“marginal significance”

In contrast, the standard CRRT filter group showed significant intragroup changes in lactate, platelets, pH, CRP (all p < 0.001), and PCT ( p = 0.022), with marginal significance for noradrenaline ( p = 0.052), while WBC remained nonsignificant ( p = 0.841) (online suppl.

Participants’ inhibitory control ( β = 0.326, SE = 1.92, p = 0.061) and the peritraumatic heart rate during the sexual assault scene showed marginal significance ( β = 0.450, SE = 2.56, p = 0.052).

However, CADD scores of two candidate SNPs (rs10975820 [ KANK1 : R130C19.3 ] and rs4465021 [ KDM4C ]) not identified as lead SNPs, exceeded this threshold (Table 2 ). The Fisher’s exact tests of the lead SNPs comparing the proportions of heterozygous and homozygous alternate genotypes resulted in three of the four lead SNPs being significant ( p < 0.05) and one having a marginal significance ( p = 0.0525) (Table 3 and Online Resource 4 ).

Difference in PPD reduction at 8w showed marginal significance (-1.74 ± 0.68 vs -1.46 ± 0.64, test vs control, P = 0.0526) (Table 2 ).

One variable showed marginal significance of association with NL: visits to diabetes clinic ( p = 0.053).

Non‐degrading stimuli were less often correctly rejected (averaged across both conditions) in the OWC (27.93 ± 2.79) compared to the NWC group (30.34 ± 2.73; t 47 = 3.029, p = 0.004, d = 0.874) and—with marginal significance—also compared to the BED group (29.47 ± 2.68; t 49 = 1.982, p = 0.053, d = 0.564), in a main effect of Group for correct rejection ( F 2, 76 = 4.713, p < 0.0167, ƞ p 2 = 0.110).

Notably, BNP (β = 0.796, p < 0.001), CPB (β = 0.512, p = 0.012), BMI (β = -0.421, p = 0.023), and MIS (β = -0.488, p = 0.042) remained statistically significant, while ICU days demonstrated marginal significance (p = 0.053).

PR‐negative status showed marginal significance (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.40–0.98 and p = 0.053), while complete clinical response remained strongly predictive (reference) versus SD (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.02–0.40 and p = 0.002).

GLS2 expression exhibited a trend toward higher levels in the Basal subtype, with marginal significance ( p =.053), suggesting a potential subtype-specific role that may warrant further investigation (Fig. 5 b and c).

Also, at the age of 60 months, we recorded an almost double percentage of obese female patients who had BMI Z-score values above 2 compared to male patients, the difference being in this case only a marginal significance (χ 2 = 3.748 with p = 0.053) ( Table 4 ). 3.3.

saccharinum with marginal significance (Dunn’s test p = 0.053).

In The Bachelor shows, the main effect of cultural region exhibited only marginal significance, F (3, 97) = 2.66, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.08.

Full model (BRI + BMI + WC) In the full model, BRI Q4 retained marginal significance (OR = 11.70, P = 0.053), while BMI-based and waist-based obesity remained non-significant.

The incidence of secondary procedures was reduced at a marginal significance (OR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.53-1.00, P = 0.053) when comparing IMN to MIPO, and was significantly reduced when comparing IMN to plate fixation in the subgroup excluding open fractures (OR = 0.67, 95%CI 0.47–0.94, P = 0.021).

As for its statistical analysis result, it showed only marginal significance ( P = 0.053) in the final multivariable model, but it was retained after the rigorous screening process.

Although the inclusion of β2-microglobulin level showed marginal significance ( P = .053), it was retained in the analysis.

Nurses aged more than 30 reported higher levels of anxiety than those aged 30 or less with a marginal significance ( p = 0.053).

Overall, women had a higher frequency of chronic low self-esteem than men, albeit at marginal significance: 16.5% vs. 4.5% (Pearson’s chi-squared = 3.744; p = 0.053).

For parents, support provision was explained both by linear effects of their own anxiety ( B 1 = −0.30, SE = 0.05, p < 0.001) and by quadratic effects reflecting higher levels of their own anxiety, which reached marginal significance ( B 3 = 0.07, SE = 0.04, p = 0.053).

For instance, in left maxillary 1st premolars, the marginal significance ( p = 0.053) for 1MPM1 suggests a potential shift in root canal anatomy with increasing age.

ASA physical status analysis revealed ASA(2) patients had a 74.9% lower risk than ASA(3) counterparts (OR = 0.251, 95% CI : 0.063–1.001, P = 0.050), while ASA(1) showed marginal significance (OR = 0.032, P = 0.053).

Four of these studies [ 17 , 44 , 48 , 49 ] indicated statistically significant benefits, while one study [ 47 ] reported marginal significance ( p = 0.053), and two studies [ 43 , 45 ] showed no statistically significant differences between the hepatectomy combined with EBRT and hepatectomy alone.

The results revealed two pathways potentially associated with Lac-Tyr, which reached marginal significance: the biosynthesis from tryptophan to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD + ) via quinolinate (adjusted P -value = 0.053), also known as Kynurenine pathway, and Mucin type O-glycan biosynthesis (adjusted P -value = 0.063).

Compared to the best existing multi-modal approach (MM-TransFuse), our method showed significant improvements in AUC ( p = 0.008, DeLong test) and sensitivity ( p = 0.012), with marginal significance for specificity ( p = 0.053).

3G ) were confirmed lower in plasmas of LUADs than HCs but only reaching marginal significance ( P = 0.053).