“marginally non-significant”

aPTT was marginally non-significant in the final model ( P = .059).

When the RAR was analyzed by quartiles, compared to the lowest quartile (Q1, reference), Q2 showed significantly increased odds of PD in the crude model (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.09–2.50, p = 0.018) and Model 1 (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.02–2.36, p = 0.039), but this association became marginally non-significant in Model 2 (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.99–2.27, p = 0.059) and Model 3 (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 0.96–2.30, p = 0.076).

We included a year of sampling as a fixed effect in all models and found that all the immune traits varied significantly between years (LRT P < 0.001), apart from IL-4 where the year was marginally non-significant ( χ 2 = 7.43, Degrees of Freedom (DF) = 3, P = 0.059).

The baseline UI stage was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.059), while age, BMI, and time to rehabilitation were not statistically significant predictors. 4.

Breeding success and productivity were also lower for birds based on field monitoring estimates compared to using field-corrected GPS data, although these differences were marginally non-significant (success: X 2 = 1.22, d.f. = 2, p = 0.059; productivity: X 2 = 0.79, d.f. = 2, p = 0.077; figure 2 b , c ).

Furthermore, there was a similar but marginally non-significant difference between the two groups in functional well-being score ( p = 0.059) and FACT-HEP total score ( p = 0.061) in the second month ( Fig. 5 ).

We found a small, marginally non-significant positive period × time interaction ( β = 0.002, 95% CI [−0.000, 0.004], t (49) = 1.946, p =.059), a non-significant effect of time ( β = −0.001, 95% CI [−0.003, 0.000], t (49) = −1.605, p =.117), and a significant negative effect of period ( β = −0.073, 95% CI [−0.135, −0.012], t (49) = −2.402, p =.021) (Supplementary Table S6, Figure S4).

A two-factor ANOVA with the between-subject factors “modality” and “processing” revealed a marginally non-significant interaction of both conditions [ F (2, 85) = 2.936, p = 0.059, η = 0.065].

When comparing our set of DE genes with candidate sexually antagonistic genes identified from past studies, we found moderate and marginally non-significant overlap with candidates identified in Innocenti and Morrow (2010 ; Fisher's exact P = 0.06; supplementary table S3, Supplementary Material online) and statistically significant overlap with genes enriched in candidate sexually antagonistic SNPs identified by Ruzicka et al.

Patients with an increase in BI during geriatric hospital treatment had a marginally non-significant lower number of uncompensated problems (5.6 vs. 7.2; p = 0.06) than those with no change or decrease in BI.

For SD CoP in AP direction, a marginally non-significant effect was observed when comparing pre- and post-Exo data of individuals with MS with that of HSs and (F(2,20) = 3.25, p = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.24).

14% (40/286)), albeit with a marginally non-significant difference ( p = 0.06) ( Table 2 ).

Similarly, rosemary extract spraying resulted in marginally non-significant reductions in yolk sac weight ( P = 0.06) and yolk sac-to-chick weight ratio ( P = 0.09) compared to other treatment groups by the end of the first week.

This is also reflected in m 1 and T crit showing a marginally non-significant ( P =0.06) positive correlation also ( Supplementary Table S3 ).

The ANCOVA results indicated a significant main effect of ABST on the proportion of correct responses in TBPM, F (1, 70) = 6.157, p < 0.05, ηp 2 = 0.08, whereas the influence of reading comprehension on response accuracy was marginally non-significant, F (1, 70) = 3.82, p = 0.06, ηp 2 = 0.05.

The rank correlation was significant in winter (Spearman rho = 1, P = 0.003), but marginally non-significant in summer (rho = 0.55, P = 0.06) and fall (rho = 0.39, P = 0.12).

Cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin concentrations There were no differences among Al treatments or between populations in the concentrations of cellulose or lignin in either leaves or stems (S4-S6 Tables in S1 Appendix ), but both these fractions declined significantly in root tissues in response to Al addition ( Fig 3 ) and there was a parallel decline in hemicellulose concentrations in roots that was marginally non-significant (F 2,30 = 3.09, P = 0.060, S4 Table in S1 Appendix ).

Statistical tests indicated that their differences were marginally non-significant ( p = 0.06).

Facebook For Facebook, as shown in Figure 2 , the ANOVA revealed a main effect of news topic, F (6, 486) = 2.61, p = 0.017, η p 2 = 0.03, with statistically similar sharing rates for Education ( M = 16%), Europe ( M = 15%), Scotland ( M = 15%), Health ( M = 14%), Economy ( M = 14%) and Crime ( M = 13%), with the interesting effect showing significantly lower sharing rates for Immigration ( M = 9%) in comparison to each of the other topics, all p’s ≤ 0.033, with the exception of a marginally non-significant difference with Crime, t (81) = 1.91, p = 0.060, d = 0.21.

Overall JHLES scores were higher among more recently enrolled students, with first-year students (2023 cohort) reporting a mean of 88.5 (SD 14.1) compared to 82.3 (SD 21.3) in the 2019 cohort, although the overall difference was marginally non-significant (F = 2.32, p = 0.06, η2 = 0.021).

A high frequency of CN8 (mCAF-rich) was marginally non-significant as a prognostic factor for a higher probability of recurrence ( p = 0.06; HR (95%CI) = 4.54 (0.94–22.01); Supplementary Fig. 4 A) and distant metastasis ( p = 0.07; HR (95%CI) = 3.46 (0.91–13.10); Supplementary Fig. 4B) in the Cox regression model.

After adjusting for potential different responses according to participant age, sex, or ethnicity, image E was significantly worse than images C, D, and F ( P < .05), and worse than image B (although marginally non-significant; P = .06).

There was a significant interaction between the group and time for the multivariate test, Wilks Lambda = 0.93, F (2, 94) = 3.60, p = 0.03, partial η 2 = 0.07, and a marginally non-significant interaction effect for the univariate test - F (2, 190) = 2.83, p = 0.06, partial η 2 = 0.03.

Funnel plot asymmetry evaluation using the Egger’s test revealed significant asymmetry (t = 3.58; p -value < 0.002), indicating potential publication bias, while Begg’s test yielded a marginally non-significant result (z = 1.87; p -value > 0.06), suggesting weaker evidence against funnel plot symmetry (Funnel plot in Supplementary Figure S1A ).

Finally, the reduction in miR-107 in patient-derived muscle biopsies was marginally non-significant ( p value = 0.06) ( Figure 1 G).