“marginally nonsignificant”

dur-1 had a marginally nonsignificant ( P = 0.08) increase in δ 13 C, consistent with the gravimetric analysis.

There was also a marginally nonsignificant tendency for the spot pattern to differ between St Helen's and Tresco ( P =0.08).

The association between overall CHR and AQ after controlling for score on the mindreading composite measure was significant in Subsample 1, r p = −.22, P = .02, but marginally nonsignificant in subsample 2 when reported one‐tailed, r p = −.13, P = .08.

Concerning the risk for major thrombosis, antiplatelet agents resulted in a marginally nonsignificant decrease in the corresponding risk compared with control (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.02, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.08), as shown in Figure 2 .

Comparing the three areas, the hares/km/visit was marginally nonsignificant (Friedman χ 2 2 = 4.98, P = 0.08), with the number of hares/km/visit marginally lower in intensely burned compared to nonburned areas ( P = 0.071) ( Figure 2 ).

In addition, a marginally nonsignificant interaction was found for stratified analysis by energy‐adjusted vegetable intake ( P = .08).

The pooled effect size was marginally nonsignificant [MD = 10.23 mg/dL (−1.68, 22.14), t = 1.91, P = 0.08, and d = 0.74 (0.02, 1.45)] ( Figure 3 ).

The G × G × E interaction term was marginally nonsignificant ( F = 1.17, P = 0.08).

While a similar trend is also visible in the ICR/PL and ICL/PR cases, the effect remained marginally nonsignificant ( F (1,12) = 3.60, η 2 = 0.23, p = 0.082, Cohen’s d = 1.09; F (1,12) = 2.4, η 2 = 0.17, p = 0.16, Cohen’s d = 0.91, respectively).

Although comparison of the model to a reduced formulation with a single homogeneous residual variance assumed suggests the inflation of residual variance in the presence of a competitor is marginally nonsignificant ( χ 1 2 = 3.002, p = 0.082), an increase in overall phenotypic variance (conditional on fixed effects) in Context 2 relative to 1 is statistically significant ( χ 1 2 = 6.904, p = 0.009).

At the 25th quantile, the group effect was marginally nonsignificant (q = 0.25: coefficient = − 3.78, 95% CI: − 8.05, 0.50, p = 0.083).

Within subjects, day number, and the interaction between initial body mass and day significantly influenced morning body mass ( F 1,63 = 5.16, P = 0.03 and F 1,63 = 5.10, P = 0.03, respectively), whereas the interaction effect between treatment and day number was marginally nonsignificant ( F 1,63 = 3.111, P = 0.083).

When we analyze the APL1 paralogs separately, we find that APL1C , the only APL1 paralog involved in the described protein complex, is a clear outlier from the majority of loci in this population ( Figure 3 ), although its HEW statistic is marginally nonsignificant after multiple testing ( HEW corrected p = 0.084).

2 A) – and a positive relationship with CLOCK male genotypes, albeit marginally nonsignificant ( P = 0.084, Fig. 2 B).

[ 36 ], changes in fatigue levels of working or studying healthy young adults were only marginally nonsignificant ( p = 0.084, large effect size) and decreased after exposure to a forest environment (mean pre-test = 1.22; mean post-test = 0.81), supporting this suggestion.

As predicted, in North America putatively adaptive TEs tend to be more frequent in the Northern compared to the Southern populations although this pattern is marginally nonsignificant (G-test, P-value = 0.0845).

In addition, we have forced into the final Cox's PH model the performance status (ECOG 0–1 vs 2), even if it has a marginally nonsignificant effect in our analyses ( P =0.086), because it is an essential criterion for the treatment of unresectable NSCLC ( Pfister et al , 2004 ).

Treatment alone remained as a marginally nonsignificant predictor in males ( F 1,19 = 3.26, P = 0.086; Fig. 1 B), but no tendency was observed in females ( F 1,19 = 0.22, P = 0.641; Fig. 1 C).

Additionally, a marginally nonsignificant improvement in well-being was observed in the self-experience group compared with the relaxation group ( F (1, 126) = 2.99, p = .086, d = .261) ( Figure 3 ).

When the subset of neutral loci was analyzed separately, g 2 values were also always positive and differed significantly from zero in 2009 and 2010 and were marginally nonsignificant in 2011 ( p = .087) and 2012 ( p = .077) (Table S2).

This increased fragility was marginally nonsignificant in 2 K (9/70 vs. 18/70; chi-squared test, P = 0.087) but pronounced in 15 K (9/70 vs. 27/70; P = 0.001), partly driven by 15 K’s increased susceptibility to bile salts (BS) and oxidative (OX) stress ( Fig. 2 F ), the most altered traits ( Fig. 2 D ).

All metrics were significantly reduced in colonies receiving QMP + methyl oleate (number of active cells: estimate = 1.4, z = 3.0, Tukey-adjusted P = 0.0066; charged cells: estimate = 1.8, z = 3.0, Tukey-adjusted P = 0.0072; cell score: estimate = 1.5, z = 3.2, Tukey-adjusted P = 0.0040) except for the likelihood of having active queen cells, which had a marginally nonsignificant reduction (estimate = 2.6, z = 2.1, P = 0.089).

The phylogenetic MANOVA is marginally nonsignificant (phylogenetic P = 0.0890), although this analysis included only eighteen of the twenty species that were included in the nonphylogenetic MANOVA.

It was shown that there was an improving trend of satisfaction with life although the statistical result is marginally nonsignificant ( χ 2(3) = 6.52, P = 0.089). 4.

Conversely, insufficient water at handwash stations was associated with a lower risk (∼55%) of diarrhea-only (ARR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.22–0.91, P = 0.03) and vomiting-only (ARR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.28–1.09, P = 0.09—marginally nonsignificant) episodes, and a statistically nonsignificant 47% increase in risk for diarrhea and vomiting (ARR = 1.47, 95% CI = 0.75–2.89, P = 0.26).