“marginally significant”

Regarding survey factors, the 3rd survey (2019) showed a marginally significant increase in the likelihood of being highly annoyed compared to the 1st survey ( p ≤ 0.05), while the 4th survey (2023) did not show a statistically significant difference.

Also in this patient group, reductions in DBP at week 52 with both combination doses were marginally significant when compared with linagliptin 5 mg (both p=0.05), but did not approach statistical significance when compared with empagliflozin. 3.1.2.

There was a marginally significant effect for “physical attractiveness” where the female dentist model was thought of as slightly ( p = .05) less attractive than the other three models.

A marginally significant association was observed between age and compassion satisfaction ( p = 0.05), indicating a potential influence of age on perceived fulfillment.

In addition, political ideology was found to moderate the effect of the moral frame on credibility at a marginally significant level, B = 35, p = 0.05.

In multivariate analysis including variables with P<0.10 (cortisol and gender), high cortisol showed a marginally significant association with shorter PFS (HR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.00–2.69, P = 0.050), and female gender remained an independent risk factor (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.01–2.49, P = 0.044; Table 4 ).

Patients with decreasing eGFR had higher transgelin levels (median 106.6 versus 83.9 ng/mL), although the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

The significant effects of disturbance level ( P = 0.013), and a marginally significant interaction between disturbance level and alert distance ( P = 0.050) led us to include disturbance level, as well as alert distance in subsequent analyses.

It revealed a main effect of Hemisphere [ F 1 , 41 = 9.24, p = 0.004, η 2 = 0.20], no effect of Condition [ F 2 , 82 = 0.82, p = 0.445, η 2 = 0.02] and a marginally significant interaction between these two factors [ F 2 , 82 = 3.08, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.07].

The Egger test for funnel plot asymmetry was marginally significant (intercept 0.66, P =.05).

adjusted activity (58%), a difference that was marginally significant ( P = 0.05).

BMI was not correlated with any of the BP variability measures (| r | < 0.05), but correlated with DBP, which was marginally significant ( r = 0.16, P < 0.05).

Moreover, no correlation was found between either the RBD or NAb titer at T2 with T- and B-lymphocyte subpopulations, except for a marginally significant positive correlation of NAb titers with the CD4 + CD28 – CD57 + percentage (BC=0.359, R 2 =0.129, P =0.05) at T2.

This represented a marginally significant association between CPN and CSS (HR 1.78, p = 0.05).

The patient’s rights domain score showed a marginally significant difference in the IPW-adjusted analysis (−2.60 points; 95% CI −5.16 to −0.04; P= .05) but not in the unadjusted (−2.05 points; 95% CI −4.61 to 0.52; P =.12) or MI-adjusted analyses (−2.92 points; 95% CI −6.93 to 1.09; P =.15).

At T 2 , the between-group difference was smaller and marginally significant (β = 0.28, 95% CI [0.00, 0.56], p = .05; d = 0.06).

Autonomy showed a marginally significant difference (p = 0.050, partial η2 = 0.012), with employed women scoring higher than homemakers.

There was a marginally significant main effect of condition, F (1, 59) = 3.88, p = 0.05, η 2 p = 0.06, because children who were given credibility information at test ( M = 0.56, SD = 0.14) reported more details from the credible website than those not provided with information ( M = 0.47, SD = 0.15).

At baseline the MC/SB group had lower salivary amylase activities than the control group (marginally significant: F [1,46] = 3.95; p = 0.05).

To resolve the cTBS × Effort level × Trial interaction, we computed separate MGLMs for each effort level: For high effort, but not for medium and low effort, we observed a marginally significant negative effect of trial, β = −1.70, t (71) = 1.95, p = .05, BF 10 = 3.50, suggesting that in the control group participants were less willing to choose the effortful option with increasing time‐on‐task.

Postoperative nasal packing was associated with reduced rates of diabetes insipidus and thyroid-stimulating hormone abnormalities ( P < 0.05) and a marginally significant reduction in cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea ( P = 0.05).

We also found that additional seven SNPs in six genes showed marginally significant association with NIHL ( P > 0.05 and < 0.1).

In contrast, exposure to organizational vision had a marginally significant negative indirect effect through CWB ( β = −0.02, p = 0.05, 95% CI [−0.05, 0.00] ).

Compared with the reputation group and the regardless-of-reputation group, according to the linear regression results, the interaction term between reputation constraint and agent type has a marginally significant impact on sharing behaviors ( F = 3.981, p = 0.050), indicating that when the participants are of different types, the impact of reputation constraints on sharing behaviors is significantly different.

Second, although the analysis of negative control outcomes showed a marginally significant association between semaglutide 2.4 mg use and sensorineural hearing loss (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01–1.17; p < 0.05), the effect size is small and above 1, suggesting that even if weak residual confounding exists in the current study, it would likely bias our findings from the main analyses conservatively toward the null.