The effect on muscle mass, measured by skeletal muscle index, was marginally non-significant (SMD 0.25 ±0.13, 95% CI –0.006–0.51, p = 0.05), and no significant effect on appendicular skeletal muscle mass or muscle performance (measured by walking speed) was observed [ 84 ].
The CTL group’s SampEn complexity comparison was marginally non-significant (p > 0.05).
However, this difference was marginally non-significant (P=.05) Finally, a multiple regression analysis was conducted on the scores obtained by the participants, including sex and age as variables.
Reported genes included genes exhibiting any expression change that was significant (p<0.05) or had more than 2-fold change (100%) but was statistically marginally non-significant (p = 0.05–0.2). 2.3.
The Mix treatment also harboured 20.9% unique ASVs, though this difference was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.0502).
5C ; P = 0.0161, Mann–Whitney test) and a marginally non-significant difference for those in complex clusters ( P = 0.0506, Mann–Whitney test).
The interaction between Treatment and Life-stage in this model was removed from the model as it was marginally non-significant and uninformative for our research question ( P = 0.0506).
There was a marginally non-significant correlation between the balance point at baseline and state anxiety ratings over time ( r = −0.272, N = 52, p = 0.051) in the intervention group, whereby those with a lower balance point at baseline (i.e. higher negative bias) showed a greater reduction in state anxiety post-training.
Begg’s test showed no significant effect (p = 0.532), whereas Egger’s test indicated a marginally non-significant trend toward a small study effect ( p = 0.051), suggesting potential publication bias.
Fig 2C presents PC2 score distributions showing a marginally non-significant trend (p = 0.051) toward higher PC2 values in young subjects.
Second, ANOSIM analysis showed that overall microbial community separation among treatments was marginally non-significant (R = 0.17, p = 0.051).
The BEI treatment showed a marginally non-significant difference ( p = 0.051) with FA.
Marginally non-significant partner effects revealed greater anxiety was linked to lower partner reports of child overall health ( b = − 0.14, p = 0.051).
Despite the full MAM being marginally non-significant (MAM6 : treatment; p = 0.051, table 1 ; full model 6 in the electronic supplementary material, table S11; figure 4A ), this suggests a systemic PRR response to the poly(I:C) stimulation.
Since the levels of induced threat in the implicit and explicit threat conditions are descriptively different in the expected direction but marginally non-significant and at the same time show a medium effect size, t (209.47) = 2.35, p = .051, d = .32, 95%- CI [0.05; 0.58], the distinction between those levels is rather ambiguous.
a marginally non-significant interaction between sex and age (p = 0.051), with anti-KLH nIgM decreasing with age in females.
This association, however, weakens and becomes marginally non-significant in the multivariate model (β = 0.13, p = 0.051), suggesting that gender differences in health behaviors may be influenced by other demographic and health factors.
In adjusted models, LAIB was a marginally non-significant predictor of QoL (p=0.051) (see table 3 ).
However, the post-hoc tests concerning the comparison of the groups with respect to body mass did not reach statistical significance although the difference between naMCI and HC was marginally non-significant (W ( n naMCI = 21, n HC = 27) = −3.310, p = 0.051).
Preliminary analyses performed in a subset of animals (Supplementary Materials) showed a marginally non-significant nonlinear correlation between PhNR amplitude and Aβ42 concentration (Spearman’s ρ = -0.59, p = 0.051).
Based on the findings, the frequency of CC genotype in the placental TP53 -rs1042522 polymorphism was lower in the PE group compared to controls, but the difference was marginally non-significant ( P = 0.051).
The percentage of all evidence-practice gap publications that involved intervention studies ranged from a minimum of 8.5% in 2001 to a maximum of 23% in 2006, a trend over time that was marginally non-significant (Cochran Armitage Trend Test Z = 1.9514, p = 0.0510).
Snails from SH-2 showed similar patterns, but these results were marginally non-significant ( figure 2 b ; electronic supplementary material, table S4; p = 0.051).
One compound, 2-heptanol, had a strong tendency towards a repellent effect, with 65% of the flies choosing the control side, although this repellent effect was strictly speaking marginally non-significant after FDR correction ( p = 0.051).
A marginally non-significant ( p = 0.051) association of CB leptin concentration and weight change was observed.