“marginally non-significant”

Having anal sex with 5+ non-regular male sex partners was marginally non-significant at the p<.05 level (AOR: 1.8, 95%CI: 1.0,3.5; p = .067).

The Wilcoxon test showed that the difference in FSS-7 score was marginally non-significant (p = 0.05, effect size = 0.37).

From pre-test (study entry) to post-test (end of study), there was no significant change in CES-D score (Wilcoxon p -value = 0.13), BAI score (Wilcoxon p -value = 0.50), TPS score (Wilcoxon p-value = 0.15), while CASE-cancer score decreased from pre- to post-test, marginally non-significant (Wilcoxon p-value = 0.05) (Fig. 2 a).

Demographic analyses Fu’s F S value was negative and significant (-16.5, P < 0.02), whereas Tajima’s D was also negative but marginally non-significant (-1.31, P = 0.05) for P. integrifolia ssp. depauperata .

Further, when patients were dichotomized based on the disease control rate (“DCR”), a significantly longer OS was exhibited in the disease control compared to no-disease control group according to PERCIST (p = 0.01), PERCIMT (p = 0.01) and iPERCIST (p = 0.01), while a similar, marginally non-significant trend was also observed after application of EORTC (p = 0.05).

Wasps were also more abundant by a marginally non-significant amount in yellow traps compared with white traps (t 7.0 = 2.93, p = 0.05).

The variables examined were: aerobic capacity for exercise, lung function, anxiety and depression, with non-significant improvement for the MRC Dyspnea scale, marginally non-significant improvement regarding 6MWT ( p = 0.05) and significant improvement for FEV1 ( p < 0.05).

A meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of incorporating VR into PR for patients with COPD noted that VR enhanced the therapeutic effects of PR with significant improvements in FEV1 ( p < 0.05) and marginally non-significant improvements in 6MWT ( p = 0.05) [ 84 ].

In addition, we observed a marginally non-significant main effect of gender , F (1,115) = 3.84, MSE = 9.23, p = .05, ηp 2 = .032, with boys keeping a higher number of stickers ( M = 9.01, SE = 0.36) than girls ( M = 8.00, SE = 0.39; Fig 1B ).

The CTL group’s SampEn complexity comparison was marginally non-significant (p > 0.05).

Although the comparison between P-fed sNPF 1 bees and P-fed untreated bees was marginally non-significant ( Figure 2 B, W = 174.5, p = 0.05), a clear enhancement of appetitive responsiveness was detected in P-fed sNPF 10 bees.

Contrary to expectations that synapsids would follow a consistently optimal path toward a more therian morphology, our results based on reconstructed landscapes for major nodes show statistically significant fluctuations in optimality across the major synapsid groups (with marginally non-significant effects of centroid size; RPPP ANOVA, p < 0.05, see S7 Table ).

Although marginally non-significant (p-value = 0.050, df = 4), the G-test results showed a tendency for gomphid larvae to display a natural post-mortem position, with the hind legs extended laterally and the forelegs extended close to the body.

At 0.05 μg/mL CTX, the t-test result shows a marginally non-significant difference (at p < 0.05) in the filamentary frequency of co-culture (M = 0.76133, SD = 0.0647) and monoculture (M = 0.508, SD = 0.1445), t (n-1 = 2) = 2.7714, p = 0.050259.

Some support for this contention comes from the fact that there was a marginally non-significant negative correlation between proportion of short-delay choices and mean log-latency to initiate trials on illumination of the amber light ( r 27 = − 0.37, p = 0.05).

A marginally non-significant effect of TMS was also found ( P = 0.05, cluster-corrected).

In addition, post-earthquake mean maximum temperature and pre-earthquake mean rain days had a marginally non-significant association (p = 0.05 – 0.10).

The association of hookworm infection with HIV status was marginally non-significant (p = 0.05).

Results ApEn and PE values in different anesthesia-awakening stages For ApEn values, ANOVA analysis ( Table 1 ) revealed significant main effects for the factors “stage” ( F 2,24 = 25.127; p = 0.000; partial η 2 = 0.677) and “sex” ( F 1,12 = 5.033; p = 0.045; partial η 2 = 0.295) but marginally non-significant effect for the factor “brain area” ( F 5,60 = 2.373; p = 0.050; partial η 2 = 0.165), but no significant interaction between factors was observed.

Furthermore, gossypol caused a 3.44-fold rise in p62 protein levels, but ponatinib demonstrated a marginally non-significant increase ( P > 0.05).

As shown in Table 10 , the Gray test yielded a marginally non-significant P = 0.050 (unrounded P = 0.0501 ), suggesting insufficient evidence for prognostic differences among subtypes.

The effect on muscle mass, measured by skeletal muscle index, was marginally non-significant (SMD 0.25 ±0.13, 95% CI –0.006–0.51, p = 0.05), and no significant effect on appendicular skeletal muscle mass or muscle performance (measured by walking speed) was observed [ 84 ].

The relationship between BMI and carbonated beverage intake (kcal) was marginally non-significant, positive, and weak (ρ = 0.100, p = 0.05).

The variables examined were: aerobic capacity for exercise, lung function, anxiety and depression, with non-significant improvement for the MRC Dyspnea scale, marginally non-significant improvement regarding 6MWT ( p = 0.05) and significant improvement for FEV1 ( p < 0.05).

However, the mediation effect was marginally non-significant (β = −0.04, p < 0.05, 95% CI [−0.08, 0.00]).