“marginal significance”

Offline engagement was partially explained in the model including readiness to change as the predictor but with marginal significance ( F 3 =2.719; R 2 =0.111; P =.05).

In terms of study design, cohort studies showed higher UA levels in severe cases with marginal significance ( P = 0.05, Hedges’ g = 2.49, 95% CI 0.02–4.97, I 2 = 98.11%, 2 studies), while cross-sectional studies did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.08, Hedges’ g = 4.00, 95% CI − 0.44 to 8.44, I 2 = 99.09%, 4 studies).

Pairwise comparisons only reached marginal significance between AD and FTD ( p = 0.050 and p = 0.082, respectively).

Marginal significance was set at P < 0.05.

Direct association of FOXP3 + TILs with VSA t2 was noted (marginal significance p = 0.05; Fig. 4 e).

Several other associations reached marginal significance ( p > 0.05, p < 0.10).

The number of RBPMS+ cells was lower in the high-pressure group compared to the control group with marginal significance (p = 0.050), whereas the number of RBPMS+ showed no significant differences in the low-pressure group compared with the control group (p = 0.500) (Fig. 1 D).

After the removal of associations with P-HEIDI <0.01, a total of 247 CpG sites near 115 unique genes passed the marginal significance (P < 0.05) ( Table S2 ).

In particular, Cu was the only mineral that exhibited a marginal significance (0.01 < p < 0.05) in relation to the plant part and LxP variation, with no significant result observed for harvest location.

However, there were higher variations in host and viral sequence contamination detected in FL samples, with marginal significance ( p = 0.05, Levene’s test of homogeneity of variance).

The overall incidence of irAEs was higher with marginal significance in East-Asian/Hispanic/African (62.6% vs 54.3%; P = .05).

In the HBOT group, PPT increased in 70.8 ± 90.6 kPa, compared to increase of 20.1 ± 85.7 kPa in the MED group, group-by-time interaction demonstrated marginal significance with medium effect size (d = 0.57, p = 0.05).

Using rs9939224 as a covariate, we found that 13 of the 23 SNPs, in which minor alleles were negatively associated with the SCORE2‐OP‐ Lipid (β<0), were independent of rs9939224 (conditional P <0.05, considered marginal significance).

Univariate Kaplan–Meier/ Log-rank analyses revealed that high-grade adenosarcomas and tumors with SOG statistically showed marginal significance (p=0.05).

No significance in BMI was observed between the two interventions overall and in individual follow-up periods, except for a marginal significance (p = 0.05) favoring RYGB in the two to three-year interval.

We found 176 protein-SMF pairings with marginal significance ( p < 0.05).

Notably, we discerned three protein-MS pairs reaching marginal significance levels from the deCODE (P < 0.05 for two-sample MR analysis).

A total of 165 protein-CAD associations were identified at the marginal significance level ( p < 0.05) through the proteome-wide MR analysis.

PP analyses largely confirmed the full sample findings, with the exception of concurrent mental health treatment reaching marginal significance ( p = 0.05, Supplementary Table 3 ).

We found a marginal significance when comparing wound swabs and biopsies in terms of unsuccessful isolation of pathogens (20 vs. 17, p = 0.05).

Additionally, certain indicators exhibited marginal significance differences (0.1 > p > 0.05), such as DriSucc% in the elite group and GCA, ShortCmp, Def 3rd, Mid 3rd and DriMis in the control group.

The CD25 MFI on the Teff cells decreased slightly with marginal significance in the antibody group ( p < 0.05) and increased more than fourfold in the complex group ( p < 0.0001) compared to the control group (Fig. 4 d).

12.2 ± 6.7 points, p = 0.04), and higher scores of anxiety symptoms with a marginal significance level (8.5 ± 4.4 vs. 6.2 ± 3.6 points, p = 0.05), according to HADS ( Table 1 ).

Of the four pairwise joint models including six unique genes, all the associations were attenuated but retained marginal significance (P<0.05).

Both of them showed marginal significance ( p = 0.05), which may be related to the fluency state being a higher psychological state of competitive sports psychology, and it may also be related to the level of athletes’ trait mindfulness and the time effect of mindfulness training.