“marginally significant”

However, a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures showed only a marginally significant effect of Time (p = 0.05), but no Time*Treatment interaction (p = 0.19).

Results: The unadjusted difference between ASD and TD groups in terms of geometric mean blood Pb concentrations was marginally significant ( p = 0.05), but for Al concentrations, the adjusted difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

Also in this patient group, reductions in DBP at week 52 with both combination doses were marginally significant when compared with linagliptin 5 mg (both p=0.05), but did not approach statistical significance when compared with empagliflozin. 3.1.2.

The dose – response association was also marginally significant ( P =0.05).

However, a marginally significant association (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.00-1.55, p = 0.05) was found with the urinary concentration of DMAs III .

The association between IncFIA and enrofloxacin was marginally significant ( p = 0.050).

For betweenness centrality and nucleotide diversity the correlations were also negative and marginally significant (τ = -0.12, P = 0.05 for Africans; τ = -0.11, P = 0.08 for Europeans).

There was marginally significant variation in percentage mortality of lice between diazinon treated and untreated group throughout the study periods ( p = 0.05).

When we assessed whether smokers’ lower sensitivity to preference reversals is statistically mediated by the group difference in metacognitive accuracy, the Sobel test showed only a marginally significant result, t = 1.94, p = 0.05.

The intergroup difference was marginally significant in the left hippocampus ( p = 0.05) and significant in the right hippocampus ( p < 0.001) (Figure 4 ). 3.5 Age Subgroup The pooled effect size was large for both the left (SMD = −1.25 [−1.64 to −0.86]) and right (SMD = −0.93 [−1.43 to −0.42]) hippocampi in the age >72 years subgroup.

Each marker within a genetic region (including 1kb upstream and downstream regions) was evaluated for its association with the corresponding gene expression, yielding 722 genes with marginally significant cis-eQTL ( p -value < 0.05).

previously conducted a traditional pairwise meta-analysis to compare the VRF resistance of roots endodontically treated by the two canal-filling systems, the result was marginally significant ( P = 0.05) [ 11 ].

The finding of marginally significant high prevalence of FT in patients with late onset psoriasis compared to early onset disease (50% and 29.2% respectively; p=0.05) may be partly explained by the reported successively increasing prevalence of FT with advancing age ( 24 ).

sagittata population (20%), a difference that was marginally significant (χ 2 = 3.76, P = 0.05, fig. 2 C ).

1%; p = 0.001), and end-stage liver disease showed a marginally significant difference (7.5% vs. 2%; p = 0.050).

The observed inequality in HIV transmission was also marginally significant at p = 0.05.

For those aged < 70 years, only a marginally significant correlation was found ( B = − 0.047, 95% CI − 0.095 to 0.000, P = 0.05) (Fig. 4 a).

Finally, variance in offspring activity was marginally significant in the post-exposure period of the behavioural assay (Levene’s test: F 3,197 = 2.58, p = 0.05), with the lowest variance being in offspring of fathers exposed to visual cues only (control offspring standard error: 4.58; visual: 2.64; olfactory: 3.93; visual and olfactory: 4.41).

For decision making, only total effect was marginally significant and small (β = 0.119, p < .05), but neither direct nor indirect effects were significant.

Turning to the demographic covariates, a marginally significant effect emerged for the unknown race and ethnicity category ( b = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.65, p = 0.05), but all other demographic coefficients were non-significant.

Results from the meta-analysis were significant for any migraine (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99) and marginally significant for MA (OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-1.00; p = 0.05).

The combined phase of the modified dots task was marginally significant at p = 0.05.

The marginally significant association between professional rank and resilience ( β = 0.115, P = 0.05) should be interpreted cautiously.

However, possibly owing to a small sample size, the effect of single embryo transfer only reached a borderline significant effect for ongoing pregnancy (OR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1, 1.0; P = 0.05) and a marginally significant effect for live birth (OR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1, 1.0; P = 0.06) (Table III ).

Activity was found to be a marginally significant risk factor ( P = 0.05).