“marginal significance”

In the present study, tumor grade showed marginal significance (p=0.066) only for recurrence-free survival.

Prior cancer history showed marginal significance (p=0.066) and was not retained.

Critically, when both components were entered simultaneously in the full sample, the unique prospective effect of psychological investment on body dissatisfaction reached marginal significance from T2 to T3 ( β = 0.08, p = 0.066), whereas behavioral engagement showed no significant unique effect at either interval (T1 → T2: β = −0.05, p = 0.30; T2 → T3: β = −0.06, p = 0.15).

Associations with anxiety for their part tended to be weaker than associations with other mental disorders, reaching statistical significance for cross-sectional studies in t -test comparisons with personality disorder ( t = 2.61, df = 33, two-sided p = 0.014) and marginal significance ( t = 1.86, df = 97, two-sided p = 0.066) with depression.

GMNN gene amplification also showed marginal significance with the age of clinical onset of HCC ( P = 0.0663; Figure 8 ) and tumor size ( P = 0.0899; data not shown).

The annual number of live births also showed a positive correlation with the bundle implementation index score for the obstetrical hemorrhage safety bundle, with a marginal significance (correlation coefficient = 0.32; 95% CI = −0.027−0.590; p = 0.0664).

The means of GC and GCDC were higher in BA than in neonatal jaundice infants with marginal significance (GC: 2.71±2.26 μmol/L vs 1.31±1.11 μmol/L, p = 0.0664; GCDC: 0.94±0.55 μmol/L vs 0.63±0.54 μmol/L, p = 0.0967).

In the first aggregated region spanning the area from Cl2 until V, linear mixed models revealed a main effect of COMP, which however shows up with a marginal significance [ χ ( 1 ) 2 = 3 . 365 , p = 0.0666].

By percentage comparison, we identified a larger percentage of CD63/81+ sEVs in enucleated AH with marginal significance (22.5 ± 11.3%, enucleated versus 7.10 ± 1.41%, salvaged, P = 0.0667; see Fig. 4 E).

The association relationship reached statistical significance in the discovery dataset ( p = 1.37 × 10 −3 , FDR = 7.52 × 10 −3 ), and marginal significance ( p = 6.67 × 10 −2 ) in the validation dataset.

Furthermore, the interaction of stimulus, task, and group reached significance for the frontal area ( F 1, 50 = 5.001, P = 0.030, η 2 = 0.091) and central area ( F 1, 50 = 4.537, P = 0.038, η 2 = 0.083), and marginal significance for the occipital area ( F 1, 50 = 3.515, P = 0.067, η 2 = 0.066).

The main effect of parafoveal word frequency was not significant on all fixation times and skipping probability (fixation times:| t |s < 1.84, p s > 0.05; skipping probability: z = −1.38, p = 0.167), but there was a marginal significance on gaze time ( t = 1.83, p = 0.067), indicating shorter processing time when the parafoveal word was of high frequency compared to low frequency.

Partial correlations for sustained post-error slowing also demonstrated more negative correlations between post-error slowing and baseline RT (controlling for ER; M = −0.471, SD = 0.589) than between post-error slowing and ER (controlling for baseline RT; M = 0.129, SD = 0.756) although only achieving marginal significance ( t (16) = 1.97, p = 0.067; see Figure 4 ).

H&E cross-sections of extraorbital glands show few inflammation foci in IRT-5-treated mice than in PBS-treated mice with a marginal significance ( p = 0.067, Mann–Whitney U test; Figure 3 A,B).

The marginal significance ( P = 0.067) yielded for the P3 effects suggests caution should be taken when interpreting such effects.

Two differences from the AFDP results include that the AHB marriage effects (1) first reached nonsignificance at the second-to-last age bin of 31–34 (rather than at the last age bin in AFDP) and (2) appeared to reverse direction at the last age bin of 35–39 such that becoming married predicted increased problem drinking at these ages (albeit with only “marginal significance” of p = .067).

After adjusting for multiple variables ( Table 2 ), the ORs of the 1 st quintile was also larger than the OR of the 5 th quintile with marginal significance ( P = 0.067).

Although the state × condition interaction reached only marginal significance ( F (1, 71) = 3.46, p = 0.067, η p 2 = 0.046), post-hoc comparisons revealed a consistent pattern: fair proposals induced significantly higher interbrain global efficiency than unfair proposals in both state 1 ( t = 3.856, p FDR = 3.34 × 10 -4 , Cohen’s d = 0.454, 95% CI = [0.005, 0.014]) and state 2 ( t = 2.478, p FDR = 0.016, Cohen’s d = 0.292, 95% CI = [0.001, 0.009]).

The results indicate that for the left eye AOI the difference between the two groups was not significant, although marginal significance was observed, F (1,35) = 3.56, p = .067.

Further in-depth analysis revealed that in the HOMA-IR ≥1.73 group, the rate of change in lactate levels was positively correlated with the rate of change in HOMA-IR, FBG and FPI levels; in the FBG ≥6.1 mM group, the FPI levels dropped significantly and FBG levels reduced with a marginal significance ( p = 0.067).

Parasites from Nepal had the highest dN – dS value with marginal significance (1.845; P = 0.067) (Table 2 ).

In multivariate analysis, only older age (≥65 years) and the presence of ENE were independent prognostic factors for DSS ( p = .002 and p < .001, respectively), and salivary MMP‐1 showed marginal significance for predicting DSS ( p = .067, 95% CI: 0.974–2.094; Table S1 ). 4.

7.5%) with a marginal significance (p = 0.067) in a t-test.

A randomized controlled trial in 96 patients showed that lymphoblastoid IFN 5 MU in combination with thymosin α-1 1.6 mg 3 times weekly for 24 weeks increased HBeAg loss 1 year after the end of treatment with marginal significance in comparison with IFN monotherapy (45.8% vs. 28%; P = 0.067) [ 57 ].

The withdrawal rates were slightly higher in the group A with marginal significance (14.3% in group A vs. 5.6% in group B; p = 0.067).