significant sociodemographic data Fifth-year students had significantly higher odds of research participation compared to second-year students (OR = 25.55, 95% CI: 5.57-117.21, p < 0.001), while age above 25 showed marginal significance (OR = 11.83, 95% CI: 0.97-143.75, p = 0.052) (Table 4 ).

36 showed that patients treated with intensive local therapy (defined as en bloc resection, curettage, or RT with BED > 85 Gy) demonstrated significantly better OS ( p = 0.006) for those with solitary bone metastasis, but only marginal significance ( p = 0.052) for those with multiple bone metastases, when compared to those treated with less intensive (RT with BED < 85 Gy) or no therapy.

Marginally significant metabolites identified in relative abundance analysis for GERD and thyroid dysfunction are in Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2 , respectively, showing that among metabolites with highest marginal significance, pro-pro trended higher with GERD (p = 0.052) while triethylamine trended lower with thyroid dysfunction (p = 0.052). 3.3.

With marginal significance, fidelity to the EBPP remained steady for the BASIS-T group over time but deteriorated for attention control ( p = 0.052), and the BASIS-T condition engaged in the EBPP more frequently ( p = 0.097).

The Observed index showed marginal significance ( P = 0.052), whereas the Simpson index was unchanged.

Simple effects analyses revealed significant group differences at F6 ( p = 0.026) and Pz ( p = 0.049) electrodes, with marginal significance at Cz ( p = 0.052) and C6 ( p = 0.078).

Regarding Final Pitch Span, the main effect of Length was dominant [ F (1, 701.70) = 34.70, p < 0.001], whereas the effect of Group reached only marginal significance ( p = 0.052).

Neonates with unilateral hemorrhages were more associated with cesarean section (25.0%) delivery than infants with bilateral hemorrhage (7.0%), with marginal significance ( p = 0.052).

The phase × outcome interaction showed marginal significance in the midline central area ( F (1, 34) = 4.047, p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.106).

Only fibrous intimal thickening showed marginal significance for prognosis after adjustment for serum creatinine (HR: 9.2; p = 0.052).

In the 80–89 age group, the hip fracture IR in 2020 was smaller by a marginal significance (PC, −5%; 95% CI, −8 to −2; P = 0.052).

However, the marginal significance of the corticosteroid dose in this study (HR = 1.521, P = 0.052) also suggests the need to be alert to the potential risk of excessive immunosuppression.

The age group showed marginal significance (p=0.052), whereas household size was not significantly linked to food security levels (p=0.849).

Notably, CC genotype of rs2302614 might, on the contrary, elevated the risk for completed suicide, but odds ratio (OR) could not be calculated since none CC carrier was detected among suicide attempters (Table 5 ) Furthermore, in ODC1 gene, examination of haplotype rs1049500-rs2302614 associations with suicidal behavior revealed marginal significance of AC haplotype in decreasing the risk for completed suicide compared to suicide attempt (OR = 0.50, F = 0.046, t = 3.79, P = 0.052, logistic regression analysis adjusted by sex) (Table 6 ) Discussion In this study, we report the results of the investigation of five variants from three candidate genes, GRIN2B , GABRG2 and ODC1 , on two types of suicidal behavior, attempted and completed suicide from two Balkan countries, Serbia and Slovenia.

Proportion of resectable patients were higher in no recurrence group (n = 41, 91.1%) than early recurrence (n = 50, 68.5%) and late recurrence (n = 35, 79.5%) group with marginal significance ( P = 0.052).

Statistical significance was observed in the dimensions and volume of the maxillary sinus when analyzed across various age groups ( Table 1 ), except for the AP dimension, which exhibited marginal significance ( p = 0.052).

The medication group displayed similar improvements, especially at 4 weeks across most parameters, except for marginal significance in OABSS scores at 2 weeks ( p = 0.052), indicating a delayed symptom reduction.

At lag 0, only weak associations were observed, with marginal significance in Kericho ( p = 0.052), Nakuru ( p = 0.062), and Trans Nzoia ( p = 0.053).

However, CADD scores of two candidate SNPs (rs10975820 [ KANK1 : R130C19.3 ] and rs4465021 [ KDM4C ]) not identified as lead SNPs, exceeded this threshold (Table 2 ). The Fisher’s exact tests of the lead SNPs comparing the proportions of heterozygous and homozygous alternate genotypes resulted in three of the four lead SNPs being significant ( p < 0.05) and one having a marginal significance ( p = 0.0525) (Table 3 and Online Resource 4 ).