Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

While these marginally significant interactions with region only support very tentative conclusions concerning differences between regions, follow-up comparisons suggest that the left precentral gyrus represents heard speech using phonemic or syllabic representations to a greater degree than the left temporal lobe region; simple comparison of the phoneme model shows a marginally significant reduction ( t 16 = 1.926, P = 0.072), as does the equivalent comparison for the CV structure model ( t 16 = 2.068, P = 0.055), whereas neither of the feature models show any change between region (both P > 0.377).
For example, the fact that a match with a marginally significant FET2p of 0.05 and an R 2 of 0.8 (an above average R 2 for genuine matches between functionally equivalent phenotypes; see Table 2 ) would have a PM score of ~1 (1.040824) makes this score a useful benchmark since scores <1 must either have low R 2 or insignificant FET2p while scores >>1 must at least have a highly significant FET2p if not a high R 2 as well.
Finally, a study using data from the U.S.–Canada Children’s Oncology Group (COG) showed a marginally significant association between residential exposure to parental insecticide use and the use of professional lawn/landscape services and unilateral retinoblastoma (99 cases, OR 2.8; 1.1–6.7 and OR 2.8; 1.0–8.2, respectively) [ 64 ].
This aligns with evidence from a recent meta-analysis encompassing 35 studies, which identified insomnia (RR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.17–1.74), sleep-disordered breathing (RR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07–1.39), and additional sleep-related disorders—including sleep fragmentation and sleep-related movement disorders (RR = 1.58; 95% CI, 1.21–2.07)—as significant risk factors for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD); excessive daytime sleepiness demonstrated a marginally significant association with AD risk (RR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.00–1.40) [ 22 ].