marginally non-significantp = 0.06
Patients with an increase in BI during geriatric hospital treatment had a marginally non-significant lower number of uncompensated problems (5.6 vs. 7.2; p = 0.06) than those with no change or decrease in BI.
Patients with an increase in BI during geriatric hospital treatment had a marginally non-significant lower number of uncompensated problems (5.6 vs. 7.2; p = 0.06) than those with no change or decrease in BI.
A significant expertise-by-complexity interaction, F (1, 28) = 4.640, p = 0.04, suggested that non-musicians were less sensitive to stylistic differences; moreover, a marginally non-significant complexity-by-entropy interaction, F (1, 28) = 3.763, p = 0.06, suggested that the complex stimuli might not have produced the expected main effects of entropy.
For SD CoP in AP direction, a marginally non-significant effect was observed when comparing pre- and post-Exo data of individuals with MS with that of HSs and (F(2,20) = 3.25, p = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.24).
For the two latter species, results are marginally non-significant ( P = 0.06, Table 1 ).
The number of alleles ( n a ) and the allelic richness ( R S ) of the low altitude class (<2,300 m a.s.l.: n a = 39 and R S = 5.57) were lower than those of the intermediate altitude class (2,300-2,800 m a.s.l.: n a = 50 and R S = 7.10; difference marginally non-significant, P = 0.06, Wilcoxon signed-paired rank test, after Bonferroni correction) and of the high altitude class (>2800 m a.s.l.: n a = 57, P = 0.06, and R S = 7.40, P = 0.09).
This is also reflected in m 1 and T crit showing a marginally non-significant ( P =0.06) positive correlation also ( Supplementary Table S3 ).
When we excluded the study by Reis and Källén 1 the odds ratio remained within this range (odds ratio of 2.4) but was marginally non-significant (P=0.06).
Cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin concentrations There were no differences among Al treatments or between populations in the concentrations of cellulose or lignin in either leaves or stems (S4-S6 Tables in S1 Appendix ), but both these fractions declined significantly in root tissues in response to Al addition ( Fig 3 ) and there was a parallel decline in hemicellulose concentrations in roots that was marginally non-significant (F 2,30 = 3.09, P = 0.060, S4 Table in S1 Appendix ).
While a significant between-group difference was reported for 'getting along with others' in Table 3 the imputed analysis produced a marginally non-significant difference (odds ratio 0.6; 95% CI 0.4 to 1.0; p = 0.06).
14% (40/286)), albeit with a marginally non-significant difference ( p = 0.06) ( Table 2 ).
Statistical tests indicated that their differences were marginally non-significant ( p = 0.06).
However, in colony pairs 4 and 5, controls were less aggressive; this difference was significant in colony pair 4 (GLM: t 40 = 2.02, p = 0.04) and marginally non-significant in pair 5 (GLM: t 26 = 1.96, p = 0.06).
There are several potential explanations for our finding that SP expression was weakly increased, in addition to the possibility that the marginally non-significant result ( P = 0.06) arose by chance.
Finally, the reduction in miR-107 in patient-derived muscle biopsies was marginally non-significant ( p value = 0.06) ( Figure 1 G).
For the person with stroke, the results indicated a marginally non-significant time effect for improvements in depressive symptoms (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.78, F(2, 23) = 3.23, p = 0.06).
This split into a significant decrease in courtship directed to females (t 3 = 5.54, p = 0.01) and a marginally non-significant decrease in courtship directed to other males (t 3 = 3.07, p = 0.06, table 2 ).
A similar pattern was observed in the DLPFC, although results in neuritic plaque-positive participants were marginally non-significant (p = 0.06).
While multimodal therapy showed lower mean pain scores than opioid-based regimens, the difference between these two groups was marginally non-significant (p = 0.060), suggesting a trend but not definitive superiority in terms of pain reduction.
Marginally non-significant evidence was observed for a positive relationship with K. pneumoniae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (β = 0.172; 95%CI = −0.008; 0.351; p = 0.060), and a negative relationship with MRSA (β = −0.172; 95%CI = −0.350; 0.006; p = 0.059) and E. coli resistant to aminopenicillins (β = −0.219; 95%CI = −0.449; 0.012; p = 0.063).
= 30, P = 0.69), had similar genetic diversity ( Z = 0.78, P = 0.43) and, although marginally non-significant, F ST values were of similar magnitude as that obtained from the entire data set ( F ST = 0.001, P = 0.06).
Subgroup analyses showed: Chinese populations had a significant positive association (OR = 2.58, 95% CI: 2.19–3.03, I 2 = 61%, p < 0.001), while the association in American populations was marginally non-significant (OR = 2.80, 95% CI: 0.94–8.31, I 2 = 71%, p = 0.06); Prospective cohorts (OR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.27–3.59, I 2 = 83%, p = 0.004) and retrospective cohorts (OR = 2.75, 95% CI: 2.31–3.28, I 2 = 23%, p < 0.001) both showed significant positive associations, with no significant between-subgroup differences ( p = 0.66); Large-sample studies (≥5,000 participants) had a stable, significant association (OR = 2.63, 95% CI: 2.41–2.88, I 2 = 12%, p < 0.001), while small-sample studies (<5,000 participants) also showed a significant association (OR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.41–5.47, I 2 = 78%, p = 0.003).
The study observed a marginally non-significant increase of HPV prevalence among OPC cases diagnosed after 2010 (45 vs. 28.3%, p = 0.06) [ 6 ].
During the steady state portion of the flight, P O2 in normoxia (steady state EMM = 42.30 ± 2.49 mmHg) dropped slightly so moderate hypoxia (steady state EMM = 33.59 ± 3.40 mmHg) was marginally non-significant (t = −2.373, p=0.0600) while P O2 in severe hypoxia (steady state EMM = 29.61 ± 4.21) remained significantly different from normoxia (t = −2.881, p=0.0152).
The rank correlation was significant in winter (Spearman rho = 1, P = 0.003), but marginally non-significant in summer (rho = 0.55, P = 0.06) and fall (rho = 0.39, P = 0.12).
The effect of negative attentional bias was marginally non-significant (β = 0.12, p < .06) when the effect of other variables was taken into consideration.