Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Further analyses for political statements showed a marginally significant interaction of SPEAKER × TRUE-FALSE × ROI for Experiment 1 (Minister of Finance; Estimate: −0.74, Standard error: 0.39, t = −1.90) but no effects of TRUE-FALSE or interactions of SPEAKER × TRUE-FALSE were observable for Experiment 2 (media personality; all | t s| <1).
In all the 3 Singaporean Asian datasets, serum CRP was associated with the CRVE phenotype (p-value ≤6.56×10 −4 , Figure 1 ) and the CRP increasing allele (G allele) of rs2794520 was marginally significant for increased CRVE (p-value between 0.048 and 0.022) but, this association was not replicated in the larger CHARGE consortium European samples and overall meta-analysis revealed no statistical significance ( Table 4 ).
The estimated relative risks associated with the use of glucocorticoids alone to treat gastrointestinal adverse effects vary from 1.1 (not significant) to 1.5 (marginally significant). 11 , 15 In addition to upper gastrointestinal morbidity, visceral perforation is another complication associated with glucocorticoid use. 7 , 16 , 17 To our knowledge, the R‐CHOP regimen contains a high dose of prednisone, so the patients in the prevention group received standard R‐CHOP treatment without prednisone until the complete recovery of gastric ulcers.
While these marginally significant interactions with region only support very tentative conclusions concerning differences between regions, follow-up comparisons suggest that the left precentral gyrus represents heard speech using phonemic or syllabic representations to a greater degree than the left temporal lobe region; simple comparison of the phoneme model shows a marginally significant reduction ( t 16 = 1.926, P = 0.072), as does the equivalent comparison for the CV structure model ( t 16 = 2.068, P = 0.055), whereas neither of the feature models show any change between region (both P > 0.377).