There was a marginally significant interaction between cued area size and cue style on accuracy, F (2,56) = 3.06, p = 0.05, but not response time, F (2,56) = 0.50, p = 0.61.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Neutral images were more recognized by healthy participants but were marginally significant than the schizophrenia group ( t = 1.66, p = .05).
3.5 The Role of Water Quality Perceptions in Purchasing A GSEM model with economic stress as the predictor, quality concerns as the mediator, and frequency of purchasing as the outcome indicated that economic stress was a marginally significant predictor of perceived quality ( B = 0.23, SE = 0.12, z = 1.96, p = 0.050) and that perceived quality concerns significantly predicted purchasing behavior ( B = 0.37, SE = 0.17, z = 2.16, p = 0.031) (Table 13 ).
Orphanhood was marginally significant ( p = 0.05), with rates highest for those CA-HIV with no living parent compared to those who had at least one living parent (aOR = 11.03, p = 0.05).
A marginally significant difference was also noted in the mothers’ nationality, with the majority of foreign mothers being in the low PB group (83.3%, Fisher's Exact Test, P = .05).
In the CCD dogs, the difference in %Aβ area between grey matter and white matter was marginally significant ( p = 0.05, Mann-Whitney) ( Table 2 ), thereby supporting the finding of the Aβ plaques being primarily present in the grey matter, and especially in the deep cortical layer V and VI.
For the MCH, there was a marginally significant reduction post-treatment (29.25 Q1–Q3: 27.4–30.6) compared to values before the treatment initiation (29 Q1–Q3: 27.1–30.4) in male patients ( p -value < 0.05).
Briefly, patients with and without VH did not differ for any demographic, clinical or neuropsychological characteristics, except for the NPI total score ( p = 0.01) and the presence of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).
In girls, the main effect of sampling groups was marginally significant, F (2, 179) = 2.97, p = .05.
The bottleneck model only shows marginally significant improvement over the isolation-with-migration model ( P = 0.05) but does not improve over the secondary contact model ( P = 0.87).
[ 26 ] showed that treatment of C57BL6 mice with a GCGR-Ab at a weekly dose of 5 mg/kg for 4 weeks increased islet delta cell number by ∼35% in association with marginally significant (P = 0.05) delta cell proliferation.
2E , t = 0.79, p > 0.05), but a marginally significant difference in staining density per cell (Fig. 2F , t = 1.38, p = 0.05), suggesting that CB1 mRNA level is higher in VTA glutamatergic neurons than in VTA GABAergic neurons. Δ 9 -THC produces conditioned place aversion in mice We then used the conditioned place preference (CPP) or aversion (CPA) procedures to compare the rewarding or aversive effects of Δ 9 -THC between VgluT2- CB1 ‒/‒ mice and their wildtype control littermates.
Three-year OS was marginally significant in patients with stage I/II compared with patients with stage III (64.3% vs 19.4%; P =.05).
The regression model contained 4 item factors (CC-Acc1, P <.001; CD-Acc3, P <.001; DR-Acc1, P =.03; and DR-RT1, P =.02) as the significant predictor at P <.05; 5 item factors were marginally significant predictors at P =.05-.07 ( Table 3 ).
CYP2C9 1075 A>C (*3 variant) polymorphism showed a marginally significant difference between patients having multiple drug resistance and drug-responsive patients for AC genotype (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.32–1.00, P = 0.05).
An additional regression analysis conducted on 50% of bilingual children with highest weighted exposure and on matched monolingual peers revealed a main effect of Age ( p < 0.01), but only a marginally significant effect of Group ( p = 0.05), and no interaction of Group and Age ( p = 0.89).
We found no main effect of participant condition (χ 2 (1) = 2.5, P = 0.11), a marginally significant effect of other condition (χ 2 (1) = 3.7, P = 0.05) and, crucially, a significant interaction between participant condition and other condition (χ 2 (3) = 9.7, P = 0.001).
Complications and treatments Compared with those without COPD, patients with COPD had a significant higher likelihood of progressing to respiratory failure (19.2% vs 5.1%; P < .01), and a marginally significant higher likelihood of developing cardiac insufficiency (10.3% vs 2.6%; P = .050) (Table 3 ).
Reducing Visual Information Increased Pointing Error For both younger and older adults, pointing error increased as we removed visual information, going from full, to partial, to blindfolded conditions ( Figure 8 B), although this increase was marginally significant (i.e., there was a weak effect of visual information when considering both the fake and real hand conditions together, p = 0.05).
After accounting for both weekly- and macro-level covariates (Full Model), the effect of perceived coronavirus threat on religious interest remained significant, B = 0.03, df = 4931.23, p <.001, while the effect of actual COVID-19 severity was marginally significant, B = 0.01, df = 4894.23, p =.050.
A marginally significant reduction in the MSE was found in segments related to apneas compared to hypopneas in the estimated motion signal (1.66 ± 1.46% vs 2.12 ± 0.87%, p = 0.05).
In addition to the indirect pathways, we observed a marginally significant direct effect of ethnic identification on COVID-19 vaccine uptake ( b = –0.52, SE = -0.03, P = .05), indicating that individuals with minority ethnic identities were somewhat less likely to report vaccine uptake, independent of national identification and trust in institutions.
There was a marginally significant effect of Group, F (1, 51) = 4.04, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.07 indicating higher proportion of congruent choices in the Deaf (54.2%) compared to normal-hearing participants (51.5%, Fig. 3A ).
Notably, as shown in Table 2 , ACT combined with conventional rehabilitation showed a marginally significant greater improvement in depressive symptoms compared with ACT alone ( p = 0.05). 3.3.2 Anxiety Thirteen studies reported the effects of ACT on anxiety symptoms in stroke patients.
Among participants with a mean age under 40 years (Steffens 2022 and Evman 2023), PRP treatment resulted in a marginally significant improvement in olfactory function compared to controls (SMD = 2.10, 95% CI: 0.00 to 4.20, p = 0.05).