“marginally significant”

Although this model shows a marginally significant coefficient ( p < 0.005) for logP in comparison to other descriptors of the model ( p < 0.001) when considered alone, its inclusion is essential because lipophilicity influences both solubility and the ability to partition into the lipid bilayer of the epithelium.

Results: Duffy null was strongly associated with higher hs-CRP (meta-analysis p = 2.62 × 10 −9 ), but the association was largely attenuated, though still marginally significant ( p = 0.005), after conditioning on known CRP locus alleles in linkage disequilibrium with the Duffy gene.

Moreover, three of these correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.005 for all three correlations), while a fourth was marginally significant ( p = 0.076).

There are a total of 21 comparisons, so in this section statistically "significant" is defined as p < 0.002, "marginally significant" as p < 0.005, and "possibly significant" as p < 0.05.

, body weight in men was positively correlated with knee extensor muscle strength in a marginally significant manner ( r = 0 . 222 , p = 0 . 005 ). 38 Contrarily, it was found that in females ( r = 0 . 004 , p = 0 . 985 ) body weight was not correlated with knee extensor muscle strength. 38 In addition, Miyatake et al. ’s study demonstrated a statistically significant positive correlation between leg stren

Absorbed dose is a marginally significant predictor for progression ( p value = 0.005).

There was a marginally significant effect for Target, F (1, 49) = 12, p < 0.005, with Love (0.457) less than Salted (0.468).

Listed for every significant cluster ( p < 0.005, k ≥ 10) are anatomical regions; hemispheres (“H”) as left (“L”), right (“R”), or bilateral (“B”); stereotactic coordinates in MNI space in mm ( x , y , z ); test statistics ( t df ); probability values ( p ); cluster extents in voxels ( k ); and results of small‐volume correction (SVC) at the cluster level (“C”) or the peak level (“P”) ( p FWE < 0.05), where marginally significant (“c” or “p” in lower case) (0.05 < p FWE < 0.10) or uncorrected (“U”) ( p < 0.005) results are also listed if the most stringent threshold for SVC was not attained within the region of interest.

Furthermore, a marginally significant difference was observed for the 100% propylene glycol condition ( p < 0.005).

After Greenhouse-Geisser correction, a marginally significant interaction time × sex was found ( F (1.59, 1) = 6.15, p = 0.005, η p 2 = 0.07; Fig. 2 ).

The removal of one influential data point (see figure 1 ) weakened these relationships, becoming non-significant for ROUTINE ( p = 0.27), marginally significant for OXPHOS ( p = 0.057) but remaining highly significant for ETS ( p = 0.005).

We observed a significant CR-SOCIAL main effect in the theta frequency band for eyes-open local LLC values, F (1,94) = 16.060 p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.146, along with a marginally significant CR-SOCIAL main effect in low alpha, F (1,94) = 8.385, p = 0.005, η p 2 = 0.082.

While not statistically significantly associated with aTRH in our other analyses, the variant had a consistent direction of effect in all our analyses, with marginally significant p -values for the multi-ethnic aTRH versus treated controls (OR [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.80–0.96], p = 5.15E-03), AA aTRH versus normotensive controls (OR [95% CI] = 0.83 [0.72–0.95], p = 8.47E-03), and EA aTRH versus normotensive controls (OR [95% CI] = 0.81 [0.69–0.94], p = 5.81E-03).

We note as a caveat to this conclusion that, when we analyzed the subset of networks presented in Fig 3B that were generated with combinations of zero and three features, there was a marginally significant correlation between the number of external genomic features integrated and the proportion of interactions that were subsequently discovered (ρ = 0.17, P = 0.0055).

The SatScan also revealed one marginally significant ( p = 0.0056) time-space hotspot in cattle between 20/10/2022–20/03/2023 in southern Laos (106.062 N,14.7513 E) with a radius of 0.49 km ( Fig. 2 ). 4 Discussion In this study, we found that among livestock tested across the 18 Lao provinces, the prevalence of rickettsial seropositivity was low (<10%).

Google Desktop generally achieved higher recall than RadReportMiner; the difference was marginally significant per-document ( p = 0.0057) but not statistically significant on a mean basis per-term ( p = 0.273); for two individual terms, the differences were statistically significant.

However, such correlation difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.006, one sided KS-test) or not significant ( p > 0.5, one sided KS-test) between genes with at least one 8mer site in their ORFs and 5′UTRs and genes with no site, respectively ( Fig. 3 B ).

A simple slope analysis showed that the main effect was marginally significant for the male group ( b (292) = 2.59, p = .006).

Sex and age group were significant ( p < 0.001), and core grain food serves had small but significant interaction with age group ( p < 0.001) and a marginally significant interaction with sex ( p = 0.006).

A marginally significant correlation was observed in the inferior parietal areas (r = - 0.053, p = 0.006).

The HIT group showed a marginally significant effect (SMD = -2.14, 95% CI [-4.69, 0.41], p = 0.006, I2 = 76%), with substantial between-study variability.

In this age group, we noticed suggestive causal association between BMI with increased risk of DM (OR = 1.217, 95% CI 1.020-1.452, p = 0.029), and lower fasting glucose (OR = 0.963, 95% CI 0.936-0.991, p = 0.009), as well as marginally significant association with fasting insulin (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.872-0.977, p = 0.006) in females, not in males.

The linear regression model explained 54.4% of the variance of ECAS‐Language scores ( F (19, 219) = 13.77; p < 0.001), with only the ECAS‐Executive positively predicting them at α adjusted = 0.0028 ( β = 0.46; t (219) = 5.97; p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.07), and a similar, although marginally significant, effect being found for ECAS‐Visuo‐spatial ( β = 0.15; t (219) = 2.78; p = 0.006; η 2 = 0.02).

The dark:light activity ratio was reduced (LMM, p=0.024) in Off6-cycle, and there was a marginally significant circatidal (10–14 hr) component (LSP, p=0.006).

Now, the sex-adjusted marginally significant effect of compassion in 1997 on DNAmPhenoAge became statistically significant ( b = −0.54; p = 0.006, n = 843).