“marginal significance”

Conner’s Teacher rating Scale (CTRS) showed a significant reduction in inattention compared to the beginning ( p = 0.07) and compared to the placebo ( p = 0.049), and the score for hyperactivity of Conner’s Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) decreased with a marginal significance compared to the placebo after 1 month of treatment with Pycnogenol ® ( p = 0.065).

Consistent with Munkhbayarlakh et al.’s 2019 published data [ 14 ], ApaI (rs7975232) was also not found in association with the disease in the Taiwanese and Mongolian groups; however, the VDR FokI (rs2228570) GG genotype played significant roles in terms of conferring the risk of asthma and showed marginal significance in the Taiwan group ( p = 0.065).

Relative to the control, treatment with native fucoidan and nanoparticle fucoidan resulted in reduction of tumor tissue weight, though the effect of the latter was significant ( P < 0.05) compared with marginal significance for the former ( P = 0.065) ( Figure 3 B).

12 , 14 , 15 However, although with marginal significance ( p = 0.065), patients with a normal Pv–aCO 2 cleared their blood lactate over 24 hours as shown by others. 16 , 27 Interestingly, the lactate clearance was accompanied by a lower ScvO 2 during the first 6 hours which together may indicate a higher blood flow and less hypoperfusion in several patients.

Post hoc tests revealed significant gender differences in trials with moderate payoff ( t 42 = 2.16, p = 0.04, d = 0.65) as well as high payoff ( t 42 = 3.29, p = 0.003, d = 0.99), but marginal significance in trials with low payoff ( t 42 = 1.91, p = 0.065, d = 0.58) ( Figure 2 ).

Popularity obtained marginal significance [ t (30) = 1.91, p = .065].

Global mean network strength during rest showed only marginal significance for positive connectivity between TBI (M = 2,139.24, SD = 332.06) and HCs (M = 1,944.74, SD = 251.40) [( t ) = −1.835, Cohen’s d = 0.66, p = 0.065] and for negative connectivity between TBI (M = 1,183.84, SD = 258.53) and HCs (M = 1,036.80, SD = 167.53) [( t ) = −1.979, Cohen’s d = 0.68, p = 0.057], see Figure 2 .

The increase in PC risk associated with DNMT3A reached marginal significance when compared to the GnomAD cohort ( p = 0.0650, OR = 3.6707, 95% CI: 0.7619–15.4792).

Marginal significance was found for the association between time to shivering and fat mass index (r=0.400; p = 0.065).

In patients with no microbleeds on MRI, WMH ≥ 2 alone showed marginal significance in suggesting an increased K trans in the putamen and parietal WM ( p = 0.065 and p = 0.055, respectively).

For the SLCO1B1 521T > C genotypes, in male patients, the risk of enalapril-induced cough in SLCO1B1 521C allele carriers was higher compared with TT genotype carriers, with marginal significance (OR = 2.06, 95%CI = 0.92–4.62 , P = 0.065), while female patients were still strongly associated with SLCO1B1 521T > C genotypes distribution (OR = 2.04, 95%CI = 1.16–3.60, P = 0.012).

A lower Qmax was observed in the severe symptom group with marginal significance (p=0.065).

For the fecundity models, adding evolutionary environment significantly improved model fit (χ2 = 8.95, df = 2, p = 0.011), with parent generation showing marginal significance (χ2 = 3.42, df = 1, p = 0.065; Supplementary Tables 11 and 12 ).

As predicted in Hypothesis 3, feminist identification was associated with more perceived discrimination, albeit only with marginal significance ( b = 0.08, SE = 0.04, p = .065).

Grouping studies by study design and source of controls revealed only marginal significance for the comparison of alleles ε4 with ε3 in hospital-based studies (OR =1.33, 95% CI =0.98–1.79, P =0.065, I 2 =30.2%).

MiR-422a was up-regulated with marginal significance (P = 0.065) in the low compared with the high BMD group in the array analysis.

After adjustment for clinical covariates, the only bacterial factor associated with increased incidence of treatment failure was the hVISA phenotype (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.420, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.946–6.191) though with marginal significance ( P = 0.0652).

There was only marginal significance with regard to the burning sensation ( p = 0.0653) ( Table 2 ).

After adjustment for clinical covariates ( Table 3 ), rad-risk obtained independent significance with HR of 4.3 (95% CI: 2.0–9.1, p < 0.001), while age showed marginal significance (HR: 6.8, 95% CI: 0.9–52.5, p = 0.066).

The interference effect was increased in patients with schizophrenia with a marginal significance level ( p = 0.066).

At 6 months postoperatively, the PD group exhibited higher WBC ( p = 0.001), ANC ( p < 0.001), NLR ( p = 0.011), and PLT ( p = 0.031) than those in the non-PD group; a higher PLR, with marginal significance ( p = 0.066), was also observed in the PD group.

In the femto-LASIK group, mean residual astigmatism in those with mild astigmatism was lower than those with severe astigmatism with marginal significance ( P = 0.066) at one year after surgery.

Controlling for potential confounding variables (age, BMI, and MAP) slightly reduced the significance level of this interaction effect to marginal significance ( P = .066).

The ADS contributed independently to test anxiety with marginal significance (Δ R 2 = .015, F = 3.430, df = 163, P = .066) and to negative affect (Δ R 2 = .002, F = 1.091, df = 163, P = .298), suggesting a small incremental validity of ADS over AADS on negative criteria.

The sex-stratified analyses on coworker support were also conducted since the interaction of sex and coworker support had shown marginal significance (p=0.066).