After adjusting for covariates, the group × time interaction coefficient for outpatient clinic visits was 1.83 among all participants (marginal significance; p = 0.062) and 4.58 ( p < 0.01) among those with low income.
← all phrases
“marginal significance”
Sighted at
p=0.07
In the literature
Both Personal-Negative and Social-Negative scores decreased ( t =−2.47 and −2.37 respectively, both p s <.01), while the increase in Personal-Positive score had marginal significance ( t = 1.99, p =.062).
22.6, 10.0, 31.6; U = 72, P = 0.002) and, at marginal significance, in a comparison between pairs of queens from stock A and stock B that had mated each with exactly the same male (n = 11, Wilcoxon matched pairs test, T = 12, P = 0.062).
A positive correlation was found between the score for each dimension and the total DRRS score, while no significant difference was found between DRRS score (total score and score for each dimension) and the D score of implicit attitudes (only existed a marginal significance ( p = 0.062) between the compulsivity for drug use and D score of implicit attitudes).
The SUV mean of adenomas showed a positive correlation with nadir cortisol levels on the HD DST ( P = 0.014) and preoperative ACTH levels, with marginal significance ( P = 0.062).
In this case, however, values under absorptive state (24.67 ± 1.50) only showed marginal significance (Bonferroni post-hoc , p = 0.062) when compared to the control sample (26.73 ± 1.76).
41%, p = 0.062 with a marginal significance) prior to CVD debut than to ED, as Table 2 shows.
Among comorbidities, only hypertension was significantly associated with long COVID (OR = 1.752, p < 0.001), while other conditions like diabetes showed marginal significance (OR = 1.582, p = 0.062), and most others had wide confidence intervals and non-significant p -values.
In contrast, ventral neurons exhibited an increased intensity with marginal significance ( P = 0.062).
As shown in Figure 2 , the area below ROC curve of CHAID decision tree was larger than that of logistic regression analysis with marginal significance (0.722 vs. 0.656, P = 0.062), both of which were away from reference line.
The meta-analysis of IPW-adjusted estimates confirmed the inverted U-shaped pattern, with 8 h sleep significantly associated with poorer cognition (β = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.07 to -0.03, P = 0.008), while 9 h and ≥ 10 h showed negative associations with marginal significance after FDR correction (both P = 0.062).
Moreover, the interaction between gender and educational level showed marginal significance, suggesting that there may be some interaction effect between being male and having a secondary educational level [206.29 (−0.01–0.01), p = 0.062].
5 g), albeit with only marginal significance for this genetic background (Temperature, P = 0.062).
Overall, linear regression analysis indicated a significant upward trend in new HIV cases ( p = 0.038, R 2 = 0.43), although Spearman correlation testing showed only marginal significance ( p = 0.062).
Critically, they did not improve as a function of session (two-sided sign test p>0.05 in 4 out of 5 sessions; note the marginal significance of cohort performance in the fourth session, p=0.0625, N = 4) ( Figure 3B–C ).
However, several other indicators, such as the Acceptability Rating Scale (ARS) ( p = 0.0625, r = 1.0), the System Usability Scale (SUS) ( p = 0.0625, r = 1.0), and the psychosocial impact (PIADS), showed marginal significance ( p = 0.0625, r = 1.0) favoring the BCI-based approach.
The KEGG pathway for biosynthesis of secondary metabolites was upregulated with a high level of significance in the direct, high treatment ( Figures 5 , 7 , p < 0.001; Supplementary Figure 4 ) and was also upregulated with marginal significance in the direct, low treatment ( Supplementary Table 4 , p = 0.0626).
Moderating effects of genetic variants on stage of illness development for gene expression and protein levels As indicated in Table 2 , for log mRNA expression levels, there was marginal significance of an interaction between the BDNF genotype and illness development stage after adjustments ( p = 0.063).
The marginal significance at M3 ( p = 0.063), though not strong, may indicate a trend worthy of further investigation and could have clinical implications for the management of transplant patients concerning SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Impact of RT dose on survival outcomes As for disease-free survival (DFS), multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative CA 19-9 value was the only factor significantly associated with DFS ( p = 0.040, Supplementary Table 1 ), whereas pathologic N stage showed marginal significance ( p = 0.063).
In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference between the rapid PAP and black rice extract staining methods ( p =0.974), and marginal significance was found for the difference between black rice extract and SpermBlue ( p =0.063).
However, there was no significant difference in the age group of < 65 years (1.6%, P -value = .500), and the age group of ≥75 years showed a marginal significance (1.6%, P -value = .063), indicating a possible but not conclusive association.
In the stroke cohort, the interaction patterns were similar, with statistical significance achieved in Models 1 and 3 (Model 1 p=0.043; Model 3 p=0.047) and marginal significance in Model 2 (p=0.063).
Multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, race, and surgery severity showed that before surgery blood glucose may be an independent predictor of mortality with marginal significance ( P = 0.063) and likewise with postoperative blood glucose concentration ( P = 0.087).
There was also an association in the homozygous CC women’s group, but with marginal significance ( p = 0.063).